Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 28/03/23, 18:18

Who are you talking about ? Coaches or patients?
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Janic » 28/03/23, 18:41

28/03/23, 18:18
guy
Who are you talking about ? Coaches or patients?
that's just playing dumb not to answer. Who am I talking about from the start? and of what? sports or cancer?
So what would you do if you found yourself in the same situation as them?
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 28/03/23, 18:42

I don't give a shit.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Obamot » 28/03/23, 19:33

..."nothing" but you're right about everything : Mrgreen:

You do not know how to read...? : Arrowd:
Janic wrote:
I don't even know what you're talking about
I am a bit of a subject who is on cancer...so take your time to read this well
(...) only on these last videos.
so I repeat to get your opinion: what would you have done in their situation? we'll see later![/i]

is that your literature?!
on what criteria can you say that these are vrp...without proof.
and so in their situation what would you have done!
it's Janic who doesn't know what you're talking about [•••]
He is not the only one : Mrgreen:
so stop mobbing those you don't agree with, and taking people for suckers : Evil:
you will see how you will understand faster
by rowing less hard... :P
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Janic » 28/03/23, 19:52

28/03/23, 18:42
guy
I don't give a shit.
well, it's not that hard to give birth to nothing. You don't know about yourself, but you know that they are only sales reps because they disturb your beliefs and your relative confidence in the system which can no longer do anything for the 157400 annual deaths from this pathology. Clearly you reproach them for not having wanted to die and you insult them by calling them VRP[*] to show your contempt for people refusing to go for a definitive walk in the grave. : Evil:

[*]quite respectable profession in itself in other circumstances.
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 28/03/23, 20:28

Bravo, beautiful delirium! Image
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Janic » 28/03/23, 21:00

28/03/23, 20:28
guy
Bravo, beautiful delirium!
you are also a master in this field so you know what you are talking about, except on the right topics!
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Obamot » 28/03/23, 21:15

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:I don't give a shit.

: Arrowd: : Arrowd: : Arrowd:
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Bravo, beautiful delirium!

Ah, his memory has come back to him _Image
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Janic » 29/03/23, 08:38

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
I don't give a shit. !

It's hard to face a problem of conscience, isn't it?
Having to choose between dying with certainty for one or disabled for life (or what remains of it) for the other; or another option that you hate a priori and in principle, it's not easy!
Indeed, statistically, one in 4 individuals will die of cancer, either (in a family of 4), themselves, a parent, a brother or a sister at one time or another, that's the current reality. . And as conventional medicine only succeeds in treating one out of two cancer patients, the others being destined for certain death, the future is not rosy for everyone!
Especially since adopting this last chance escape route; it is to find oneself all alone without the relative security of a well-oiled organization (in its functioning in the absence of its results) and in the midst of the disapproval of this system, of one's family, friends, etc... Not easy at all and you really have to want to live, despite everything, to dare to embark on this unknown (for the system in place) but less and less for the new generations of doctors who think ... it happens to them sometimes !
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13698
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1516
Contact :

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by izentrop » 07/04/23, 23:46

Doesn't work and has never worked.
Antoine Flahaut had tested it with the right method a long time ago on another virus...
... Yet they have one thing in common, they both worked on chloroquine. Professor Flahault experimented with chloroquine when he was in charge of the chikungunya epidemic in 2006. His team had found an exvivo antiviral power of chloroquine on cells infected with chikungunya. He thought he had an effective medicine there. Professor Flahaut had also made a communication on his experience in collaboration with the Marseille team. This communication had been taken up by a newspaper of the meeting which had headlined “A drug in sight!”.

It was then that the Minister of Health at the time Xavier Bertrand, very excited by this promising experience, summoned Flahault and his team to propose the next day an extension of the marketing of chloroquine in the indication of chikungunya. . It is true that the circumstances were exceptional, the epidemic had affected 40% of the inhabitants of Reunion. Flahaut's response as he recounts it was “Above all, don't do that Minister! If you do that, we'll never be able to confirm the effectiveness of chloroquine in patients with chikungunya, we need to do a clinical trial »

At first Xavier Bertrand did not understand, he thought that Flahault and his team were more motivated by research and the production of beautiful papers rather than by curing the sick. Xavier Bertrand finally accepted, and a formal clinical trial was carried out on humans and on macaques from Mauritius, which presented a disease quite similar to that of humans.Result of the races: no effectiveness, the disappointment of the team was enormous, to the extent of the certainty that it had to hold a good drug.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Remundo and 367 guests