https://www.econologie.com/forums/mutation-d ... t8804.html
virus mutation
Swine flu: 60 million Europeans vaccinated
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
It's very funny because despite the mutation of the virus "they believe" that the vaccine is still effective. Fortunately it would be stupid to have to throw everything away and redo others
Ah and that's good because the mutation of the virus makes it a little more worrying because it clings more easily in the lungs and can give more complications.
We are happy to hear it, it just falls when we would have to panic the population a little more so that they consider that ultimately the virus is more dangerous than the vaccine
This aprem I made an appointment with occupational medicine, I voluntarily took my health book (besides I had trouble finding it), because I am not up to date on any vaccine. I want to laugh
Ah and that's good because the mutation of the virus makes it a little more worrying because it clings more easily in the lungs and can give more complications.
We are happy to hear it, it just falls when we would have to panic the population a little more so that they consider that ultimately the virus is more dangerous than the vaccine
This aprem I made an appointment with occupational medicine, I voluntarily took my health book (besides I had trouble finding it), because I am not up to date on any vaccine. I want to laugh
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
if the mutation accelerates too much, the vaccine will fall into the water
well almost
part of the virus will leave with the current vaccine but some residual will remain
as this virus is multi strain the mutation will operate in multi strain too
so from this virus can appear several different diseases
or several different viruses
it took a long time to make this vaccine
there was only one
if the mutation results in a different result, more than one vaccine will be needed for the same virus
the milestone of 6 months has passed
I recall the theory of 6 months
6 months is the time to go from winter to summer
therefore an aggressive phase (summer)
in the passive and incubation phase (winter)
in 6 months the virus passes from the northern hemisphere to the south
the problem here is that h1n1 is the composition of several viruses
now you have to know which part of the virus this mutates
imagine that there are only 3
A + + .B .C
if a become stronger than b and c it will take the same vaccine plus a variant which weakens A
same for b and c
now imagine a variant where A and B get stronger
, etc.
there is a multitude of possible options for transfers
so a lot of different vaccine
well almost
part of the virus will leave with the current vaccine but some residual will remain
as this virus is multi strain the mutation will operate in multi strain too
so from this virus can appear several different diseases
or several different viruses
it took a long time to make this vaccine
there was only one
if the mutation results in a different result, more than one vaccine will be needed for the same virus
the milestone of 6 months has passed
I recall the theory of 6 months
6 months is the time to go from winter to summer
therefore an aggressive phase (summer)
in the passive and incubation phase (winter)
in 6 months the virus passes from the northern hemisphere to the south
the problem here is that h1n1 is the composition of several viruses
now you have to know which part of the virus this mutates
imagine that there are only 3
A + + .B .C
if a become stronger than b and c it will take the same vaccine plus a variant which weakens A
same for b and c
now imagine a variant where A and B get stronger
, etc.
there is a multitude of possible options for transfers
so a lot of different vaccine
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
the problem here is not caused by a virus
according to some source this virus is the combination of several
so we are not attacking a virus but several grouping into one
I would not like to be in the place of the heads of the pharmaceutical laboratory who must bet in advance on the future mutation of this one if
because the game is very random and I repeat it multiple
a little the grandfather who looks at this offspring and have to bet on which of these offspring will have the most children when they are all still children
according to some source this virus is the combination of several
so we are not attacking a virus but several grouping into one
I would not like to be in the place of the heads of the pharmaceutical laboratory who must bet in advance on the future mutation of this one if
because the game is very random and I repeat it multiple
a little the grandfather who looks at this offspring and have to bet on which of these offspring will have the most children when they are all still children
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Yes that we agree. This is not the problem. Man is perfectly armed to fight against viruses (viruses are almost as old as bacteria, so they have mutated for almost 4 billion years ... it's not new).
What is at stake is not the dangerousness of viruses but:
- adjuvants that severely disrupt the immune system, to the point that it can be fatal (... just excuse ...).
- the fact that we make believe that the solution is in the vaccines while prevention we no longer talk about it ...
- the fact that we manipulate crowds who do not want vaccines by artificially creating shortages to create an attraction ...
- the fact that the doubt about the bacterial (ie viral) origin of diseases is not proven in "healthy" subjects.
So the virus mutates and the vaccines already produced are no longer suitable is obvious from the start. We are not far from the large-scale scam. Of course some mandarins in the medical world are ready to argue that even a relatively osolete vaccine would still be useful.
This is not wrong if we look at the angle of "firefighter" medicine that comes after the fire to put out the fire. So yes we will say no, because the vaccine is prevention. That would be true if we did not take advantage of it by the same to cause poisoning of the healthy with harmful substances which is INADMISSIBLE simply because of the principle of precautions.
Because basically, it still does not answer the essential question of research into the causes of the vulnerability of some to viruses, especially in industrialized countries, where people are precisely undernourished.
Find the mistake...
What is at stake is not the dangerousness of viruses but:
- adjuvants that severely disrupt the immune system, to the point that it can be fatal (... just excuse ...).
- the fact that we make believe that the solution is in the vaccines while prevention we no longer talk about it ...
- the fact that we manipulate crowds who do not want vaccines by artificially creating shortages to create an attraction ...
- the fact that the doubt about the bacterial (ie viral) origin of diseases is not proven in "healthy" subjects.
So the virus mutates and the vaccines already produced are no longer suitable is obvious from the start. We are not far from the large-scale scam. Of course some mandarins in the medical world are ready to argue that even a relatively osolete vaccine would still be useful.
This is not wrong if we look at the angle of "firefighter" medicine that comes after the fire to put out the fire. So yes we will say no, because the vaccine is prevention. That would be true if we did not take advantage of it by the same to cause poisoning of the healthy with harmful substances which is INADMISSIBLE simply because of the principle of precautions.
Because basically, it still does not answer the essential question of research into the causes of the vulnerability of some to viruses, especially in industrialized countries, where people are precisely undernourished.
Find the mistake...
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 101 Replies
- 21906 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
02/04/22, 13:26A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 17 Replies
- 15707 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
25/04/09, 21:10A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 248 guests