Bullshit and idiocy around the Coronavirus (actions, words, decisions ...)

[Obamot]

For the moment there would not beneeds” to do so since WE ALL (almost all employees...and beyond...) slavishly consent to be agents of the system. I will always remember the reflection of this famous lawyer in my corner, who made me understand:
— “that one could not simultaneously benefit from the status of employee when one had become self-employed...”

(it makes you think...)

So there are already divisions between social classes...

We also saw it in the transmutation of the comedian dandy, into a head of state, then a new metamorphosis into a warlord...

(Guess who...?)

[pedrodelavega]

Pierre chaillot - decoding the eco:

[Remundo]

Who cares if Pierre Chaillot did this or not that.

The documents seem very authentic, taken from a parliamentary commission of inquiry.

So there was rapid euthanasia teams, because giving Rivotril (which is a relaxing anesthetic) to an elderly person with respiratory weakness is precisely to sign his death warrant. But at the time we had already heard of these practices.

And who signed? The covidists. Under what legal framework? The suffocating old people on one side, the relatives banned from visiting on the other... What the fuck?

We must stop attacking the messenger to create a diversion and confront the reality of the facts. The horror of the facts, even.

The same fucking covidists who a few months later gave €60/month to pay stupid security guards to apply the despicable health pass, instead of hiring nurses.

But that was not enough: still the same garbage that dismissed X0 caregivers of patients for medically fallacious and legally unfounded vaccine reasons, and who still refuse their reinstatement to this day.

So what this Mr CHAILLOT is doing is not a priority in the debate...

[Obamot]

And who is this Ari Kouts (what does it cost..?)

132E3A0F-8A61-4421-9650-CEB945616B6E.jpeg (132.69 Kio) Consulté 1034 fois

Another one of these fact-checkers of my 2 infused zetetic, king of copy-pasting who defines himself as “nenglé” to make “gender”?

Sorry but this individual does not display the qualifications required to address these topics. Out of desperation to find an invented counter-narrative at all costs, should we continue to let you post such shit?

[izentrop]

Who cares if Pierre Chaillot did this or not that.

The documents seem very authentic, taken from a parliamentary commission of inquiry.

So there was rapid euthanasia teams, because giving Rivotril (which is a relaxing anesthetic) to an elderly person with respiratory weakness is precisely to sign his death warrant.

We recognize there the great specialist in intox

Rivotril poisoning and euthanasia of the elderly
Several popular social media posts incorrectly claim that elderly patients would be "euthanized" during the Covid-19 epidemic.

https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/ar ... 55770.html

[Remundo]

hold the master of intox... France Info must also be conspiratorial...

Video Covid-19: "We gave the elderly no chance to get out of it", indignantly a public nursing home health executive

what a pity that France Info did not call the decoders of the world, always quick to lick the Q of Macronie...

By the way, do you get a nightly bonus for misinformation? Go to bed go!

I confine myself to the search for truth, which is quite the subject here.
So I intervene in this sense, but strangely the majority of regulars of the forum, fortunately not all of them prefer an alternative narrative that destroys the truth by giving pride of place to crooks and charlatans...

And then they are surprised that I ignore them.

that you ignore us, chick, stop your exhausting and thankless job!

[Obamot]

Indeed, it is not a question of knowing if we would have “deliberately “euthanized” the elderly in nursing homes”, but whether the intentional (or unintentional) administration of any inappropriate treatment to them was administered resulting in death.

Here is expressed all the perversity of “fact-checker farms sponsored by pharmas”, which constantly, whatever the subject, seek to invalidate facts that are real, but who are not in favor of criminal government policy — this is a general opinion on my part, based on many facts, which are undeniable (Rivotril is not an isolated case) — just as it is undeniable that the prescription of Rivotril has increased.

Proof of this is the increase in the distribution of boxes of Rivotril by pharmacies:

1A40DFC1-0835-4850-A7BF-EDF033B7E4DF.png (30.08 Kio) Consulté 1004 fois

Afterwards, you just have to ask yourself the right questions in a pragmatic way, without looking for noon to two p.m.:

Is this fact correlated with the chronology of events: YES.
Was Rivotril forgotten in a drawer or prescribed during the said period: ADMINISTERED (injectable product with expiry date).
Is this fact correlated with the increase in deaths in the population group concerned? YES.
Have there been other cases similar to Rivotril: YES

Afterwards, the question that would interest the courts in a possible criminal case, would then be to establish what is called “willingness to harm”... That's what matters. Then, other aspects can be broken down, such as “dol” or “dol eventual”, but also "negligent homicide” even more "to have caused death without the intention of giving it” (for example in imposed protocols), without there having been negligence in the application, whatever... (the allocation of responsibilities would then come). All these aspects cannot be debunked since no one has yet ruled on these elements. Which proves that fact-checking is a big deal of rubbish in this case.

We can find out where it comes from and why (eh-eh-eh)

Fact-checking therefore does not and cannot deny a point that has not yet been investigated: there is no reason to do so.
It is also frankly suspect and can only result from these “farms of fact-checkers” (big clue).

But obviously, all this is in the conditional, I am not in the secret of the gods, like the "fact-checkers" of operetta

[pedrodelavega]

[Christophe]

Ah, I almost agree with Tristan…in substance, not his method…

[Christophe]