Health, the real dangers of 5G? Physiology and psychology

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by plasmanu » 24/01/20, 21:05

Sitting is perfect : Wink: 2 € is neither 3G nor 4G nor 5G
There remains wifi, bluetooth, mail, infrared on the Xiaomi
2 € is 50MB per month, I even recommend 2G, or block the data otherwise it stings
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by Exnihiloest » 24/01/20, 21:29

plasmanu wrote:Sitting is perfect : Wink: 2 € is neither 3G nor 4G nor 5G
There remains wifi, bluetooth, mail, infrared on the Xiaomi
2 € is 50MB per month, I even recommend 2G, or block the data otherwise it stings

wifi + bluetooth + infrared + 2G, what an overdose, but you're going to commit suicide.

The waves affect everyone but the old ones first because they are more fragile. Many elderly people die and they had a cell phone. This is proof of danger, isn't it? : Lol:
0 x
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by plasmanu » 24/01/20, 21:39

And when you plug in a wired headset you have a real radio: the headset serves as an antenna, there is gps, the compass, a gyroscope ... the temperature not yet nor the barometric pressure but it gives the time
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
User avatar
thibr
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 723
Registration: 07/01/18, 09:19
x 269

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by thibr » 24/01/20, 22:30

there is better than 2 €
1.90€ : Mrgreen:
https://www.symamobile.com/forfait?path=forfait.html
Flat rate 1.90 €
Calls: 2H in France and DOM and from Europe
SMS / MMS: unlimited in France and DOM and from Europe
Internet: 1 GB in France including 700 MB from Europe and the DOM
0 x
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by plasmanu » 24/01/20, 22:55

It stings quickly ... MNVO orange
"Syma Mobile, trade name of the company Symacom, is an operator of virtual mobile network of Orange. Syma Mobile offers traditional mobile plans but also prepaid cards."
Screenshot_2020-01-24-22-51-03-104_com.android.chrome.jpg
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by plasmanu » 24/01/20, 23:04

GuyGadebois wrote:It was just to say that this arms race leaves me cold.

So a lot of CO2 in the future. : Wink:
The servers should not progress. Nor lower their electrical consumption.
Because if we increase the power by lowering consumption, we are depriving ourselves of 4 times less consumption if we stay in the state without doing anything. (Every 18 months).
If we increase the gross power but we want to keep the same initial power, it is mechanically 4 times less than W, it is simple however.
Keep your old blunderbuss, your chair and your keyboard, but you'll find that there is still a problem in the equation : Wink:
I plan to buy a PC burned at 0nm which consumes 0W in 2032
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by GuyGadebois » 25/01/20, 00:02

plasmanu wrote:I plan to buy a PC burned at 0nm which consumes 0W in 2032

I plan to wait until 2047 because my PC will provide energy for the whole house and bring me breakfast in bed.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by plasmanu » 25/01/20, 03:40

: Mrgreen: he understood
GuyGadebois wrote:I plan to wait until 2047 because my PC will provide energy for the whole house and bring me breakfast in bed.

: Mrgreen: Ah the future, it's been 10 years already.
Today I always have to get up at night to urinate : Mrgreen:
More seriously for this escalation:
At the end of the XNUMXth century, I was against Intel and for AMD.
Against internet explorer and for Firefox.
Visceral against Apple and for the PC.
Then against PlayStation and for XBOX (another fairly close reason)
...
You should never leave a monopoly.
But Google has always been my best friend : Wink:

The power curve in sky blue is stable on 100w on the Moore scale, so 0W it was a trap : Oops:
But you understood that arriving at 0 it becomes negative, it's a good start, you may replace your 500W power supply before 2047 naughty polluter sitting
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
User avatar
thibr
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 723
Registration: 07/01/18, 09:19
x 269

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by thibr » 25/01/20, 09:01

0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Health, the real dangers of 5G?




by Exnihiloest » 25/01/20, 11:20

thibr wrote:there is Qwant rather than Goo ...
https://www.qwant.com/
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwant

But it is not the same result, neither in relevance nor in quantity.
There is also https://duckduckgo.com/ , which respects us but with the same faults as Qwant except perhaps for the search for torrents, being less subservient than Google, it seems, to the demands of "rights holders". But hey, with Google, you also have to know how to use the signs and keywords of their advanced search, and we eliminate the superfluous that hides the results we are looking for, which are often lost in the jumble.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 250 guests