RNA vaccine: the future

[Macro]

In the modern version, we call it "the click whore".

This kind of rude remarks are frowned upon by the administration of econology... Attention Remundo...

[Christophe]

This article is here to make Heidi.news foam

it's just one https://www.google.com/search?q=arn+vaccin+grippe

And ? What does that prove?

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi.news

In 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, heidi.news carried out a joint report with Léman bleu on conspiracy, by infiltrating a journalist among French-speaking conspiracy figures. The method used has sparked controversy and reactions from some fellow journalists. The people who were the subject of the report also consider the methods used by the two media as “unfair” and announce that they want to file a complaint.

See also: https://www.conspiracywatch.info/quand- ... keurs.html

When the conspiracy launches a campaign to smear "fact-checkers"

The inversion of values, a safe bet in 2022!

[Remundo]

This kind of rude remarks are frowned upon by the administration of econology... Attention Remundo...

it's well documented, maybe writing it down putaclick, it works better.

(Neologism) (Pejorative) (Internet) Qualifies an article or video whose title or summary is deliberately exaggerated in order to attract more readers or viewers. Qualifies a seductive title, enticing intended to cause a click.

[izentrop]

[Janic]

izmentrop
another placebo! People want to believe it so badly that enough is enough! and long live the placebos!

[Christophe]

We have seen what gives the real effectiveness of the RNA vaccine at supposedly 97%...if they start by promising only 44%...there is a chance that the effectiveness will be negative

Well, there will always be those who "believe" that it worked with the first one to get stung with the following ones...

ps: a vaccine is basically something against a pathogen... but we're more like a ready approximation with these crooks...

[Janic]

ps: a vaccine is basically something against a pathogen... but we're more like a ready approximation with these crooks..

. Assumed act against a future pathogen, but which is actually more belief than scientific fact.
Proof:
for more than a century, after Pasteur, no vaccine has not prevented or reduced any outbreaks as official statistics show.

[Christophe]

Don't do it again otherwise you're going to the corner!

[Obamot]

Ah yes, that's a clever fight against cancer without eliminating the causes: Môssieur prefers to expose himself to radiotherapy...

Hey! oooo yes, the mRNA vaccine works.

The data preclinical presented this Thursday, November 24 in Science show that this option must be taken into account

No double-blind randomized study results => trash
It's like the pre-prints... (remember) It's worth nothing, is that it...?
And it's on animals so extrapolating to humans is not valid.
Two of your favorite arguments against hydroxychloroquine in an attempt to invalidate it (remember?)

It is necessary to look carefully at the result of the discussions of these studies in "pre print" before jumping to the ceiling.
sante-pollution-prevention/les-avancees-de-la-lutte-contre-le-coronavis-t16395-1350.html?hilit=pr%C3%A9%20print#p440608

[...]

yes, a response letter to a pre print on Medrxiv… ridiculous, let’s move on

sante-pollution-prevention/demission-du-dr-raoult-partisan-de-la-chloroquine-du-conseil-scientifique-covid19-t16370-3970.html?hilit=pr%C3%A9%20print#p407683

A straightforward summary
HCQ [...] Is it effective against Covid-19?
[...] in vitro or on animals and on different viruses, sometimes positive results. Studies have also shown in vitro effects on SARS-Cov2 but very often these results are not found in vivo in humans.
In addition, 95% of treated patients showed no sign of severity.
health-pollution-prevention/resignation-of-dr-raoult-partisan-of-chloroquine-from-the-covid-scientific-council-t19-16370.html?hilit=animals#p1760

Look for the jester in bad faith....

[Remundo]

the sprinkler sprinkled.

it will lower the level of the dams...