izentrop wrote:Let's get back on topic... Apparently that's not the IHU yet.
A stranger who believes debunker in 2 tweets a scientific study trying to explain the possible mechanism of in vitro IVM on sars-cov2.
You don't come back to the subject and you try to create a diversion because it smells like pâté.
izentrop wrote:Anyone can do this kind of editing.robob wrote:Tell me Izy, the sourced elements brought by France Soir, you know the conspiracy blog rag, what do you think?
Given the level of dishonesty of these morons, even in court they will shrivel up like evils that they are these sandbox manipulators.
We calm down, we take a deep breath and we take a step back:
These published private messages accuse AFP, some of these employees, a LERM deputy, suspect collusion with general information, etc...
You can imagine that throwing all this out in public is taking enormous risks given the forces France Soir, Alzabert and Aberkane oppose.
It is obvious that they investigated to verify the authenticity of the facts and validated, with lawyers, what they could publish before doing so.
Ms. Daoust has also changed lawyers and is now defended by Me Protat of the Bonsens association: this is not insignificant.
The rest: the government will dissociate itself from this zetetician sphere (20 people on the networks) which will have helped it to bullshit and plunder even more the citizens. They will answer "yes, we helped them spread the good scientific word, but we were unaware of these wrongdoings".
Mr. Daoust will serve as a scapegoat and take the brunt of it, those who stupidly support him too.I'm not fooled.
