Bullshit and idiocy around the Coronavirus (actions, words, decisions ...)

[Obamot]

I add water to the mill of Philippot on the situation in the USA says Thomas Renz, lawyer



Thomas Renz, notably stated on the database that authorized circles seek to conceal, including Antonio Fauci) that:

— “Coronavirus vaccines were more harmful than the virus itself. "People who die are vaccinated",

But hey, we know here that we are talking about a planetary scandal on a global level, which continues to overflow...

He dreams, these kékés are incurable and misinformation is part of their business

As neither you Izy, nor your pro-vax*, don't understand anything, you can't in any case have a relevant opinion on this: ZERO or else you come out of your arrogant attitude and admit a real honest debate on these questions (which you regularly flee/deny, by contenting yourself with sending salvos without tail or head)

That once by pure chance you are right is only the reflection of the law of probability (random behavior of a phenomenon depending on chance), while deaths are facts that cannot be relegated to mere speculation, which shows where is the puppet that regularly seeks to place smoke screens in front of concrete and real elements.

Well it failed my old man. It's you who lives in the illusion of denial, your favorite game before it's all over.

*) these are NOT vaccines.

[reinoso]

twitter.com/barriere_dr blah blah blah

very funny this Jérôme barriere is an outstanding whistleblower...
(actually extremely dangerous)
the November 21 2021

Doctor Jérôme Barrière files a complaint after being threatened with death on Twitter
The oncologist was only defending his ideas on vaccination for 5-11 year olds

but as an oncologist he couldn't ignore the increases in cancer and yet...

on July 3, 2022

In a pre-publication article, you warn the scientific community against the dissemination of pseudo-science in certain journals, what is your warning based on?

This is a general statement based on an article published in a journal considered serious with a significant impact. This article is a review of the literature on the potentially harmful effects of anti-Covid vaccination. He claims that anti-Covid vaccination with a messenger RNA vaccine could induce deficits in the immune system leading to increased infectious risks and a decrease in anti-cancer immune vigilance, therefore to an increased risk of cancers.

I noted his tweets for latronchenbiais and the deceased factandfurious, and yes it must pay more than medicine!

[izentrop]

Antivax motivations revisited but so true

[fracass]

Tsss, it's warmed up that... Besides, it's absolutely not comparable to the vaccine... Note, it has a place here, given the title of the thread

[izentrop]

Tsss, that's warmed up... Besides, it's absolutely not comparable to the vaccine...

Same kind of plot if you look closely:

Studies made by big pharma, so not credible.
The testimony of the neighbor more credible than the scientific consensus.
Some have had it three times, which proves the ineffectiveness of the vaccine.
The vaccine causes heart problems, but the virus is harmless.
Vaccine makers get rich on an experimental vaccine.
Besides, it was the labs that invented the virus to make money.

We're on the same trip

[Obamot]

It's good that you post this kind of cliché, because it demonstrates the great rigidity of your cerebral plasticity...

First of all, mRNA injections are anti-punctures (which do not prevent punctures and on the contrary cause more punctures...)

Suddenly, the ground is so slippery that your tires supposed to grip the ground, prevent the transmission where it would be required!

Your text is supposed to make us believe that it is prevention. While not. Prevention is upstream, if need be, it would be studded tires or snow chains, but it is above all a healthy lifestyle and an “all-terrain” food bowl that make the real prophylaxis... Unfortunately studded tires have been banned (HCQ) CQFD...

[Janic]

other possible version of the tires:
I refuse to put on prototype winter tires because
-it's my car, my choice, my freedom guaranteed by law
- the effectiveness of these prototype winter tires has not been proven by studies carried out by independent tire specialists them, of these tire manufacturers
-My neighbor Fernand had an accident after driving with these non-approved tires
- the owners of these tires wear out more quickly than expected by the manufacturers and it costs them a lot of money that the manufacturers refuse to reimburse, despite the law on manufacturer guarantees.
- the approved tire manufacturers do not know what these prototype tires are made of to achieve such poor results in the field.

These prototype tire giants want to reassure users of the danger of this product because they have invested a lot of money to produce it and they still want to sell their product, more expensively.
Moreover, it is these tire manufacturers who claim that their product is very effective (when there is no snow!) which makes them at least 50% effective in their eyes!
If I have THESE chipped tires anyone can track me. even without snow.
Educate yourself, open your eyes, stop being sheep.
This year like the others for 3 years, say no to these ineffective prototype tires when there is snow.

the Izmentrop misses none to ridicule each time more than yesterday, but much less than tomorrow!

[Christophe]

Hihihi!

Pr_nono.jpg (215.63 KiB) Accessed 578 times

Laughter does not kill, stress does!

[Christophe]

I put this here:

[gegyx]

We are badly off.