The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines

[pedrodelavega]

They say it to each other, but do not say it to the official system. Bis repetita !!!!!!

And it is these testimonies between followers that allow you to assess the evolution of healings by alternative medicines?

"We do science with facts, as we make a house with stones; but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house.- HP"

[Janic]

Janic wrote:
They say it to each other, but do not say it to the official system. Bis repetita !!!!!!

And it is these testimonies between followers that allow you to assess the evolution of healings by alternative medicines?

Hi, hi! and how do you know how to evaluate the evolution of cures by conventional medicine. We already know how to evaluate the non-cures of it, like the 146.000 who die from cancer!

[pedrodelavega]

And it is these testimonies between followers that allow you to assess the evolution of healings by alternative medicines?

Hi, hi! and how do you know how to evaluate the evolution of cures by conventional medicine. We already know how to evaluate the non-cures of it, like the 146.000 who die from cancer!

The answer is in the question and everywhere on the internet (except conspicuous sites obviously):

http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/1066 ... 87_fre.pdf
http://www.slate.fr/lien/54863/mort-mon ... nfographie
http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/publ ... te_web.pdf
http://dailygeekshow.com/chiffres-maladies-meurtrieres/
http://www.lemonde.fr/sante/article/201 ... 51302.html
https://www.ligue-cancer.net/article/63 ... es-cancers
etc., etc...

[Janic]

The answer is in the question and everywhere on the internet (except conspicuous sites obviously):

Have you read and analyzed them all? Yes No?
Then I don't use, never other sites than those that are official, at the end of analysis, to have common and indisputable sources for all readers, and not newspaper articles in search of sensational paper, therefore:

http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/1066 ... 87_fre.pdf

it is a global document therefore of secondary or even zero interest concerning France

http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/publ ... te_web.pdf

There yes, it's the only official site concerning France and we are in France and if you want to discuss this one, only, you will have taken a big step out of your usual sectarian discourse!

https://www.ligue-cancer.net/article/63 ... es-cancers

Although accessory, since it takes its info on the official site above, it presents interesting graphics for those who know nothing about it, like you for example.
etc., etc...

[Exnihiloest]

...
Then I don't use, never other sites than those that are official, at the end of analysis, to have common and indisputable sources ...

Selection bias
"selection made by a person of the only studies which go in the direction of his certainties".

[Janic]

Selection bias
"selection made by a person of the only studies which go in the direction of his certainties".

already said, but what do you want, with the example you give, it was difficult for me to do better! At least I am not referring to newspaper articles in need of sensational paper that you love so much!

[Janic]

definitely i'm getting too slow to relax

Selection bias
"Selection bias
"selection made by a person of the only studies which go in the direction of his certainties". ".

It's funny because it's your alter ego who actually, how do you say ??? ..... a Bias of selection!
"selection made by a person of the only studies which go in the direction of his certainties". Would he have turned his jacket over, always on the safe side! Or else only selection bias is not when it goes in your direction ?! touch him in two words!

http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/1066 ... 87_fre.pdf
http://www.slate.fr/lien/54863/mort-mon ... nfography
http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/publ ...te_web.pdf
http://dailygeekshow.com/chiffres-maladies-meurtrieres/
http://www.lemonde.fr/sante/article/201 ... 51302.html
https://www.ligue-cancer.net/article/63 ... are-cancers

you may prefer to make your selections on the pendulum like your avatar!

[pedrodelavega]

Better to base yourself on figures / statistics than on simple testimonials selected here or there ...

[Janic]

Better to base yourself on figures / statistics than on simple testimonials selected here or there ...

are you blocked or what?
When a phenomenon is denied a priori, what statistics can be made on something that has been decreed as not being able to exist ?! You who are fortunate with infused science: explain how we do it!
Then people in real life do not live from figures and statistics, but from facts, lived experience, concrete experiences which are transmitted from one to the other, not by the intermediary of a system which makes negationism in principle ... or out of fear of losing your dominant position.
Finally of above sites are OFFICIAL references to which you and your boyfriends are supposed to refer. But if you prefer virtual paper towels it's your choice!

[Ahmed]

Statistically, I have never had a peri-cardiac stenosis ... it is a great satisfaction for me!