The dead of pollution

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The dead of pollution




by Janic » 24/02/20, 18:23

voui voui and whether there is an opening of several m2 on the room or of some cm2, it does not make a difference on the flow, it is well known ...
Fluidics does not seem to be your strong point. When using a water hose the fluid pressure, for the same flow, will be more or less important depending on the output section and therefore a more or less high speed too, but the amount of water supplied will be the same.. It is the same for an air flow! system used for forging bellows.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: The dead of pollution




by GuyGadebois » 24/02/20, 18:25

Janic wrote:Fluidics does not seem to be your strong point.

"Fluidics" does not exist.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The dead of pollution




by sicetaitsimple » 24/02/20, 18:36

Janic wrote:......... for the same flow, ..............but the amount of water supplied will be the same..


Fluidics is powerful! For the same flow, the amount of water will be the same (in bold in the original text).
Last edited by sicetaitsimple the 24 / 02 / 20, 18: 39, 1 edited once.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: The dead of pollution




by GuyGadebois » 24/02/20, 18:38

sicetaitsimple wrote:Fluidics is powerful! For the same flow, the amount of water will be the same.

Here, tonight I'm going to cook a soufflé .... from a forge.
Last edited by GuyGadebois the 24 / 02 / 20, 18: 44, 1 edited once.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963

Re: The dead of pollution




by Ahmed » 24/02/20, 18:41

Not very elegant to cut a text to make believe that the repetition, educational process, would be a tautological reasoning ...
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The dead of pollution




by sicetaitsimple » 24/02/20, 18:58

Ahmed wrote:Not very elegant to cut a text to make believe that the repetition, educational process, would be a tautological reasoning ...


OK, original text: "When using a water pipe, the pressure of the fluid, for the same flow rate, will be more or less important depending on the outlet section and therefore a greater or lesser speed too, but the amount of water supplied will be the same. "

There it is not tautological, it is in the text. So what?
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The dead of pollution




by Janic » 24/02/20, 19:06

by Ahmed "24/02/20, 19:41

Not very elegant to cut a text to make believe that the repetition, educational process, would be a tautological reasoning ...
don't ask too much either!
@guy:
"Fluidics" does not exist. : : Arrowd:
Https: //www.cnrtl.fr/definition/fluidique
C. - TECHNOL. Specific to techniques for performing logical operations using the flow of fluids.

OK, original text: "When using a water pipe the pressure of the fluid, for the same flow, will be more or less important depending on the outlet section and therefore a greater or lesser speed too, but the quantity of water supplied will be the even."
There it is not tautological, it is in the text. So what?
Zorro arrived without hurrying .....! Long live the assumed tautology.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: The dead of pollution




by GuyGadebois » 24/02/20, 19:16

Janic wrote:"Fluidics" does not exist. : : Arrowd:
Https: //www.cnrtl.fr/definition/fluidique
C. - TECHNOL. Specific to techniques for performing logical operations using the flow of fluids.


Fluidic: Adjective.
So "fluidics" does not exist. CQFD
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The dead of pollution




by sicetaitsimple » 24/02/20, 19:28

Good, a little development anyway for fans of "fluidics".

In a closed hearth, all of the admitted air contributes (more or less) to combustion. Normally, air (and its oxygen) is allowed for both primary and in some cases secondary combustion where it is needed.

In an open fireplace, the same air flow is necessary for combustion (it only depends on the amount of wood), but a significant amount is also admitted into the fireplace without participating in the combustion in any way, just because of the draft and convection phenomena. Hence significant losses at the chimney, the flow of "fumes" is much greater, even if it is a mixture of combustion gases and more or less heated air.

We are hot in front, and cold behind .....
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: The dead of pollution




by izentrop » 24/02/20, 19:42

Not for a fireplace closed to standards with direct air intake from the outside to the hearth.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 301 guests