The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Janic » 11/07/17, 14:51

Statistically, I have never had a peri-cardiac stenosis ... it is a great satisfaction for me!
statistically too, you escaped it beautiful!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Ahmed » 11/07/17, 17:16

Well, yes and no ... In fact, it is quite common and when the symptoms (if there are symptoms!) Are detected in time, there are effective "plumbing" techniques and, what is more, instantly effective. , which is not so common in medicine ...
It is somewhat comparable (in some cases) to a diesel engine whose filter clogs: the engine chokes as soon as it is called upon and runs smoothly at idle ... until the idle is no longer tenable: it is then "enough" to release the food so that everything returns immediately to normal. It is then a tasty pleasure to be able to walk freely at a good pace ... a very simple thing, but never appreciated at its true value without its deprivation!
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3791
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1311

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by pedrodelavega » 11/07/17, 20:05

Janic wrote:
Better to base yourself on figures / statistics than on simple testimonials selected here or there ...
are you blocked or what?
When a phenomenon is denied a priori, what statistics can be made on something that has been decreed as not being able to exist ?! You who are fortunate with infused science: explain how we do it!
As with everything else in all areas: We do an orderly and reproducible experiment.
"We do science with facts, as we make a house with stones; but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house."

Janic wrote:Then people in real life do not live from figures and statistics, but from facts, lived experience, concrete experiences which are transmitted from one to the other, not by the intermediary of a system which makes negationism in principle ... or out of fear of losing your dominant position.
People in "real" life, through testimonies that they pass between followers, also believe that a dowser has a gift for finding water, that magnetizers heal, that the moon influences vegetable gardens, etc. etc.

Janic wrote:Finally of above sites are OFFICIAL references to which you and your boyfriends are supposed to refer. But if you prefer virtual paper towels it's your choice!
The sites I mentioned?
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Janic » 11/07/17, 21:01

Janic wrote:
Better to base yourself on figures / statistics than on simple testimonials selected here or there ...

are you blocked or what?
When a phenomenon is denied a priori, what statistics can be made on something that has been decreed as not being able to exist ?! You who are fortunate with infused science: explain how we do it!

As with everything else in all areas: We do an orderly and reproducible experiment.
"We do science with facts, as we make a house with stones; but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house."

already seen! When these facts are assembled by masons it makes them houses. And not all masons build these houses in the same way or with the same materials; the stones have been replaced by reinforced concrete and at the same time others are still building with stones.
now if the former deny the latter or vice versa, that ends all discussion. The H has its own materials (like the A) in an orderly and reproducible manner by ITS own masons.

Janic wrote:
Then people in real life do not live from figures and statistics, but from facts, lived experience, concrete experiences which are transmitted from one to the other, not through a system that makes Holocaust denial on principle ... or for fear of losing your dominant position.

People in "real" life, through testimonies that they pass between followers, also believe that a dowser has a gift for finding water, that magnetizers heal, that the moon influences vegetable gardens, etc. etc.
when they believe it is because they have verified it from generation to generation, long before your pseudo science gets involved.
Janic wrote:
Finally, the sites mentioned above are OFFICIAL references to which you and your little friends are supposed to refer. But if you prefer virtual paper towels it's your choice!
The sites I cited ?.

reread what is written
a) "the sites mentioned above" not YOUR sites
b) are references official .But you can prefer bogus journalist references in search of false and false papers.
c) where you and your boyfriends are SUPPOSED refer you! BUT WITHOUT OBLIGATION OF course!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Exnihiloest » 11/07/17, 21:17

Janic wrote:... But you can prefer bogus journalist references in search of false and false papers.
c) where you and your boyfriends are SUPPOSED refer you! BUT WITHOUT OBLIGATION OF course!

A conspiracy of journalists and "buddies"? !!!
We need to tell us more.

Or would it not rather come from a "divine" will?
0 x
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3791
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1311

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by pedrodelavega » 11/07/17, 21:28

Janic wrote:
People in "real" life, through testimonies that they pass between followers, also believe that a dowser has a gift for finding water, that magnetizers heal, that the moon influences vegetable gardens, etc. etc.
when they believe it is because they have verified it from generation to generation, long before your pseudo science gets involved.

The believer does not check, he believes. The scientist verifies and has since verified these cited examples: They have all been refuted but, even today, people believe them by word of mouth and other testimonies between followers. No one can ever prevent it:

"The facts do not penetrate the world where our beliefs live, they did not give birth to them, they do not destroy them; they can inflict on them the most constant denials without weakening them - Mr. PROUST"
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Janic » 12/07/17, 09:40

Janic wrote:
People in "real" life, through testimonies that they pass between followers, also believe that a dowser has a gift for finding water, that magnetizers heal, that the moon influences vegetable gardens, etc. etc.

when they believe it is because they have checked it from generation to generation, long before your pseudo science gets involved.

The believer does not check, he believes.
like you? but you've got it all wrong! No he checks first (I hope it is the same for you otherwise it is depressing naivety), which makes him believe then. But as it is a world of functioning that you ignore and prefer to ignore, it encourages you to add to your ignorance endless conn ... anneries.
The scientist verifies and has since verified these cited examples: They have all been refuted

What verification, what refutation since they are in a priori negationism and that these are areas where they are incompetent. Difficult to refute something that these gentlemen consider nonexistent, a priori!
But, even today, people believe it via word of mouth and other testimonies between followers. No one can ever prevent it:

You really believe in your nonsense that is worth many others! You hold the word of mouth, compulsory and without sharing, of the testimonies of the cures of cancers, but you have a lapse of memory for the 146.000 dead who were abandoned by your followers. No one can ever prevent it:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Exnihiloest » 14/07/17, 22:15

Janic wrote:
The believer does not check, he believes.
like you? but you've got it all wrong! No he checks first

This is not true, the believer does not verify anything, this is the reason why, while engineers all over the world use the same Maxwell equations, believers all believe in different things according to the regions of the earth, and often incompatible with each other.

Or provide us with statistics on the rate of prayer, or a video documentary filming life after death.

The scientist verifies and has since verified these cited examples: They have all been refuted

What verification, what refutation since they are in a priori negationism and that these are areas where they are incompetent.

It's wrong. The scientist gives no opinion on God, because what is not observable, directly or indirectly, is not scientific. The believer contests what science shows.
In addition, the believer denies scientific evidence, not because he would leave his area of ​​competence, but because he has none. The believer is no more competent in religion than anyone.
He is competent, and still not always, only in the rites and the recitation by heart of the creeds of his chapel, and in the sophisms in support of his quibbles.

Anyone can "enter into religion". Pascal has already provided the method: "Get stupid [through rites, prayer], faith will come in addition ».
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Janic » 15/07/17, 09:04

Janic wrote:
The believer does not check, he believes.

like you? but you've got it all wrong! No he checks first

This is not true, the believer does not verify anything, this is the reason why, while engineers all over the world use the same Maxwell equations, believers all believe in different things according to the regions of the earth, and often incompatible with each other.

Oh the funny! You want to reduce knowledge to the only materialism that reassures you.
The cited cases of firewalls are not scientifically explained, but are an indisputable reality.
Or provide us with statistics on the rate of prayer, or a video documentary filming life after death.

Re funny! The cases of achievement of anything would be useful for what since, a priori, you would challenge them as for H.? It would be like giving jam to the pigs!
The scientist verifies and has since verified these cited examples: They have all been refuted

What verification, what refutation since they are in a priori negationism and that these are areas where they are incompetent.

It's wrong. The scientist gives no opinion on God, because what is not observable, directly or indirectly, is not scientific. The believer contests what science shows.
Furthermore the believer denies scientific evidence, not because he would leave his area of ​​competence, but because he has none. The believer is no more competent in religion than anyone.

One more connery!
Have you ever heard of Robert Boyle father of physical chemistry; Blaise Pascal and his contribution to statistical studies; biologist Carl von Linné and his classification of species and genera of living things; Sir Isaac Newton who established the principles of integral calculus and the laws governing planetary movements, Darwin, etc. all believers and who are the basis of these scientific evidences. Your hatred is matched only by your ignorance.
He is competent, and still not always, only in the rites and the recitation by heart of the creeds of his chapel, and in the sophisms in support of his quibbles.
Because you are competent in a field that you deny exist?
Anyone can "enter into religion". Pascal has already provided the method for this: "Be stupid [through rites, prayer], faith will come in addition".

who also said " the object of all things should have as its object the establishment and greatness of religion "And his discourse on method
Pascal therefore has a Protestant reflex by contesting all the "cinema" which imprisons the believer and from which he must free himself, the impermanence of the Buddhists, but as you know nothing about it you mix everything ... as usual with the ignorant! : roll:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963

Re: The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines




by Ahmed » 15/07/17, 09:35

I think that Pascal by that meant a renunciation of the ego, as a condition for access to spirituality ...
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 291 guests