The dead of pollution

[sicetaitsimple]

Not for a fireplace closed to standards with direct air intake from the outside to the hearth.

Who do you answer? Not to me I think .....

[Ahmed]

I have the impression that there are, as it were, losses in discursive fluidics ...

[GuyGadebois]

I have the impression that there are, as it were, losses in discursive fluidics ...

Thinning, if you don't mind. Or fluidity, possibly ...

[Ahmed]

... and fluidity?

[GuyGadebois]

... and fluidity?

Leave Arielle Dombasle alone ....
In any case it seems to me to be a free and first-rate technique to avoid damage due to xylophagous or "xylophilic" insects and which avoids having to resort to chemical shit.

[ABC2019]

......... for the same flow, ..............but the amount of water supplied will be the same..

Fluidics is powerful! For the same flow, the amount of water will be the same (in bold in the original text).

whereas for a different flow, the quantity of water (or air) will not be the same !!

as is the case between an open hearth and a closed hearth ...

[GuyGadebois]

And that the air is compressible, and not the water, and blah, and blah ... it's going 5mn, huh

[Christophe]

We have a first figure on the effects of confinement: 11 fewer premature pollution deaths in Europe ...

[Macro]

That's what I said ... Count the coconut dead .... But that's 11 less by pollution ... two or three hundred less at work, how many anins on the roads ... You go see the natural increase curve it will be positive ...

[Christophe]

... You will see the natural increase curve it will be positive ...

In Europe I'm not sure ...

But in China, with 25 deaths estimated per month pollution, that's for sure ...even if the official Chinese figures of victims of coronavirus 2019 are divided by 10 compared to reality !!!!