Medical liability of doctors who would be involved in anti-Covid vaccination

[ABC2019]

Data from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was posted on the FDA website here: https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
50 pages of data and tables.

Indeed, thanks for the link, there is no significant difference in efficiency by age group.

Capturing 2020-12 09-screen 22.26.19.png (232.45 KB) Viewed times 2212

[Obamot]

Data from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was posted on the FDA website here: https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
50 pages of data and tables.

Thank you, but it's not a peer-reviewed study ... I'm not wasting my time with that ...

Then when I read this on the 1st page ...

Sponsor: Pfizer and BioNTech

Well at least it's fair to say it!

Yes, and then the contradiction is in no way proven. Geneticist Alexandra henrion-Caude went to redo all the calculations - she said that she dug the details - of this sponsored study. She therefore reworked the Pfizer data to arrive at the figures she describes. Only top experts are able to do this finely enough.

And so it is not the figures that appear spontaneously in the tables! Rubbish. Don't take us for idiots.
Indeed, no figures given by the opponents (illustrious unknowns) do not correspond to her figures: none.

We cannot therefore deduce that it would have been mistaken, the opponents taking up again what Pfizer said gives it all. Mainstream nods who discovered the earth was flat because they were whispered in their ears with steaks

[ABC2019]

Yes, and then the contradiction is in no way proven. Geneticist Alexandra henrion-Caude went to redo all the calculations - she said that she dug the details - of this sponsored study. She therefore reworked the Pfizer data to arrive at the figures she describes. Only top experts are able to do this finely enough.

And so it is not the figures that appear spontaneously in the tables! Rubbish. Don't take us for idiots.
Indeed, no figures given by the opponents (illustrious unknowns) do not correspond to her figures: none.

We cannot therefore deduce that it would have been mistaken, the opponents taking up again what Pfizer said gives it all. Mainstream nods who discovered the earth was flat because they were whispered in their ears with steaks

I do not understand what you are saying, she started from which figures, published where, to "redo the calculations", Alexandra henrion-Caude?

[Obamot]

I don't have to: ask that of those who dispute what she said, and / or ask that of the person concerned.

I don't know about you, but I prefer to place my trust in researchers who find like Alexandra Henrion-Caude, than in illustrious strangers like Pédro (who claims to align himself with the junk “expert” opinion on blogs (while he rejects the best indiscriminately, then comes to speak even if you poke his nose into his contradictions, and in that you have a family resemblance)

Same here: source 'doctors / researchers', same figures (more serious cases with vaccinated people, better information is urgently needed)

[ABC2019]

I don't have to: ask that of those who dispute what she said, and / or ask that of the person concerned.

well for me it is clear that it is part of the figures published by Pfizer, I do not see what it can use others - you have another idea you?

[Obamot]

Certainly ... Reread my penultimate post, the whole explanation is there.

Basically you are answering the question without having read, and you would like us to take you seriously?

[Janic]

Basically you are answering the question without having read, and you would like us to take you seriously?

apparently yes! He has science infused so he doesn't need to read anything.

[ABC2019]

Certainly ... Reread my penultimate post, the whole explanation is there.

if it's in the video, I don't have time to watch it, but is it said that she took her figures elsewhere than in the figures published by Pfizer, and if so, where?

[Janic]

if it's in the video, I don't have time to watch it, but is it said that she took her figures from elsewhere than from the figures published by Pfizer, and if so, where?

a video or any other means of expression, that makes a whole; not small extracts which no longer mean anything cut from the context. But it is obviously your specialty to take small pieces to make them subject to unnecessary controversies and empty of knowledge.

[ABC2019]

if it's in the video, I don't have time to watch it, but is it said that she took her figures elsewhere than in the figures published by Pfizer, and if so, where?

a video or any other means of expression, that makes a whole; not small extracts which no longer mean anything cut from the context. But it is obviously your specialty to take small pieces to make them subject to unnecessary controversies and empty of knowledge.

??
you did not understand anything what I said what, and suddenly you answer anything, as usual.

I just asked if she had taken her numbers from any reports published by Pfizer, that's all.