JOURNALIST: But basically what is the difference between good and bad statisticians?
ABC: Ah I was waiting for this one! I was waiting ...
No, but the bad statistician? Well, it's the guy who has a computer, sees a list, numbers, calculates ...
JOURNALIST: And the good statistician?
ABC: The good statistician? He's a guy, he has a computer, a computer, sees a list, numbers, calculates ... but ... it's not the same thing: there's the right statistician, and there's the bad statistician ... There's the fake, and there's the non-fake. You have to explain it there: You see: there's the wrong statistician: You see a list, numbers: calculates, calculates. The good statistician: sees a list, figures: calculates there ... but he's a good statistician !!! You see? That's it ! We can't confuse them .... There's the wrong statistician: they see a list, numbers, calculates, that's for sure ... So there we recognize it around! But the good statistician: sees a list, numbers, calculates, but ... what a good statistician! Well, anyway, these are stupid questions ...
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)