Ivermectin Reviews? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?

[Remundo]

randomized, let's be serious

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

randomized, let's be serious

A triple-blind clairvoyance gift ok, but in addition randomized? With that we should not see much, even if and when we see!

[izentrop]

izentrop wrote: dont act.

Of which nothing at all. If indeed documents are made to be read, they are above all made to be understood (and validated).

Absolutely, that's why the Egyptian study of small cohort is in the Swiss document, the Argentina study too and that does not prevent them from concluding with:

IVM is not yet approved for the treatment of any viral infections, including SARSCoV-2 infection.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

izentrop wrote: dont act.

Of which nothing at all. If indeed documents are made to be read, they are above all made to be understood (and validated).

Absolutely, that's why the Egyptian study of small cohort is in the Swiss document, the Argentina study too and that does not prevent them from concluding with:

IVM is not yet approved for the treatment of any viral infections, including SARSCoV-2 infection.

It may not be approved, but it is proven to be effective by those who have used it.
Shake me, shake me, otherwise the pulp, it stays at the bottom ....

IzyShake.gif (971.24 KiB) Viewed 1293 times

[izentrop]

It may not be approved, but it is proven to be effective by those who have used it.

Apart from repeated personal attacks, you gave only one match betting article which did not even give the source of his "bluffing" claim.

[GuyGadebois]

It may not be approved, but it is proven to be effective by those who have used it.

Apart from repeated personal attacks, you gave only one match betting article which did not even give the source of his "bluffing" claim.

What attacks, Rambo, sorry Conan ...?
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 20191619v1

[Christophe]

Please don't use your 2 Guy accounts !!

I blocked the old one ...

[Christophe]

Video calling Boris Johnson to use Ivermectin has been censored

Then reposted, waiting to be probably censored again

Since: electricity-electronic-informatique / censorship-covid-de-facebook-youtube-ras-le-bol-t16530-70.html # p426853

[izentrop]

It may not be approved, but it is proven to be effective by those who have used it.

Apart from repeated personal attacks, you gave only one match betting article which did not even give the source of his "bluffing" claim.

What attacks, Rambo, sorry Conan ...?
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 20191619v1

Not worth a nail:

This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed

... Where are the 1200 patients of the bluffing study?

A total of 167 patients were included. All of them had confirmed COVID19 infection by the
rtPCR method. Average age was 55.7 years, 48.5% were female and 51.5% were male. Tea
stages of disease of all included patients when they joined the study were:

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Not worth a nail

Thank you to the great world specialist in the pandemic for this edifying light.

http://www.pharmabaires.com/1739-result ... salud.html
https://www.cadenanueve.com/wp-content/ ... ltados.pdf
https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.co ... earch.html