The homeopathy explained metaphorically for Dummies

[perplex]

@Janic
We are not so far after all.


You don't have to answer me and I don't want to make off topic, but good.
What do you think of :

[izentrop]

Not without the right subject and in addition you advertise him to this crook.

Neither should you tickle Janic on this subject, he will still fill pages with his anti-tank propaganda.

[perplex]

I don't see how: Casanova is a crook? he preaches that yes!

The hospital that doesn't give a damn about charity side page of useless writing you and your comrade from "JE" Ahmed, you could both cover France with A4 luckily it's electronic ...

A ++

[Janic]

@Janic
We are not so far after all.
You don't have to answer me and I don't want to make off topic, but good.
What do you think of :

His videos are full of common sense, quite simply! If we are attentive to the loan of his speech, he advocates preventive behavior, that is to say avoiding diseases in general, regardless of the name given to them. Then as few individuals have "natural" preventive behaviors, it goes without saying that strengthening, even belatedly, a failing immune system (food, stress of all kinds) it is necessary to face it whether it is with juice, fasting, H, hot, cold, etc ... and even as a last resort, for lack of knowledge, with allopathy (except vaccines of course! )

NB: Do not titillate Izentrop on this subject either, it will still fill pages with its false propaganda provac.

[perplex]

I follow you, it delivers a message of common sense!

A ++

[izentrop]

I don't see how: Casanova is a crook? he preaches that yes!

Yes, the word was a bit too strong, he's just a bit of a guru and conspiratorial "intoxicator". Everyone is free to listen to it and to buy or not their juicers. http://les-intoxicateurs.over-blog.com/ ... s-cru.html

[Janic]

perplex wrote: I don't see how: Casanova is a crook? he preaches that yes!

Yes, the word was a little too loud, he's just a kind of guru and conspiratorial "intoxicator". Everyone is free to listen to it and to buy or not their juicers. http://les-intoxicateurs.over-blog.com/ ...s-cru.html

He is funny the guy it was a little too strong even when he spends his time bashing, insulting, lying. As a conspirator and an intoxicant it is difficult to do better.
The Intoxicators
Demystify and denounce the Intoxicators who harm our Republic, based on progress and rationality
And after that stand at attention to glorify this progress and this rationality, hers to say the least.
This sad character does not even realize that he uses the arguments he denounces in his articles.
Besides, the end of his article is quite a program!

they will find themselves embarked on an experiment which risks depriving them of conventional means of healing,
It's funny we have to say that to the 150.000 deaths from cancer, to the 140.000 cardiovascular deaths, linked conventional means of… To die, in this case; plus the 50.000 deaths from alcohol, the 70.000 from tobacco, etc… the conventional means in question seem to be in a situation of failure rather than success.

Rethinking one's diet and lifestyle can be useful, but surely not at the risk of losing everything, by unconditionally and only following the advice of Thierry Casasnovas' videos.
It is certain that by doing nothing and unconditionally following conventional means, everything will go for the best in the best of all worlds, the figures above demonstrate it.

[izentrop]

the conventional means in question seem to be in a situation of failure rather than success.

Nevertheless, he almost went there by refusing them and following only his instincts and the gurus. Already he must not have been well vaccinated to catch tuberculosis. https://lachainedevv.com/wp-content/upl ... raphie.pdf

[Janic]

Janic wrote:
the conventional means in question seem to be in a situation of failure rather than success.

Nevertheless, he almost went there by refusing them and following only his instincts and the gurus.

People who almost went there, after the kind of life he had, it's almost the rule!

Already he must not have been well vaccinated to catch tuberculosis.

Ouarf! You therefore consider that the BCG vaccination was of the pipeau since this vaccination was of no use to him.

The number of tuberculosis cases continues to drop steadily in France according to a study made public on Tuesday, March 21. It shows that stopping compulsory BCG in 2007 in favor of targeted vaccination had no negative impact

Stopping compulsory BCG did not cause a resurgence of tuberculosis
Sorrowful or catastrophic minds were wrong. The compulsory BCG discontinuation in 2007 did not cause a resurgence of tuberculosis in France. This is the finding of a study published Tuesday, March 21 by Public Health France (1), an agency which reports to the Ministry of Health. Since 2007, the number of tuberculosis cases has steadily declined in children born after 2006 who are no longer subject to compulsory vaccination. "We see that the targeted vaccination policy, aimed at the most exposed children, has proven its effectiveness," says Dr. Daniel Levy-Bruhl, epidemiologist and head of the respiratory infections and vaccinations unit at Public Health. France: BCG was first used in France in 1921. But we had to wait ... 80% of the article remains to be read.
https://www.la-croix.com/Sciences-et-et ... 1200833674

See also the "myth" of the heroes Pasteur / Koch sur Arte this afternoon at 15pm
https://lachainedevv.com/wp-content/upl ... raffia.pdf

On the other hand, this view of the Casasnovas experience is interesting (what would he say, him?)
Unfortunately, here again, dietetics, which can make up for many errors, is not about miracles, but knowledge of physiology and time to repair past errors.
If one relies on what he visually presents about his state of health, the wrong course has passed.
There is a saying that you learn more from your mistakes than from your successes.

[izentrop]

Already he must not have been well vaccinated to catch tuberculosis.
Ouarf! You therefore consider that the BCG vaccination was of the pipeau since this vaccination was of no use to him.

What can be said today about the effectiveness of BCG administered in childhood?
BCG is effective for protection against extrapulmonary forms (mainly meningitis and miliary). The protective power is very probably between 75% and 85%. Efficacy is more disputed against pulmonary forms. Protective power is around 50% [1]. It could be lower [2] or higher (Swedish estimates from successive changes in vaccine policy). The term of protection is estimated at around fifteen years.

He was unlucky in fact http://www.em-consulte.com/rmr/article/178733