The homeopathy explained metaphorically for Dummies

[Janic]

He was unlucky in fact

luck has nothing to do with science. We only harvest what we sow and his "eventful" life before could have cost him his life. its paradigm shift took place only before a fatal outcome.
but here we come out of the subject which is on the H.

[Janic]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip64_SeoYEs

There will be sports.
Listening to this first video that clarifies the positions of each, Sam is 3 on 1.000 in terms of belief in H and Brousselian 1 billion 1.000, it is a gap between each. B. positioning with respect to 30 years of professional exercise and Sam on ...? his belief only!
Argumentation versus argumentation is not likely to give much constructive, here as elsewhere.
But Sam, who is a sly little sly, wants to keep his hand and guide this exchange according to his criteria, (since on his website what is understandable) but does not propose the opposite, in line with this kind of exchange without debate that we find on the usual media.
As a result, everyone will continue to work on his certainties with B who will continue his medical practice and Sam his critics because it is his new business and he will continue to oppose abstract discourses against the reality of the field.

[izentrop]

You have to think that medicine is also a profession where you have to make a living and there are commercial habits to keep your customers. That's how I see it, more than a true belief. https://www.lequotidiendumedecin.fr/act ... hie_865522

[perseus]

Hello,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip64_SeoYEs

There will be sports.

I stopped to watch when Brousselian spoke of his absence of conflict of interest, frankly it is the level of Cahuzac swear not to have a foreign account ...

[Janic]

I stopped to watch when Brousselian spoke of his absence of conflict of interest, frankly it is the level of Cahuzac swear not to have a foreign account ...

already you have at least started, it is already that.
for you what is a conflict of interest?
For example, is a butcher in conflict of interest with the meat industry, with slaughterhouses, with breeders, with the FNSEA? Or does he practice his trade to support his family by exercising it independently of these channels?

by izentrop »06 / 02 / 19, 16: 21
this table is interesting, but does not correspond to the public saying that use (more than 40%) this homeopathy, often out of medical prescription since most A are either against or incompetent.

[perseus]

Hello,

I stopped to watch when Brousselian spoke of his absence of conflict of interest, frankly it is the level of Cahuzac swear not to have a foreign account ...

already you have at least started, it is already that.

I tried to push a little but ...

for you what is a conflict of interest?
For example, is a butcher in conflict of interest with the meat industry, with slaughterhouses, with breeders, with the FNSEA? Or does he practice his trade to support his family by exercising it independently of these channels?

You hold on butchers visibly.
The subject of the video is homeopathy, as a practitioner and also a defender of homeopathy, he can not say that he has no interests to defend here.
This does not mean that he can not express himself, I even imagine that he is a competent person in his field and that soliciting his opinion is normal. On the other hand, starting as he does in claiming to be conflict free is a lot of coffee. For me this greatly alters all credibility.

[sen-no-sen]

Regarding hypnosis meditation and sophrology it is difficult to say that his therapies would be effective or not in the sense that they require active work on the part of the subject.
Great meditators are capable of real prodigies (increase of body temperature, slow heart rate, increased concentration etc ...) but such a level is only possible with training.
Herbal medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, pharmaco-chemistry is part of the field of therapies that work effortlessly on the part of the patient.

[Janic]

You hold on butchers visibly.

No more than that ! I could have taken the car or any other subject that is part of the everyday life of our contemporaries

The subject of the video is homeopathy, as a practitioner and also a defender of homeopathy, he can not say that he has no interests to defend here.

Defend his job and the subject of his job, if it were to be considered a conflict of interest (which should not be confused with his interest in this job) it would make any worker in conflict of interest with his profession, under the only pretext that he lives and receives a salary. It's not very serious!
A conflict of interest situation arises when an individual or organization has to deal with multiple opposing interests, at least one of which could corrupt the motivation to act on others, or at least give that impression. Wikipedia
Definition
The conflict of interest is not defined by French law. It can, however, commonly be defined as a conflict between the mission of a public official and his or her private interests, a conflict that may influence the way in which he carries out his duties. In other words, the conflict of interest may potentially call into question the neutrality and impartiality with which the person must fulfill his mission because of his personal interests.
https://droit-finances.commentcamarche. ... definition
Is this the case of this homeopath? Given the speech he made to "Boiron" (so often cited as a drug industry too) without mentioning it elsewhere, it is not on this side that we must look.

sen-no-sen »06 / 02 / 19, 20: 34

Regarding hypnosis meditation and sophrology it is difficult to say that his therapies would be effective or not in the sense that they require active work on the part of the subject.

Hypnosis requires an abandonment, a "blind" trust in its hypnotist, so faith, which is not very active!
Sophrology based on semi hypnosis does require semi-abandonment and active participation.

Great meditators are capable of real prodigies (increase of body temperature, slow heart rate, increased concentration etc ...) but such a level is only possible with training.

This actually raises the question of works or faith that has worked great minds on the subject. But both are equally valuable and important! Sometimes it's the abandonment that works best, other times the action.
For example, a person who drowns and does not know how to swim should let herself go to the death that awaits him or she must abandon herself in the arms of a rescuer and get out of it alive. But if she knows how to swim and her life is not in danger, the intervention of a lifeguard is not necessary.

Herbal medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, pharmaco-chemistry is part of the field of therapies that work effortlessly on the part of the patient.

Not really ! Herbal medicine requires active participation because it is only an extension, more targeted, of the food act.
Acupuncture is more special because it is too specific to be practiced either (try to plant needles in the back in very specific places, it is a sport reserved for contortionists, and even .) except in accessible places, for those who know acupuncture obviously.
Homeopathy is also very specific and except self-medication, it requires a great knowledge that is not the lot of everyone, what explains this homeopath. But unlike the phyto that is known and practiced for millennia in the West, its specificity is such that it upsets and questions the weight medicine as quantum mechanics challenges the Newtonian mechanics.
But the great meditators are rare (and not less sick than the others since the same causes produce the same effects) and the rest of the humans resort to external interventions that can solve their problems of organic or psychic disorder, and that allow these various methods of care (and still you do not evoke the other methods of diagnosis as with dowsing, care like magnetism, fire-cutters, bone-cutters, etc ...)

[perseus]

Hello,

In other words, the conflict of interest may potentially call into question the neutrality and impartiality with which the person must accomplish his mission because of his personal interests. [/ I]
https://droit-finances.commentcamarche. ... definition
Is this the case of this homeopath?

"potentially" yes.
And again, it's just a matter of saying it and recognizing it. This in no way constitutes an argument for denying him the right to express himself or invalidating his arguments. But he is an actor, a stakeholder of the subject (homeopathy), a practitioner and even a lobbyist (not to hear him in the negative sense). He is not neutral and has an interest at least professional, personal and perhaps more if it turns out he is a representative of his corporation. And so what shocks me is that it asks for the conflicts of interest of an interlocutor without even objectively positioning himself.

@+

[Janic]

Hello,

Janic quoted:
In other words, the conflict of interest may potentially call into question the neutrality and impartiality with which the person must fulfill his mission because of his personal interests. [/ I]
https://droit-finances.commentcamarche. ... definition
Is this the case of this homeopath?

potentially "yes.
And again, it's just a matter of saying it and recognizing it. This in no way constitutes an argument for denying him the right to express himself or invalidating his arguments. But he is an actor, a stakeholder of the subject (homeopathy), a practitioner and even a lobbyist (not to hear him in the negative sense). He is not neutral and has an interest at least professional, personal and perhaps more if it turns out he is a representative of his corporation. And so what shocks me is that it asks for the conflicts of interest of an interlocutor without even objectively positioning himself.

It will seriously complicate the case.
In general when we talk about conflict of interest as I mentioned before, it is not the professional side in relation to a profession, but in relation to external influences that can be financial, promotional, etc. ...
Is that the case ? In appearance yes, since he promotes the H, he practices professionally and even teaches and all the subtlety is there. Are all the teachers in our universities in conflict of interest since, in the medical field in particular, many of the investments or materials provided come from the drug industries. Obviously no, even if they take advantage of it because of their salary. But some yes, of course when their promotion depends on it, when the funds needed for particular studies, for industrial purposes, are just subsidized by these industries.
Not easy to find !
We must proceed by comparison. Is this homeopath subsidized by any industry? Is his work and research financed by any body? Obviously, if this is not the case (so evidence to support it) it is hardly a conflict of interest, except for the method H itself. But it's valid, in this case, for any professional, again! In my job, he also probably and except to be a business leader, I worked for a salary: point bar. The entrepreneur looking for markets to sustain it: is it in conflict of interest when buying materials and even materials for its production? It can be assumed, but it is not very serious! And yet, according to your formula, he represents (symbolically) his corporation, except to be part of any union or to be paid directly by the industrialists from whom he supplies himself.
Is this the case for B? Personally I do not know and I listened to his 3 interventions where he proceeds by comparison between his approach, on the scientific level, to the opposite of the chemical industry as a David against a Goliath. (for those who really know this biblical episode there is enough to meditate on these two situations) comparable to the same "fight" between vaccinalists or not!