janic wrote: But the "conspiracy" evoked here are not dangers for our society, but only for financial or caste interests. It is therefore a question of difference of opinion otherwise one falls back into the inquisition with its results.
A conspirator remains a conspirator.
One can very well defend Homeopathy (like Dr. Gardenal) without turning into conspiracy delirium.
There are unfortunately groups defending an idealized vision of alternative medicine and ready to use hoax to develop their activities.
Such groups act by imitations and in response to what he calls "Big Pharma" ... but a reaction product remains a substitute and does not allow problems to be overcome, on the contrary it stirs them up.
Indeed, in the face of certain excesses, many people prefer to turn to pharmaco-chemistry.
Let's go back point by point:
A conspirator remains a conspirator. But what is really a conspirator, everything is there. How is a protester different from any system of another protester who declares that this system is the object of a plot (as defined by the dictionary). Is it the denounced system that is conspiracy (who is hiding) or who denounces it?
One can very well defend Homeopathy (like Dr. Gardenal) without turning into conspiracy delirium.Homeopathy is not
one subjects that are subject to challenge.
Pr Joyeux is not a homeopath, but he contests, not the vaccinations, but the vaccination schedule too early, which is classified, cataloged as conspiracy against the system as antivaccinalist. IS IT COMPLOTIST?
Dr. Delepine and his wife, also retired oncologists, who no longer have to answer to the Vichy doctors' order, who also disputes the system in various ways, is also cataloged this way. DR Wakefield and Schmidt were the subject of this ostracism before being rehabilitated by the justice of 2 country and yet they continue to be the subject of this same plot conspiracy pseudo science and company. And everything to match!
There are unfortunately groups defending an idealized vision of alternative medicine and ready to use hoax to develop their activities.
What, according to this formulation, would mean that school medicine does not have an idealized vision of conventional medicine and therefore does not mystify its clientele? Be serious ! If she did her job properly (this medicine not the doctor who just applies what he learned at school) there would be no need to resort to other means, but she wants to keep its chemical monopoly by denigrating everything that does not conform to its protocols ... cans.
Since 5 decades I am close to these alternative medicines and I practice some so-called natural, so without chemicals, and I have never had to deal with gougnafiers. I have already mentioned many examples. So we must stop putting all the rotten eggs or not, in the same basket.
Now imagine (but it can happen to anyone without waiting for it) that you have cancer, for example,
in stage IVfinal stage, and this conventional medicine tells you that you have only a short time to live, a few months at most [*]. What are you doing ? You kindly wait for the lady with her big fake to harvest you or are you looking for a solution, any one to try to survive? I know in advance the answer of course!
Tell me that damn for damn, officially, anything is better than doing nothing, with the risk, minimal, of falling on a charlot making promises that he could not, maybe not, hold.
I say minimal why? Outside the official circuit, there is a parallel circuit that happens by word of mouth based on the results obtained (not these small ads on newspapers or not specialized) and to which our pseudo pseudo science do not have access (them can die quietly with the conscience that they did well to trust the system in place) hence this completely false speech which is the object of conspiracy to the orders of BP precisely:
Such groups act by imitations and in response to what he calls "Big Pharma" ... but a reaction product remains a substitute and does not allow problems to be overcome, on the contrary it stirs them up.
What do you know? You affirm this by personal experience (missed in this case) or by saying yes only, these famous smear campaigns that make the buzz and the joy of BP precisely (whether he orchestrates it or not).
It's a trap for the "critical" mind to believe without checking on the job! But at the same time this unguided reaction is understandable as long as a person is not in a position to verify its veracity or lies. 'I repeat again this reflection of Auguste Lumière and taken by many real scientists'
experience, unique source of truth »
Indeed, in the face of certain excesses, many people prefer to turn to pharmaco-chemistry.
Strangely, I have never seen a move in this direction, while it is usually the opposite that occurs. Except that we expect parallel medicines, and which precisely, to repair what BP broke with its toxic chemicals and unfortunately it is not always possible to repair the damage caused by others, all at its limits. But if this therapist in question crashes, then it is haro on the donkey, it is one of the newspapers scandal, rarely, if ever, the opposite and it is "
charlatan who let die such sick "(Without specifying that before he had been considered as fucked by the official doctors). But that's not, thankfully and obviously (sic), serious, nor deserves to be mentioned and so are fake news and denigration free of charge.
do not let yourself be carried away by these media issues. Check, check again, always check the origin of these fake news and then act in conscience.
[*] for example the case of David Servan Schreiber who granted himself a beautiful extension of life and which could have been much longer according to his own opinion.
sen-no-sen wrote:
Current knowledge does not allow to model the way in which homeopathy works,
On the other hand, current knowledge makes it possible to assess its "ineffectiveness".
like the fake news specialist who brings her back.
Its effectiveness is and has always been proven by the results
in the field, not hiding behind a computer to spread his lies.
All known knowledge today, shows that between the reality of the lived and this almost non-existent knowledge, there is a huge gap.
All living things did not wait for a scientific demonstration to breathe and therefore in total ignorance of its chemical composition, lung exchanges and all its complex mechanisms, otherwise we would all have died before having lived. In the same way we have always drunk and eaten without knowing what these different elements were made of, otherwise we would also have died before having lived. So lying down, at the niche, pseudo pseudo scientists
sen-no-sen wrote:
However the homeo is developing in so-called emerging countries like India or Brazil, which should ensure without much problem are expansion.
Because they can not afford to be treated by an effective medicine. We were in the same case before: cure grandmother, bleeding and bones of all kinds ... I pass and then
science has mingled with it and life expectancy has skyrocketed. If their standard of living rises enough, these emerging countries will also come there.
always so funny and ridiculous in his arguments. Science has and always had metro heaps behind reality, which is normal since its role is only to describe phenomena, not to invent them.
Life expectancy, it is actually skyrocketed as soon as child mortality has been curbed by hygiene (at least all doctors agree on this point) which makes up the statistics. But if we can not deny a certain effectiveness in chemical medicine (compared with the Middle Ages for example) it is negative by its toxicity (benefit / risk) and remove one breast, or both, the ovaries, the uterus, the prostate, the tonsils, and all the rest is very effective too, but traumatic for the operated, irradiated, chemically of all kinds. If this is effective medicine, we can not be surprised that it is more and more challenged and fear for its traumatic side effects
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré