robob wrote:This argument is not a study:
- nothing proves that what you say is true.
same for you
-the example does not do times.
yes, an example is proof of a possibility (but not of a generality).
- If I believe you, nothing proves that it is you who is the source of the contamination.
- Nothing shows that one of the guests was not symptomatic
- There is no evidence that a symptomatic person has not passed through the area, leaving the virus everywhere, which is mainly transported manually. (Hence the statistical interest of observational studies on a large number of cases.)
- Etc. ..
nothing proves it but if he is the only one to have developed the symptoms a day and a half later, it is still the most probable hypothesis that it was him at the origin of the contamination, but of course the Studies on the subject are not based on the Pedro case alone ...
