Ivermectin Reviews? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?

[pedrodelavega]

No guesswork, all scientists know that Remdesivir already did not work for Ebola.

Not proof that it can't work for anything else. Had to try. Many believed HCQ as well.

The two "researchers" also knew it

--> conjecture, sorry (You're probably talking about Lacombe and I don't know who)

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

No, I've been making enormous efforts since a while ago, on this subject, so as not to piss you off. And I'm getting there. CQFD.

PS: Difference between HCQ and Remdesivir, if one has proven itself for decades in its specific field, without danger, the other never, anywhere, on anything except to demonstrate its harmfulness (Without mentioning its price).

[pedrodelavega]

No, I've been making enormous efforts since a while ago, on this subject, so as not to piss you off. And I'm getting there. CQFD.

Huge efforts? Curious

[pedrodelavega]

PS: Difference between HCQ and Remdesivir, one has been proven for decades in its specific field, safe, while Remdesivir never, anywhere, on anything other than to do proof of its harmfulness (without mentioning its price).

And you think possible that all these researchers (that you quoted above), much more qualified than us, will shut their mouths in the face of such "evidence" Vs a threat to them and their loved ones just because of the "pressure" of their boss. Does that sound like reasoning to you?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

PS: Difference between HCQ and Remdesivir, one has been proven for decades in its specific field, safe, while Remdesivir never, anywhere, on anything other than to do proof of its harmfulness (without mentioning its price).

And you think it's possible that all these researchers, much more qualified than us, will shut their mouths in the face of a threat to them and their loved ones just because of the "pressure" of their boss. Does that sound like reasoning to you?

Confirmed, you don't care about the world, deny corruption, lies, conflicts of interest, power struggles between CHU and IHU as you have always done. If you believe that Lacombe and Costagliola (And the filthy Yazdanpanah of INSERM too, and of the scientific council deserted by Raoult, well...) would use Remdesivir on their loved ones, you are dreaming my guy!!! What is the chance of catching Ebola in France?

PS: Curious? Given the bad faith you show on a subject that has already been covered, there is nothing curious.

[pedrodelavega]

Given the bad faith you show on a subject that has already been covered, there is nothing curious.

people who disagree with you are not necessarily in bad faith...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Given the bad faith you show on a subject that has already been covered, there is nothing curious.

people who disagree with you are not necessarily in bad faith...

Faith. Two years of denial, two years of it. And an time Plus you're avoiding the heart of the matter.

[pedrodelavega]

. And an time Plus you're avoiding the heart of the matter.

... it was you who avoided: sante-pollution-prevention/ivermectin-medicament-efficace-a-99-8-en-48h-contre-le-covid-19-t16402-1410.html#p512178
No answer.
Nb: I see a difference between "denying corruption" and questioning the level of corruption relayed by social networks

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

1: I answered you
2: I will not look for answers on social networks
3: CQFD, you are in bad faith

[pedrodelavega]

1: I answered you
2: I will not look for answers on social networks
3: CQFD, you are in bad faith

1: beside. (Do you think the reasoning given holds up?)
2: I'm not talking about you. But from me.