Hopefully this case will change the rules to avoid this kind of excesses.
vain hope! All the rules, (established precisely by those who hijack them) are made to be circumvented since men established them and that is not about to change!
Hopefully this case will change the rules to avoid this kind of excesses.
Christophe wrote:Isn't there an extra step in your sentence?
I like Raoult's watch in his last video, Hirsh, Levy and Buzyn probably have Rolexes or worse bling bling ... he has a 10 € swatch ...
It says a lot about the man!
Put on your watch, I'll tell you who you are! (don't look for the author I just invented it)
Christophe wrote:You can edit eh !!
Christophe wrote:Totof to the rescue !!
We understood that and the article is not as complacent as it seemsChristophe wrote:Didier Raoult does not question the treatment he recommends.https://www.facebook.com/lemonde.fr/posts/10159683795102590
Failing to retract, the team of Marseille researchers is exposed to the same criticisms as in March: "Given the method and the many biases, we could not already conclude anything", grumbles Thibault Fiolet, citing inappropriate statistical modeling, PCR tests changing depending on the day, incomplete data or the disappearance during the study of a dead patient and a patient transferred to intensive care, both in the hydroxychloroquine group.
Worse: the few additional data published in this correspondence make it less conclusive, adds Thibault Fiolet, the viral difference between the two groups fading over time.
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 354 guests