and you would have known by listening to this one in the text and context!I didn't disparage anything at all, I just asked if she had taken her data anywhere other than Pfizer's reports, and I had no evidence to say otherwise.which confirms that not having seen the subject in full, a little bit cannot give you the background of thought and the progress of the author's analysis, so your only goal is to denigrate on principle.
What is stupid is to prejudge when you do not want to be really informed and there you do not stop, you even have an excessively long time to do it. So to really know what it is, you watch or you simply lose interest in it. and it's not KantAnd I find the reaction to say that I only have to watch a 52 minute video to find out he's completely stupid.
Me, I saw or read, almost all the writings and videos of your usual sects in order to note the different points of divergence. It is indeed long, but essential and maybe even you have not seen and read them all And I did not cry so that one does it in my places and places. So assume yourself, for once!