GMO = poison, cancer, diseases ... according to Pr. Séralini

[Rabbit]

Russian study proves that GMOs will sterilize humanity after 3 Generations

Cool it will bring down the real estate.

indeed, the drawbacks of a product are only really measured over several generations in a row: at least 4 to 5 and for humans it's 100 to 125 years!

And m .... (In other words Damn)! I will not take advantage of it.

[Obamot]

Russian study proves that GMOs will sterilize humanity after 3 Generations

Cool it will bring down the real estate.

indeed, the drawbacks of a product are only really measured over several generations in a row: at least 4 to 5 and for humans it's 100 to 125 years!

And m .... (In other words Damn)! I will not take advantage of it.

Tsss, not so fast! With: the resurgence of degenerative diseases, fatty acids "TRANS", white sugar and all kinds of sodas, denatured oils, the abuse of meat products, white flours (and all these refined and devitalized products), the food bowl with too many acidifiers, sedentary lifestyle, etc. This has been the case for a very long time (well over seventy years since the lines started to "die out"). So statistically, that shouldn't change much, alas!

And it is already much faster, than 4 or 5 generations. Who hasn't seen someone in their family who has had cancer or allergies?

Which obviously doesn't mean that we have to tolerate GMOs ...!

[Janic]

obamot hello

Which obviously doesn't mean that we have to tolerate GMOs ...!

This is however already the case ... hypocritically rejected on one side and otherwise implicitly accepted. Long live the lobbies!

[Obamot]

obamot hello

Which obviously doesn't mean that we have to tolerate GMOs ...!

This is however already the case ... hypocritically rejected on one side and otherwise implicitly accepted. Long live the lobbies!

Certainly, but is there something more in your remarks?

If so, I don't quite understand. If you mean by that that the industrialists take advantage of the weakness of the controls and the flaws of the system bequeathed by the health authorities: then yes, they do it to donf ....

Except they forget that consumers don't want it in their vast majority (except that the sacrosanct "law of the market" does not apply in this case, but only in those who would be favorable to them, as usual ... what a sad similarity with the financial sector), which does not therefore prevent them from continuing to cheat with immense arrogance in claiming that their private preserve would be essential to save the world from famine. While we know that it is false and that it would even be the opposite. Fortunately, many poor small-scale farmers do not even have the means to buy seeds (which they would not want for anything in the world anyway ...)

When will the nationalization of the breeders subsidized sufficiently as they should be by the Ministry of Agriculture in the interest of the concern for the preservation of biodiversity? (And not paid / controlled by the grain farmers!)

[Janic]

obamot hello

Janic wrote:

Obamot wrote:
Which obviously doesn't mean that we have to tolerate GMOs ...!

This is however already the case ... hypocritically rejected on one side and otherwise implicitly accepted. Long live the lobbies!

Certainly, but is there something more in your remarks?
If so, I don't quite understand. If you mean by that that the industrialists take advantage of the weakness of the controls and the flaws of the system bequeathed by the health authorities: then yes, they do it to donf ....

Both my captain!
On the one hand, a government which, under pressure from part of the medical profession and from public opinion, says no; and on the other, this same public opinion which consumes the aforementioned products while pretending not to know it (or not to care) because believing in another part of the medical profession which says the opposite (perhaps under the influence lobbies, but it's not even sure!) The inevitable battle and controversy of "scientific experts" that we find in TOUS domains (including those that I often cite). The lobbies are certainly influential and very powerful, but they would be nothing without these "scientific experts" who prove them right!

[Christophe]

Small summary in a picture of the "advantages" of GMOs:

[izentrop]

For once that "Le Monde" is not in the escalation of disinformation on biotechnologies, it must be emphasized...

[Janic]

izmentrop who is still spreading his vomit!