Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

[izentrop]

Mr. Girouette is Raoult, I assumed that Adrien only repeated one of his sentences (highlighted in bold), adding a personal touch.

Normally the land is tested before it is put on the market. Adverse trials are known.

this is only partially true, otherwise there would be no pharmacovigilance body intended to list the side effects not perceived during the 4 phases before marketing authorization. So Adrien is right on the facts!

It was also Raoult that I was aiming for.
Adrien is pushing for the doctor's right to prescribe anything by following his intuition alone.

[Obamot]

This is very different, have you seen his CV compared to yours? Not once have I seen him express things that weren't measured.

He, based on your criteria, can say whatever he wants, because based on this: http://www.infectiopolesud.com/IMG/pdf/ ... le_Sud.pdf
You no.

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Mr. Girouette is Raoult, I assumed that Adrien only repeated one of his sentences (highlighted in bold), adding a personal touch.

health-pollution-prevention / resignation-of-dr-raoult-supporter-of-chloroquine-from-scientific-advice-covid19-t16370-5700.html

National College of Medical Pharmacology
Let's be clear, the evaluation of the effectiveness of a drug is mainly based on randomized trials ...

[Obamot]

Yes, it did not even come from you, it pointed to Pédro's post which pointed out the opinion of the IHU ...

It is perhaps the moment to dispel the misunderstanding raised by Izentrop which pointed out the demo of the painting.

Can you deliver a single link on anyone who said they were "salary.”Randomized trials?

No need to look far:

71427FAE-25FF-429F-A2C6-4CD472AD45F3.jpeg (193.2 Kio) Consulté 1105 fois

This did not mean, in any way, to say that Professor Raoult would himself be “for” VS “against” such and such a method, nor all the time (it was a question of bringing to reflection). It has absolutely nothing to do ... Moreover, he says immediately further on, how randomized studies are useful (especially placebo / nocebo, etc.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TI3Re57X2Y&feature=youtu.be&t=844

Do you agree with that Izentrop?

And the link on what he talks about next, concerns the book
- “Against randomized effects”

Except that it is signed by Jean-Christophe Lagier.

Do you recognize that you made a “somewhat hasty” conclusion Izentrop?

[Janic]

Adrien is pushing for the doctor's right to prescribe anything by following his intuition alone.

A doctor is entitled to prescribe what he considers appropriate for his patient, including if this product is not listed for a pathology other than that indicated in its Marketing Authorization. It is under his responsibility and that of his patient, who must be informed clearly according to the law.
If intuition was not used, in many professions including research, the results in many areas would be miserable.

[izentrop]

Ok it's not a sentence from Raoult, must say that he annoys me and I do not listen to him and since he rejects randomized studies, he could not have pronounced this sentence.

However, you continue to give voice to a character who vomits science by advocating a remedy proven ineffective, even dangerous.
He even goes so far as to quote fakes news so as not to come back to his mistakes.

[Obamot]

You are really stubborn, in the video you give as an example he does not reject them.

In the same paragraph you say that it is not a sentence of Raoult, to then say the opposite, “he rejects them”, Is that what you call“ the weather vane effect ”?

That it annoys you is one thing, the scientific approach is another. It doesn't matter what you assume he's saying. Placed in the pandemic context, we come back to the same point, should we send people home to die with Doliprane?

But thank you for admitting that this was not a sentence study by Raoult.

[Obamot]

* [But thank you for admitting that it was not a sentence from Raoult]

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Are there rebels in Switzerland?

I believed that hydroxychloroquine had been eradicated from Switzerland as a deadly poison since May ...

Hydroxychloroquine: doctors threatened with sanctions in Valais

[Janic]

I believed that hydroxychloroquine had been eradicated from Switzerland as a deadly poison since May ...

all the more bizarre since it has been used extensively in other diseases without being accused of being fatal! Wouldn't there be eel under the rock? (the famous conspiracy theory)