Hello ,
who can explain to me why spinach would be richer in a little all that composes them when they are cooked rather than raw ???
where is the magic trick ???
source
http://www.passeportsante.net/fr/Nutrit ... epinard_nu
thank you in advance
Spinach
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
- highfly-addict
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 757
- Registration: 05/03/08, 12:07
- Location: Pyrenees, 43 years
- x 7
No magic, look at the quantities in the top row: there is a ratio of 3 (95/32) which you then find roughly throughout the table.
In short, according to this table, raw or cooked, it is also nourishing.
In short, according to this table, raw or cooked, it is also nourishing.
0 x
"God laughs at those who deplore the effects of which they cherish the causes" BOSSUET
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
Slut,
I agree, but in the 95 gr there is water ...
but both are nourishing, not the problem ...
Simply:
for 32g for 95gr
protein 0.9 / 32 = 0.0281 2.8 / 95 = 0.0294
ditto for everything so there is much more of each element after cooking?
capturing, transforming part of the plant ???
it intrigues me I would like to understand, I will also look but if someone had had the answer seeing that I am a big lazy;) ... understands that it would have arranged me
I agree, but in the 95 gr there is water ...
but both are nourishing, not the problem ...
Simply:
for 32g for 95gr
protein 0.9 / 32 = 0.0281 2.8 / 95 = 0.0294
ditto for everything so there is much more of each element after cooking?
capturing, transforming part of the plant ???
it intrigues me I would like to understand, I will also look but if someone had had the answer seeing that I am a big lazy;) ... understands that it would have arranged me
0 x
- highfly-addict
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 757
- Registration: 05/03/08, 12:07
- Location: Pyrenees, 43 years
- x 7
The small difference can probably be explained by the loss of water from the leaves during scalding.
Well yes, it evaporates around the leaves so probably a little "inside" too!
So at the exit, after draining, we are left with a slightly concentrated product compared to the raw version.
Well ... maybe there is another explanation!?!
Well yes, it evaporates around the leaves so probably a little "inside" too!
So at the exit, after draining, we are left with a slightly concentrated product compared to the raw version.
Well ... maybe there is another explanation!?!
0 x
"God laughs at those who deplore the effects of which they cherish the causes" BOSSUET
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
There is a weight ratio 1 to 3 between the two cups and therefore the composition is the same. However generally the food is taken in quantitative reference (here volume in this case) which gives the impression of a difference. By cons and this is what makes the difference between cooked and raw is that cooked it is possible to consume a larger amount (here ratio of 1 to 3) which does not mean that these overdoses are useful or necessary in nutritional requirements, on the other hand this requires a prolonged digestive effort for less assimilation.
0 x
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
Slut,
thank you for this beginning of response but I must be a little stupid with some places, because it does not really speak to me, on the contrary ...
I agree the Weight ratio is 1 to 3 but not that of volume, that of volume is 1 for 1/2, so half the volume, for the weight I imagine that it is l water that makes the difference, and that for the volume once cooked the spinach is packed therefore less bulky, hence more weight for less volume because the density of spinach increased due to water that she absorbed ...
This does not help me ultimately understand or I do not understand ...
this said my error is perhaps in the fact that I imagine that the cup of raw which makes 250 ml is the same which makes 125ml when cooked ...
If it is not actually that, in this case I think I understand: it is that there is more spinach cooked in the end in the same volume (hence higher density) therefore more nutrients for the same volume ...
And can be a concentration effect too ...
I've just ?
thank you for this beginning of response but I must be a little stupid with some places, because it does not really speak to me, on the contrary ...
I agree the Weight ratio is 1 to 3 but not that of volume, that of volume is 1 for 1/2, so half the volume, for the weight I imagine that it is l water that makes the difference, and that for the volume once cooked the spinach is packed therefore less bulky, hence more weight for less volume because the density of spinach increased due to water that she absorbed ...
This does not help me ultimately understand or I do not understand ...
this said my error is perhaps in the fact that I imagine that the cup of raw which makes 250 ml is the same which makes 125ml when cooked ...
If it is not actually that, in this case I think I understand: it is that there is more spinach cooked in the end in the same volume (hence higher density) therefore more nutrients for the same volume ...
And can be a concentration effect too ...
I've just ?
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
I think as said above: it is a drop in humidity after cooking ... For the rest I think Bidouille that it is an error of approximation ...
We find the coef 95/32 ...
What is not normal is that we do not compare by the same masses ...
I don't quite understand the logic of the double table ...
We find the coef 95/32 ...
What is not normal is that we do not compare by the same masses ...
I don't quite understand the logic of the double table ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
I also do not understand the logic of this table, because:
- it is made under "ideal conditions",
- conditions rarely met in everyday life except to cut vegetables directly in the garden (and only consume them when mature;
- conditions rarely met, since it is by far not always the case, since for convenience we tend to "last the season" to the end (when we are lucky enough to have a garden) so we leave the plants standing while waiting to eat them (when they are in pain since all the energy is then concentrated on the plant's own reproduction) wouldn't it be better to cut everything when ripe and freeze?
- the loss is there, where for those who do not have a garden, in the transport of vegetables to the markets, then to the consumer, and loss again in the fridges before being cooked, to finally reach the table;
- precisely, this is why - if not to consume fresh, and for spinach it is in the minutes following the cut so as not to lose the iron - it would be better to freeze or buy frozen products, since the cold chains move on the place of harvest where everything is "caught" by the cold in a few seconds in-situ ...
Finally the method of cooking: the only one I know is that of cooking with gentle steam (95 degrees C). In addition, cooking in such a pot with a dome-shaped cover allows all the toxins to fall (specific to vegetables or collected in the atmosphere during growth, even during watering with chemical fertilizers) to make them fall back into the water in the lower tank (without it falling on the food, as with a classic lid!)
http://www.nature-vitalite.com/fr/produ ... italiseurs
- it is made under "ideal conditions",
- conditions rarely met in everyday life except to cut vegetables directly in the garden (and only consume them when mature;
- conditions rarely met, since it is by far not always the case, since for convenience we tend to "last the season" to the end (when we are lucky enough to have a garden) so we leave the plants standing while waiting to eat them (when they are in pain since all the energy is then concentrated on the plant's own reproduction) wouldn't it be better to cut everything when ripe and freeze?
- the loss is there, where for those who do not have a garden, in the transport of vegetables to the markets, then to the consumer, and loss again in the fridges before being cooked, to finally reach the table;
- precisely, this is why - if not to consume fresh, and for spinach it is in the minutes following the cut so as not to lose the iron - it would be better to freeze or buy frozen products, since the cold chains move on the place of harvest where everything is "caught" by the cold in a few seconds in-situ ...
Finally the method of cooking: the only one I know is that of cooking with gentle steam (95 degrees C). In addition, cooking in such a pot with a dome-shaped cover allows all the toxins to fall (specific to vegetables or collected in the atmosphere during growth, even during watering with chemical fertilizers) to make them fall back into the water in the lower tank (without it falling on the food, as with a classic lid!)
http://www.nature-vitalite.com/fr/produ ... italiseurs
0 x
Re: Spinach
bidouille23 wrote:Hello ,
who can explain to me why spinach would be richer in a little all that composes them when they are cooked rather than raw ???
where is the magic trick ???
source
http://www.passeportsante.net/fr/Nutrit ... epinard_nu
thank you in advance
There is flavor and dumpling!
Reverse 95 and 32
0 x
"Let food be thy medicine and thy medicine be thy food" Hippocrates
"Everything has a price has no value" Nietzche
Torture for Dummies
Forbid to express the idea that the field is acceleration (magnetic and gravitational)
And you get your patent mental torture option executioner successfully
"Everything has a price has no value" Nietzche
Torture for Dummies
Forbid to express the idea that the field is acceleration (magnetic and gravitational)
And you get your patent mental torture option executioner successfully
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 33 Replies
- 4961 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
22/11/23, 15:20A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 134 Replies
- 13012 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
28/05/23, 06:33A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 18 Replies
- 3729 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
28/08/22, 23:28A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 9 Replies
- 1918 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
16/08/22, 23:35A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 35 Replies
- 6444 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
07/08/23, 12:38A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 266 guests