Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good nutrition and assimilation of nutrients

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by VetusLignum » 27/12/21, 14:09

Christophe wrote:Not really food but related anyway: we heard in spring 2020 that smokers were less affected by covid ...


It seems to me that this study was retracted for conflict of interest (with the tobacco industry)
https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj ... 4.full.pdf
1 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79116
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by Christophe » 27/12/21, 14:16

Thank you Vetus!

Retracted? As if by chance! : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:

What about alcohol? There is also a big lobby but it is less globalized it seems to me!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by Obamot » 05/02/22, 17:34

lives it. D scientifically recognized to fight against Covid-19

94D8D9B2-4513-4D7A-8027-E2F3BB623AD4.jpeg


Lack of vitamin D significantly increases danger levels


Israeli scientists say they have gathered the most compelling evidence to date that boosting vitamin D levels can help coronavirus patients reduce the risk of serious illness or death.

Researchers from Bar Ilan University and Galilee Medical Center say this vitamin has such a strong impact on disease severity that they can predict how people would behave if infected based on their age alone. and their vitamin D levels.

Lack of vitamin D significantly increases danger levels, they conclude in research published Thursday in the journal PLOS One.

The study is based on research conducted during the first two waves of the virus in Israel, before vaccines became widely available, and the doctors stressed that vitamin supplements were not a replacement for vaccines, but rather a means of prevention. to prevent the drop in immunity levels.

Vitamin D deficiency is endemic in the Middle East, including Israel, where nearly four in five people are deficient in this vitamin, according to a 2011 study.

By taking supplements before infection, however, researchers found that patients could avoid the worst effects of the disease.

"We found it remarkable, and striking, to see the difference in the chances of becoming seriously ill when you lack vitamin D compared to when you don't."said Dr. Amir Bashkin, an endocrinologist who was part of the research team.

He noted that his study was conducted before Omicron appeared, but said the coronavirus does not change fundamentally enough between variants to negate the effectiveness of vitamin D.

"What we see when vitamin D helps people with infections is a result of its effectiveness in boosting the immune system to deal with viral pathogens that attack the respiratory system.“, [he told The Times of Israel]: “This is as relevant for Omicron as for previous variants".

Health authorities in Israel and several other countries have recommended vitamin D supplements in response to the coronavirus pandemic, although data on its effectiveness has been scarce so far.
https://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/israel/1 ... sraelienne

And this, while criminal politicians in France, would like to prohibit us from selling it to the public
https://www.senat.fr/questions/base/202 ... 26178.html
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 05/02/22, 18:39

Obamot wrote:And this, while criminal politicians in France, would like to prohibit us from selling it to the public
https://www.senat.fr/questions/base/202 ... 26178.html

It's wrong.
This is to make information available to identify endocrine disruptors in a product. The decree provides that anyone marketing products containing substances with endocrine disruptor properties according to ANSES [National Health Security Agency] publishes the list of these products and the substances that each of them contains. This publication will be made in an open format allowing collaborative platforms to use this information and thus better inform the consumer.
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-datab ... 0&dLang=FR
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/ ... 0043964950
Afterwards, it's vicious because these decrees can initiate mistrust and rejection of a hormone recognized worldwide for its qualities.
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by Obamot » 05/02/22, 19:41

Thanks for taking me back. But if I were you, I wouldn't be so categorical.

This ban would be justified by the fact that vitamin D, taken in high doses, is an endocrine disruptor.

https://www.senat.fr/questions/base/201 ... 25400.html


I could be wrong but it seems to me that this is a slick way of heading towards putting vitamin D on the list of endocrine disruptors (EPs) or something, getting it banned by the tape, when precisely, in vitamin deficiencies. “D” the suspicions of certain researchers (that I know) relate to... endocrine disruptors! But nothing official.

This added to the fact that high doses are not justified, it is the same blow as to ban HCQ, one presents something inappropriate as a danger as an alibi to suppress it, whereas to maintain the healthy people, we rather look for small doses, one to two drops per day (2x 500Ui/day)

In view of the enormous doubt, the correct approach would be to launch a large international study to understand the CAUSES of this endemic vitamin D deficiency in populations, which would eliminate the need for supplementation in the vast majority of cases: and not this approach going to the opposite end which would consist in disqualifying it...

I would add that this proposal comes in a highly suspect context, which consists in deliberately preventing people from getting treatment. And this should be the subject of a criminal criminal complaint.
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by Obamot » 14/02/22, 22:34

Guy's attitude? Untenable.



But fortunately... Taaah Daaah

: Arrowd: Fact checking: TRUE : Arrowd:

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/2022020 ... 0109075015
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Severity of COVID VS trace elements, good diet and assimilation of nutrients




by Obamot » 15/02/22, 22:58



: Arrowd: Fact checking: True : Arrowd:

Who(?) has seen the slightest element of prevention on lifestyle and/or relating to the balance of the food bolus in this .PDF of the WHO and affecting the food sector, and not a criticism in the accomplice media and criminals :?: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .1-fre.pdf

From the WHO “com” for vaccinations, yes, there were some ad nauseam... And for prevention :?:

To find it, you had to document yourself at the FAO, but who relayed this confidential information in the media and why the FAO:
https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA8380FR/

The document is also tainted with lies

— “No food or nutritional supplement can prevent the covid-19 virus from infecting us”
0 x

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Bing [Bot] and 301 guests