https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbpxjJLiHvw
aluminum Gherardi
To listen with the greatest attention. Gherardi, and his team, demonstrate that the only experiment which serves as a reference was incomplete, based on excessive doses of safety (which Sansonetti recommends) and on a far too short duration, were summary. It demonstrates figures and graphs to support its insufficiency and therefore the basic errors of this one experiment, such as the solubilization of the aluminum and its fixing at the place of injection. Everything was biased, as Professor Even points out for a number of clinical trials!
More recent data therefore demonstrate the toxicity of aluminum in vaccines mainly because it is injected into the blood as are deodorants which penetrate through micro lesions due to shaving.
Poisoning aluminum
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13692
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1515
- Contact :
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
As if the dose of the vaccines was not negligible compared to all that circulates in the blood. https://www.consoglobe.com/aluminium-va ... etition-cgJanic wrote:More recent data therefore demonstrate the toxicity of aluminum in vaccines mainly because it is injected into the blood as are deodorants which penetrate through micro lesions due to shaving.
Guerardi is not taken seriously by the WHO nor by the HCSP
0 x
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
Janic wrote:
More recent data therefore demonstrate the toxicity of aluminum in vaccines mainly because it is injected into the blood as are deodorants which penetrate through micro lesions due to shaving.
As if the dose of the vaccines was not negligible compared to all that circulates in the blood.
https://www.consoglobe.com/aluminium-va ... etition-cg
This is the whole problem of amateurs like Marina, who will only seek her information from conformist places, which can only give direction to the current. Where are the contradictory consultations? Nowhere!
It's obvious! It reveals things that HCSP does not want to examine. The composition of its committee is worth its weight in gold.Guerardi is not taken seriously by the WHO nor by the HCSP Aluminum and vaccines
Report (1612 kb)
Document date: 11/07/2013
Date of online publication: 29/07/2013
Other documents relating to
Adjuvanted Vaccination
Share
4453
For more than ten years, France has been the subject of debates relating to the safety of aluminum used as an adjuvant in most vaccines in all countries of the world and this for more than sixty years.
The High Council for Public Health, at the request of the Directorate General for Health, carried out a critical review of the literature on aluminum in vaccines and a benefit / risk analysis of aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines.
In addition, this report also includes updated pharmacovigilance data, the mechanisms of action of adjuvants, alternatives to adjuvants based on aluminum salts, as well as toxicological data on aluminum.
The HCSP believes that the scientific data available to date does not allow to question the safety of aluminum-containing vaccines, in terms of their benefit / risk balance. It recommends the continuation of vaccinations in accordance with the current vaccination calendar and warns of the consequences, in terms of the recurrence of infectious diseases, that could have a drop in immunization coverage resulting from a questioning of vaccines containing aluminum in the absence of scientific justification.
In addition, the HCSP encourages further research aimed at assessing the safety of available and developing adjuvants.
http://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/groupe?clef=44
Nothing but provaccines! Where are the dissidents?
Franck Chauvin, its director, and oncologist, is therefore in opposition to Joyeux, who is just as competent, but absent (or other dissidents), as if by chance, because the grains of sand stop the machine if not!
If you had had the courage to watch Gherardi's video, you could have noticed that the old studies reported were questioned concerning the doses and therefore the toxicology studies.
Moreover, but that has been forgotten (memory gap) Rosine Bachelot had been vaccinated with a vaccine WITHOUT ADJUVANTS in the midst of a crisis and therefore where boosting the immune defenses would have been fully justified: then, fear of adjuvants since was she a pharmacist? Or awareness of their uselessness? Did she question " resulting from questioning of aluminum-containing vaccines in the absence of scientific justification. "without scientific justification?
Same thing, at that time, the question had been asked about its usefulness and the answer was that this adjuvant saved the amount of vaccine needed: just a question of big money as usual and economy of scale!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
Ghérardi's conference on aluminum follows the equally fundamental first part on calcium phosphate!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz5d1puLuY4
the end on the questions and answers concerns nanoparticles where, it seems, that the question remains unclear. However, nanoparticles, in industry, and therefore its distribution in populations are the subject of questions about its dangerousness for human health.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz5d1puLuY4
the end on the questions and answers concerns nanoparticles where, it seems, that the question remains unclear. However, nanoparticles, in industry, and therefore its distribution in populations are the subject of questions about its dangerousness for human health.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
more and more healthcare manufacturers are removing aluminum from their products due to proven toxicity, except in this area: why?
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
You should also think about removing your Teflon stoves: https://www.levif.be/actualite/sante/le ... 11569.html
With me it's already done: neither aluminum nor teflon. They all ended up in the garage!
I only have stainless steel (chrome nickel ... hum hum) and a good old cast iron pan (which rust at all washes! Intolerable for the housewife of 2019!)
According to an Italian study published in the American journal The Journal Of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, men exposed to the chemicals used to make Teflon have a shorter, thinner penis.
Teflon stoves are made with perfluorinated compounds (PFC) which have the ability to repel water, fat and dust. They are also present in certain food packaging, waterproof clothing or cosmetic products. Known to be non-stick agents, perfluorinated compounds are also used as stains on textiles and carpets.
Toxic substances
These substances seem rather practical, but they are recognized as endocrine disruptors. Generally absorbed via water, food contaminated or inhaled by vapors released by stoves during cooking, these compounds can be harmful to fertility and to the male sexual organs. In fact, these endocrine disruptors would bind to testosterone receptors, which would block their activation. In humans, testosterone is the main sex hormone and plays an essential role in reproduction.
Carried out as part of a screening protocol in secondary schools, the Italian study aimed to study the relationship between exposure to PFCs and men's reproductive health. The researchers compared the size of the penis, the volume of the testicles and the quality of the sperm of 383 Italians between 16 and 22 years old: 212 of them living in regions highly exposed to PFC and 171 living in regions not exposed.
A penis 12,5% shorter and 6,3% thinner than the others
The results showed that men in contaminated regions have an average penis 12,5% shorter and 6,3% thinner than the others. They also highlight the lower volume of the testes, the less healthy sperm and the shorter anogenital distance. If the anogenital distance (distance between the scrotum and the anus) is shorter, this indicates a less good development of the reproductive system.
PFCs are present in many everyday products and survive very long in the environment. They are harmful to the male reproductive system, but they are also linked to high cholesterol, bladder cancer and prostate cancer.
PFOA (one of the most common PFCs) has been banned in France since 2015 and should be banned across Europe from July 2020.
With me it's already done: neither aluminum nor teflon. They all ended up in the garage!
I only have stainless steel (chrome nickel ... hum hum) and a good old cast iron pan (which rust at all washes! Intolerable for the housewife of 2019!)
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
just oil the pan after washing. For stainless steel, the solution remains to stop cookingI only have stainless steel (chrome nickel ... hum hum) and a good old cast iron pan (which rust at all washes! Intolerable for the housewife of 2019!)
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
- GuyGadebois
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6532
- Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
- Location: 04
- x 982
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
Janic wrote:just oil the pan after washing. For stainless steel, the solution remains to stop cookingI only have stainless steel (chrome nickel ... hum hum) and a good old cast iron pan (which rust at all washes! Intolerable for the housewife of 2019!)
A cast iron pan cannot be washed. She puts on her panties, rinses off with water with a sponge (soft scraping) to remove the particles of food that remain there, dries and oils lightly.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13692
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1515
- Contact :
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
Bringing out an old study by diverting its message to make it a food scare, one that makes business work, two "it's the dose that makes the poison" is still relevant today.Christophe wrote:With me it's already done: neither aluminum nor teflon. They all ended up in the garage!
It is still farfetched as a conclusion from rather vague statistics.A river highly contaminated by runoff from a chemical plant and a water treatment plant seems to be the source of this record level of exposure. They compared these parameters with those of 171 men living in other regions in Italy. https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/a ... nis-74520/
The important thing is to know the risks to avoid the danger, eradicating can lead to greater danger.
The PTFE non-stick coating begins to release PFCs only above 260 ° https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%A9fl ... r_l'humain, forgetting a pan on the fire can be dangerous, apart from that, it's a shame to deprive yourself of the practical side.
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Poisoning with aluminum
izentrop wrote:Bringing out an old study by diverting its message to make it a food scare, one that makes business work, two "it's the dose that makes the poison" is still relevant today.Christophe wrote:With me it's already done: neither aluminum nor teflon. They all ended up in the garage!
The article is recent by cons I did not find the study in question (the link redirects to the home page) ... so I do not know when it dates!
I only transmitted the info ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 36 Replies
- 5888 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
20/11/22, 22:55A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 5 Replies
- 2224 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
30/09/22, 06:41A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 10 Replies
- 2416 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
04/08/22, 17:16A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 61 Replies
- 9430 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
10/06/22, 13:30A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 1 Replies
- 1476 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
02/02/22, 20:42A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 254 guests