Ahmed wrote:ABC, you write:uh ..
GPS would not work with a flat earth theory ...
and the computer you are using is concrete proof that scientific theories produce "much more" than wacky conspiracy theories.
I am afraid that you did not understand the content of my message well: I do not at any time question the performative reality of science, only that it is inappropriate to take a comprehensive look at it; it is not a deficiency on his part, but an area which escapes him by definition. You will also note that, far from supporting conspiracy theories (in the sense of generalized conspiracy, not of conspiracies in the restricted sense), I limit myself to examining their origins from a sociological point of view.
oh yes of course science is not going to pass judgment on itself, moreover not on other human domains. It effectively limits itself to providing effective recipes to achieve concrete goals, but it says nothing about the value of those goals, it can just as easily be used by "immoral" systems.