France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

[izentrop]

Beautiful skewer of antivaxx

[Janic]

all of a sudden you would have acquired and accumulated as much intellectual and scientific knowledge as this beautiful bunch of whistleblowers.

[Janic]

the flu vaccine scam in official figures

[Ahmed]

Although regularly requested, since I fit all the attribution criteria, I never consented to get vaccinated. I got the flu a few years ago, didn't die of it and am therefore immune for a bunch of years against every conceivable flu strain ...

[sen-no-sen]

The next global pandemic is unlikely to see a vaccine up to par.

WHO warns: we are officially on the way to a global pandemic

The information comes from Tedros Adhanom, Director General of the World Health Organization. According to Tedros, who spoke a few days ago at the World Summit of Governments in Dubai, the lack of universal health coverage is the biggest threat to global health. The researcher recalls at the same time that 3,5 billion people around the world still do not have access to essential health services.

In front of an audience suddenly uncomfortable, he said that "this is exactly what happened 100 years ago during the Spanish flu epidemic", not to mention that humanity was not not immune to a new disaster of this kind. "A devastating epidemic could begin in any country and kill millions of people because we are not yet prepared."

But because of the high cost of care, nearly 100 million people worldwide find themselves in extreme poverty. Result? People cannot afford to go to the hospital, make a doctor's appointment or pay for treatment, and are not being treated for their symptoms. If their condition worsens, they die without being diagnosed. And so, "the first signs of an epidemic are missed".

Surveillance is one of the most vital forms of protection that public health organizations in the world can offer, but they depend on the money of the governments they serve. However, governments are reducing the budgets for these programs, without it being known whether these projects will one day be renewed. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently announced that they will cut their epidemic prevention projects by 80%. According to the Washington Post, programs to prevent infectious diseases, such as the Ebola virus, are being cut in 39 of the 49 countries where they have been used.

https://sciencepost.fr/2018/02/loms-avertit-sommes-officiellement-voie-dune-pandemie-mondiale/

Deforestation could very well be the cause of a pandemic due to the dislodgement of certain species such as the bat fruit bat carrying certain very unfriendly viruses such as Ebola , Marburg,the SARS or Nipah...

[Janic]

https://sciencepost.fr/2018/02/loms-ave ... -mondiale/

Deforestation could very well be the cause of a pandemic due to the dislodgement of certain species such as the flying bat bat of certain very unfriendly viruses such as Ebola, Marburg, SARS or Nipah ...

Another of these anxiety-provoking speeches intended to claim credits as usual and, without saying so, new vaccines, of course. From the oldest of the carrot / stick systems.
More interesting this subject from the same site: https://sciencepost.fr/2016/11/seul-vir ... lhumanite/

Regardless of the subject but on the same site:
https://sciencepost.fr/2018/08/que-se-p ... egetalien/
Again and again a speech of incompetence.

Regarding the Spanish flu;
February 2015
The lies about the Spanish flu die hard ... and have serious consequences!
Carefree and irresponsible allopathic medicine Allopathic medicine is clearly struggling to question itself: after having unnecessarily scared people during the bogus H1N1 pandemic by raising the specter of a resemblance of the swine virus with the Spanish influenza virus , now the increasingly announced pandemics are being prepared, ever more actively. A certain percentage of citizens (asleep with gas) continue to believe that the medical and scientific establishment ensures their best security by studying the most effective means of managing the risks of infection ...

Yet, it turns out in reality that the Spanish influenza virus was not the per se / alone hypervirulent virus that was portrayed but that its most dire consequences were due to the grossly inadequate treatment that was then recommended by conventional medicine, namely high-dose aspirin (considered harmless painkiller). This treatment with aspirin actually promoted secondary bacterial pneumonia which is the real cause of death. Dr Taylor of Philadelphia said at the time: "Some can resist aspirin, others can resist the flu, but no one can resist both." The excellent Nexus article which discusses the facts related to the Spanish flu continues: “From 1950 to 1980, thousands of deaths of children suffering from the flu and another condition, Reye's syndrome, remained unexplained until that acetylsalicylic acid (= aspirin) has been identified as the main factor ".

1918 Spanish flu in Montreal

In comparison, homeopaths who treated patients with influenza at the time and who did not use aspirin but remedies like GELSEMIUM or BRYONIA, obtained death rates 10 to 30 times lower (see pp 14 to 18 in the previous link + also here), which clearly shows the flagrant error of official medicine which unfortunately remains the only one to impose its so-called "solutions" (= VACCINES +++ and antivirals) in the part of the preparation for the next long-awaited pandemics. It is obviously necessary to be blind enough in view of what is recalled above not to be worried about this ideological and practical monopoly that authoritarian allopathic medicine exercises on the choice of these so-called solutions which risk being imposed at any time. by force in the name, of course, of the so-called "greatest good of all"!

Failure to learn from old mistakes is serious, stubbornness in blindness and ideology is serious and literally threatens the health of billions of people on this earth. So-called experts who keep recommending the design, distribution and purchase of new vaccines and antivirals must be viewed for what they are and with the utmost caution: as people eminently linked to the world of pharmacy and whose narrowness of view as to the possible range of the best solutions is linked to the socio-educational context in which they have evolved. Let’s not forget that allopathic medicine and its effects is the THIRD cause of death in a country like the United States, just behind cardiovascular disease and cancer, with more than 225 annual deaths! If we make a small "table" of the collateral damage of official medicine in the USA (based on data from an official study published in The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) under the following reference: Starfield, B. (2000, July 26). Is US health really the best in the world? Journal of the American Medical Association, 284 (4), 483-485.), We arrive at the following figures:

- 12 deaths due to unnecessary surgical operations

- 7000 deaths due to medical errors in hospitals

- 20 deaths from other errors in hospitals

- 80 deaths from infections in hospitals

- 106 deaths due to side effects of prescribed drugs

[sen-no-sen]

Another of these anxiety-provoking speeches intended to claim credits as usual and, without saying so, new vaccines, of course. From the oldest of the carrot / stick systems.

Anxious speech?
The Ebola epidemic has killed more than 11000 people in Africa in the past 2 years, but I imagine that it is not very serious, it is just to scare ...

Massive deforestation, the transmission of viruses to living species in concentration areas, the globalization of trade, seems to me to be fertile ground for the next pandemic.
We have to get out of the conspiratorial discourse which would like all epidemics to be nothing but the invention of the laboratory to make money!
The reality is that when the time comes there will be no vaccine available, on the one hand because of the extreme poverty of the exposed population, on the other because of the novelty of current modes of propagation.

[sen-no-sen]

More interesting this subject from the same site: https://sciencepost.fr/2016/11/seul-vir ... lhumanite/

The question is wrong, the right question is:Could a genetically modified virus destroy most of the human population (80/90%).
With genetic engineering and other synthetic biology I do not see how one could answer this question negatively ...

[Janic]

The question is badly posed, the good question is this: Could a genetically modified virus destroy most of the human population (80/90%).

The author is like us, nobody knows anything about it! However genetically modified viruses are already used for certain pathologies and have not caused epidemics, on the other hand a modified virus can recombine with others and lead to (theoretical) catastrophe. Indeed, viral contaminations cease as soon as adequate hygienic precautions are used as for smallpox.

With genetic engineering and other synthetic biology I do not see how one could answer this question in the negative.

Indeed, that is the big question!
what is certain is that in this case, no phony vaccine could prevent or stop it.

[Ahmed]

In the event of a global epidemic, which is favored by the size of our population and massive exchanges, there would be no need to talk about a "bogus" vaccine, since it would not have time to be developed. I doubt, however, the annihilation of the whole of humanity, due to genetic variability.
Even more serious seems to me the great memetic uniformity that puts us at the mercy of the slightest beginning * of collapse: once the spark produced, nothing could stop it.

* This must be understood in chronological terms, since it goes without saying that the spark cannot be the cause of collapse.