Spinach
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79332
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11046
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
Slut,
good apart from the HIc messages which I do not interfere with at all ...
Christophe
suddenly I feel less stupid ..... the logic of this table must be Canadian;) ... (not to type Alain, not to type hack;)) ... it is the only logical explanation that I see there .....
good apart from the HIc messages which I do not interfere with at all ...
Christophe
I think as said above: it is a drop in humidity after cooking ... For the rest I think Bidouille that it is an error of approximation ...
We find the coef 95/32 ...
What is not normal is that we do not compare by the same masses ...
I don't quite understand the logic of the double table ...
suddenly I feel less stupid ..... the logic of this table must be Canadian;) ... (not to type Alain, not to type hack;)) ... it is the only logical explanation that I see there .....
0 x
hack hello
the table is well done, what creates confusion is to bring in a volume while the comparisons are made on the weight, two different concepts. But, because there is a but, the consumer fills his plate with a volume and not a weight, so he does not take into account the composition, nor his needs but only his appetite. However, these quantitative notions are only useful for a few dieticians to make believe that they are useful for something with their science and to impose abherent regimes on a few "patients" who will continue to be so to the extent that it is not the case. individual who is taken into account but the disease, that is to say a localized manifestation expressing nothing other than a local weakness not representative of a general weakness.
the table is well done, what creates confusion is to bring in a volume while the comparisons are made on the weight, two different concepts. But, because there is a but, the consumer fills his plate with a volume and not a weight, so he does not take into account the composition, nor his needs but only his appetite. However, these quantitative notions are only useful for a few dieticians to make believe that they are useful for something with their science and to impose abherent regimes on a few "patients" who will continue to be so to the extent that it is not the case. individual who is taken into account but the disease, that is to say a localized manifestation expressing nothing other than a local weakness not representative of a general weakness.
0 x
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
hi janic,
I really like your way of saying things ... And yes this confusion is created by the use of the two concepts that are weight and volume ...
thank you for this clarification when it comes to the real usefulness of this quantitative concept.
I finally understand that it is normal that I did not understand anything at the beginning, but that it is normal, so everything is fine;) ...
and say that basically I was just trying to find out if it was more desirable to eat raw or cooked spinach.
in my idea the flood is better, but have told me that no it is not good except the young shoots. So I wanted to check ...
the rest is marked here;) ...
assessment I eat both raw and steamed (not together of course) ...
like that no jealous and I like in both forms ...
But it is true that putting figures and incomprehensible tables is part of what I call technical esotericism, which pushes to say that one cannot do it alone, and that suddenly it gives "a certain form of "credit to the dietitian who thereby become" scientifically "credible on a subject where he is initially on a bad road when it comes to being treated as you said ....
I really like your way of saying things ... And yes this confusion is created by the use of the two concepts that are weight and volume ...
thank you for this clarification when it comes to the real usefulness of this quantitative concept.
I finally understand that it is normal that I did not understand anything at the beginning, but that it is normal, so everything is fine;) ...
and say that basically I was just trying to find out if it was more desirable to eat raw or cooked spinach.
in my idea the flood is better, but have told me that no it is not good except the young shoots. So I wanted to check ...
the rest is marked here;) ...
assessment I eat both raw and steamed (not together of course) ...
like that no jealous and I like in both forms ...
But it is true that putting figures and incomprehensible tables is part of what I call technical esotericism, which pushes to say that one cannot do it alone, and that suddenly it gives "a certain form of "credit to the dietitian who thereby become" scientifically "credible on a subject where he is initially on a bad road when it comes to being treated as you said ....
0 x
the ideal is to eat it raw and cooked at the same meal. (this is valid for all vegetables and fruits). Indeed, any cooked food causes digestive leukocytosis (reaction to an attack) by lack of a "living" enzymatic complex destroyed by cooking. The raw-cooked complementarity reduces, or even cancels, this leukocytosis. Then the spinach is rich in nitrates (even more in "modern" culture) which by oxidizing transforms into nitrites (toxic) therefore quickly consume cooked spinach.hack wrote:assessment I eat both raw and steamed (not together of course) ...
like that no jealous and I like in both forms ...
0 x
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Janic wrote:the ideal is to eat it raw and cooked at the same meal. (this is valid for all vegetables and fruits). Indeed, any cooked food causes digestive leukocytosis (reaction to an attack) by lack of a "living" enzymatic complex destroyed by cooking. The raw-cooked complementarity reduces, or even cancels, this leukocytosis. Then the spinach is rich in nitrates (even more in "modern" culture) which by oxidizing transforms into nitrites (toxic) therefore quickly consume cooked spinach.hack wrote:assessment I eat both raw and steamed (not together of course) ...
like that no jealous and I like in both forms ...
It's not bad the idea of mixing raw and cooked ...!
On the other hand, we shouldn't panic everyone, nothing proves that nitrates transform into nitrites, it was suspected in the 80s, but it never really worked.
If you have a connection, it must have interested more than one.
Honestly, I see that there are other priorities before I get there. Am i wrong
0 x
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1155
- Registration: 21/06/09, 01:02
- Location: Britain BZH powaaa
- x 2
evening re;).
thank you for the links, and yes indeed I am starting to read the subject vegeta * isme, which begins with an add one made by moderation ... actually it starts strong eh obamot ... scorched head;) Swiss: p, I'm going to call you the Swiss boington grandpa;)
Just eat them quickly after cooking, whoever panics did not read well;) ....
I don't understand who you're talking to or what you're asking for there ???
Could you develop please ?
thank you for the links, and yes indeed I am starting to read the subject vegeta * isme, which begins with an add one made by moderation ... actually it starts strong eh obamot ... scorched head;) Swiss: p, I'm going to call you the Swiss boington grandpa;)
On the other hand, we shouldn't panic everyone, nothing proves that nitrates transform into nitrites, it was suspected in the 80s, but it never really worked.
Just eat them quickly after cooking, whoever panics did not read well;) ....
Honestly, I see that there are other priorities before I get there. Am i wrong
I don't understand who you're talking to or what you're asking for there ???
Could you develop please ?
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 33 Replies
- 4875 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
22/11/23, 15:20A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 134 Replies
- 12892 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
28/05/23, 06:33A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 18 Replies
- 3691 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
28/08/22, 23:28A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 9 Replies
- 1901 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
16/08/22, 23:35A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 35 Replies
- 6378 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
07/08/23, 12:38A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : gegyx and 143 guests