The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Rajqawee
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 1322
Registration: 27/02/20, 09:21
Location: Occitania
x 577

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Rajqawee » 04/02/22, 11:54

Janic wrote:izyMENTROP
Janic, it is no less concrete and real but more representative than the raw figures that you like.
Oh good? Can you tell me what numbers I like? : Shock:


The 2 and the 9. And don't deny it.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Janic » 04/02/22, 11:56

RAJ
The 2 and the 9. And don't deny it.
:?:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Rajqawee
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 1322
Registration: 27/02/20, 09:21
Location: Occitania
x 577

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Rajqawee » 04/02/22, 11:57

Janic wrote:RAJ
The 2 and the 9. And don't deny it.
:?:


It's the problem of the writing, sometimes it doesn't pass the joke. Or was it not funny!
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Janic » 04/02/22, 12:44

paradise
It's the problem of the writing, sometimes it doesn't pass the joke. Or was it not funny!
however this could have been the case, if only because I would have lacked clarity in what I am expressing.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 04/02/22, 12:47

izentrop wrote:Janic, it is no less concrete and real but more representative than the raw figures that you like. : Wink:

And the other one who still hasn't understood anything. So go watch Derrick in replay/streaming instead of drooling like a varan...
Not raw.JPG
Pas brut.JPG (101.53 KiB) Viewed 1254 times
Raw.JPG
Brut.JPG (98.11 KiB) Viewed 1254 times

The non-raw figures are, as can be seen, extremely more representative than the raw figures. : Mrgreen:
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9772
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by sicetaitsimple » 04/02/22, 15:49

Obamot wrote:I have to tell you in which language that vaccination does not work :?:


In French, for example? Extract from the DREES study published today:

"Between December 27, 2021 and January 23, 2022, the 8% of unvaccinated people in the French population aged 20 or over represent:
- 15% of positive PCR tests in symptomatic people;
- 35% of admissions to conventional hospitalization with Covid-19;
- 48% of admissions to critical care with Covid-19;
- 44% of deaths after hospitalization with Covid-19."


https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr ... s-cas-puis
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Obamot » 04/02/22, 16:57

With loaded stats you only make reality lie, again the DREES, when the reality is this:

543D4A8F-6244-44AC-B7DB-31AF5412050D.jpeg
543D4A8F-6244-44AC-B7DB-31AF5412050D.jpeg (401.08 KiB) Viewed 1196 times


This is clearly an admission of failure of the vaccination policy. Why? I don't see why in 2 countries that share a border, the situation should be so different. And as it is, it isn't. We can clearly see what is remote-controlled and from where...

The reality is still this:

8831B4C0-8A62-43B6-B3BC-CE8F73271EF6.jpeg
8831B4C0-8A62-43B6-B3BC-CE8F73271EF6.jpeg (305.29 Kio) Consulté 1196 fois

https://www.radiolac.ch/actualite/les-q ... des-jeudi/

This means that vaccination has failed in the sense that it has become OBSOLETE like all freedom-killing measures, which is why the article has been modified, it was too eloquent, OBSOLETE, including the pass which is no longer justified and therefore no longer useful. OBSOLETE in view of the populations who have understood and who are rising up (go ahead dude, close your eyes, close...)

It is totally impossible to say whether the current situation is to the benefit of the vaccine or not, but everything had been carefully done not to make a control possible - except in Spain - and we only understood that no was not to be put to the benefit of the vaccine, neither there nor elsewhere, since so many governments are abandoning measures that are no longer justified linked to the pseudo vaccine protection. We understand that it is NOT the vaccine that triggers this, because it would have happened much sooner (especially in Israel) but that it is indeed the drop in pathogenicity of the current variants which is the cause of the lifting of the measures (and also the explosion of pharmacovigilance cases)

More serious, but convergent, some media have modified the content of their articles... The link I give above, I had already given it, health-pollution-prevention / coronavirus-covid-19-real-time-epidemic-map-t16331-6260.html # p489852 but the publisher bluewin has corrected the content. A scandal, we must not show too much that vaccines do not work, so we change the narrative (bluewin depends on Swisscom, ATS, therefore depends on OFCOM, therefore on the Confederation...)

So parallel to the above, some elected officials wet up to their necks are holding double talk, trying to get out of it, and it's only just begun, heads are going to roll... Double talk, but you're only taking the part that suits you.
Here's how you spread yourself out once again (of course you'll deny, you'll find a trick...)

It doesn't matter, you screwed up for 2 years doing that!

You realize that it's 2 years wasted in your life, 2 years of lies, 2 years of manipulation, 2 years of fake news, 2 years of a puppet government's henchman, 2 years of pity, 2 years of shame in full view of all.
It's your choice TDC.
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9772
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by sicetaitsimple » 04/02/22, 17:39

Do not feel obliged to lay 3 screen pages completely off topic on the pretext that I copied 5 lines of the latest statistics published today, bringing elements relating to the title of the thread.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Christophe » 04/02/22, 17:49

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:The non-raw figures are, as can be seen, extremely more representative than the raw figures. : Mrgreen:


Aye it fucks!! Certainly thanks to the vaccination!!!! : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The legend of vaccine protection against serious covid forms is called into question!




by Janic » 04/02/22, 17:50

simplet »04/02/22, 18:39
Do not feel obliged to lay 3 screen pages completely off topic on the pretext that I copied 5 lines of the latest statistics published today, bringing elements relating to the title of the thread.
except that you are not "forced" to post biased information, unless you are paid for?.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Google [Bot] and 252 guests