Thanks for taking me back. But if I were you, I wouldn't be so categorical.
I could be wrong but it seems to me that this is a slick way of heading towards putting vitamin D on the list of endocrine disruptors (EPs) or something, getting it banned by the tape, when precisely, in vitamin deficiencies. “D” the suspicions of certain researchers (that I know) relate to... endocrine disruptors! But nothing official.
This added to the fact that high doses are not justified, it is the same blow as to ban HCQ, one presents something inappropriate as a danger as an alibi to suppress it, whereas to maintain the healthy people, we rather look for small doses, one to two drops per day (2x 500Ui/day)
In view of the enormous doubt, the correct approach would be to launch a large international study to understand the CAUSES of this endemic vitamin D deficiency in populations, which would eliminate the need for supplementation in the vast majority of cases: and not this approach going to the opposite end which would consist in disqualifying it...
I would add that this proposal comes in a highly suspect context, which consists in deliberately preventing people from getting treatment. And this should be the subject of a criminal criminal complaint.