Ivermectin Reviews? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?

[ABC2019]

See as well : https://factuel.afp.com/lefficacite-de- ... -demontree

but obviously the opinions of the health authorities do not have the same value as the youtube videos ....

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

See as well : https://factuel.afp.com/lefficacite-de- ... -demontree

but obviously the opinions of the health authorities do not have the same value as the youtube videos ....

It's not a "Youtube video", it's a video from IHU Marseille posted on Youtube. Do you see the difference ? On the other hand, your dung is "laid" by an AFP journalist, you still do not see the difference?

[Christophe]

See as well : https://factuel.afp.com/lefficacite-de- ... -demontree

but obviously the opinions of the health authorities do not have the same value as the youtube videos ....

This ass just hasn't read enough forum...

That concluded https://factuel.afp.com/ on the effectiveness of vaccines on serious cases and over 75s (80% of deaths) ... It is scientifically demonstrated ???

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

See as well : https://factuel.afp.com/lefficacite-de- ... -demontree

but obviously the opinions of the health authorities do not have the same value as the youtube videos ....

This ass just hasn't read enough forum...

No, but for AVC, AFP represents "a health authority" and a journalist, a scientific expert ...
For Izy also, who hastened to "like" ... It pains me more and more, the old man.

[ABC2019]

See as well : https://factuel.afp.com/lefficacite-de- ... -demontree

but obviously the opinions of the health authorities do not have the same value as the youtube videos ....

This ass just hasn't read enough forum...

That concluded https://factuel.afp.com/ on the effectiveness of vaccines on serious cases and over 75s (80% of deaths) ... It is scientifically demonstrated ???

It seems too early to have reliable results on a large scale, but I think we will have some in a few weeks!

[Christophe]

It seems too early to have reliable results on a large scale, but I think we will have some in a few weeks!

My God....



So you admit there, THAT WE GIVE MASSIVELY WITHOUT RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC PROOF of results ???



And why tolerate this method for vaccines and not ivermectin or HCQ or any other inexpensive method?

[ABC2019]

It seems too early to have reliable results on a large scale, but I think we will have some in a few weeks!

My God....



So you admit there, THAT WE GIVE MASSIVELY WITHOUT RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC PROOF of results ???



And why tolerate this method for vaccines and not ivermectin or HCQ or any other inexpensive method?

because the vaccines have been shown to be very effective in a younger population, and therefore even if the population tested was quite small in number and had few statistics, it is still logical to think that it will also have a significant effect on older.

There is an ethical reason not to over-test on the elderly, it's the double-blind problem, it's that you have to agree to let a population receive placebo and become infected. It is therefore better to do it on a relatively fragile population and extrapolate to an elderly population than to let the elderly population take risks.

This is what we should also do for HCQ and Ivermectin, do a real double-blind test on a fairly large population, instead of accumulating small methodologically crappy studies here and there. .

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

because vaccines have shown great effectiveness in a younger population ...

Effective in a population little or not affected, the class!

[ABC2019]

because vaccines have shown great effectiveness in a younger population ...

Effective in a population little or not affected, the class!

but we measure the fact that people don't get sick, not the fact that they don't die. Young people are just as affected by the infection as old people, it's just less serious.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

because vaccines have shown great effectiveness in a younger population ...

Effective in a population little or not affected, the class!

but we measure the fact that people don't get sick, not the fact that they don't die. Young people are just as affected by the infection as old people, it's just less serious.

It's good, hang on to the brush, I'm removing the ladder. I still remember it when you said that in any case the vast majority of infected people recovered spontaneously, with or without Doliprane and that therefore, the Raoult protocol was good for the trash. So apply these precepts to vaccines .... Do you want me to find your posts or do you trust me?