Ivermectin Reviews? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by ABC2019 » 23/01/21, 22:25

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:It's good, hang on to the brush, I'm removing the ladder. I still remember it when you said that in any case the vast majority of infected people recovered spontaneously, with or without Doliprane and that therefore, the Raoult protocol was good for the trash. So apply these precepts to vaccines .... Do you want me to find your posts or do you trust me? : Mrgreen:

It remains true, at least 99% of people do not die from covid, but 1% of France still makes 670 people ... do you have a little trouble with the numbers?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14963
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4363

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 23/01/21, 23:40

ABC2019 wrote:It remains true, at least 99% of people do not die from covid, but 1% of France still makes 670 people ... do you have a little trouble with the numbers?

If I have a little trouble with the numbers, you obviously have "a little" trouble with the reality (remind me of the numbers, please? The real ones, eh ...) ... 670? Yesterday it was 000 and a few miles (500) ... and tomorrow? Sorry, I forgot your keyword: "POTENTIALLY". What a fool I do ... : Mrgreen:
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by ABC2019 » 24/01/21, 07:45

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:It remains true, at least 99% of people do not die from covid, but 1% of France still makes 670 people ... do you have a little trouble with the numbers?

If I have a little trouble with the numbers, you obviously have "a little" trouble with the reality (remind me of the numbers, please? The real ones, eh ...) ... 670? Yesterday it was 000 and a few miles (500) ... and tomorrow? Sorry, I forgot your keyword: "POTENTIALLY". What a fool I do ... : Mrgreen:

because here I took 1% of the total population, when in reality collective immunity should still prevent the epidemic from spreading above a certain threshold, which was estimated at 60% but which could increase to 80% with the new variants. On the other hand, the lethality is not exactly 1%, there are uncertainties on the real number of asymptomatics, and it can vary according to the treatments and the appearance of new variants. In short, no one can predict the final figure within 10 of course, but all the estimates converge in a range between 000 and 200 (and if you find that imprecise, console yourself by telling yourself that it is no worse than 'uncertainty about the future global warming, which we are told is very good science that has made a lot of progress thanks to information technology : Mrgreen: )
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14963
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4363

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 24/01/21, 12:10

1% of 67 gives 000, yes well done! For there to be 000 deaths, therefore, 670% of the population would have to be infected if and only if the case fatality rate was one percent. Yeah! Remind me how many cases have been identified in France? And remind me of the percentage of deaths? You are hovering at 000 my dear Dudu! : Mrgreen:

Ah, they slip me into the headset that on January 21, 2021, the death rate from Covid-19 (the number of deaths reported to the general population) is around 0.1%. Say, wouldn't that be about 10 times less than 1%? "No ?" ©
1 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by ABC2019 » 24/01/21, 12:57

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:1% of 67 gives 000, yes well done! For there to be 000 deaths, therefore, 670% of the population would have to be infected if and only if the case fatality rate was one percent. Yeah! Remind me how many cases have been identified in France? And remind me of the percentage of deaths? You are hovering at 000 my dear Dudu! : Mrgreen:

absolutely, and therefore logically I never said that there would be between 670 deaths. This is to be weighted by the infected fraction and the true case fatality rate which may be less than 000%. This is why I did not give the figure of 1 dead, but a range between 670 and 000 if we do nothing. Obviously if the vaccination is effective we can hope for much less. I think that even with the vaccination we will still be around 200.

Much more than scooters and the seasonal flu, but that's already been the case.
Ah, they slip me into the headset that on January 21, 2021, the death rate from Covid-19 (the number of deaths reported to the general population) is around 0.1%. Say, wouldn't that be about 10 times less than 1%? "No ?" ©


yes and you may not have heard in the other earpiece that it was also estimated that there were only 10 to 12% of the affected population? do you need help making your rules of three? don't hesitate to ask if you need : Mrgreen:
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14963
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4363

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 24/01/21, 13:01

Yes, yes, I know all that, and I especially know that you have written absolutely anything on the subject since yesterday. Everything is bogus. And also your last pathetic intervention where you try (in vain) to fall back on your feet. CQFD. : Mrgreen:
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by ABC2019 » 24/01/21, 13:13

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Yes, yes, I know all that, and I especially know that you have written absolutely anything on the subject since yesterday. Everything is bogus. And also your last pathetic intervention where you try (in vain) to fall back on your feet. CQFD. : Mrgreen:


frankly I do not see how we can go wrong by making a rule of three out of 70 victims for 000 to 10% of the affected population ...

Give us your calculation then, assuming you know how to make one, and that you don't just insult everyone when you see that you have nothing sane to answer.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
reinoso
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 912
Registration: 12/12/12, 12:57
Location: Sologne
x 1136

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by reinoso » 25/01/21, 07:33

and more trials in sight!
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14963
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4363

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 25/01/21, 11:39

ABC2019 wrote:
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Yes, yes, I know all that, and I especially know that you have written absolutely anything on the subject since yesterday. Everything is bogus. And also your last pathetic intervention where you try (in vain) to fall back on your feet. CQFD. : Mrgreen:


frankly I do not see how we can go wrong by making a rule of three out of 70 victims for 000 to 10% of the affected population ...

Give us your calculation then, assuming you know how to make one, and that you don't just insult everyone when you see that you have nothing sane to answer.

My calculation? There is no calculation to do. Everyone is able to understand that you unlock to death. 100% of the affected population (IMPOSSIBLE) = 700 deaths (ladle). 000 to 10%: 12 dead (roughly). The reality is quite different, for days you have been saying anything. Point bar.
The AVC method for dummies:
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Ivermectin: drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by ABC2019 » 25/01/21, 12:48

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:My calculation? There is no calculation to do. Everyone is able to understand that you unlock to death. 100% of the affected population (IMPOSSIBLE) = 700 deaths (ladle). 000 to 10%: 12 dead (roughly). The reality is quite different, for days you have been saying anything. Point bar.

I nowhere wrote that there would be 100% of the affected population, I said between 60 and 80% depending on the contagiousness of the viral strain. Will it be okay to do rule 3 or do you want help?

And if you have another number to suggest to know what level of immunization it would take to stop the epidemic, give it to us, instead of constantly dodging the question behind your insults.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Bing [Bot] and 314 guests