Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Bah woué, choose the effigy of JR as a mockery, there must be some truth to kekpart

Indeed, JR wants to destroy Bobby.

[Obamot]

Who was persecuted why and under whose impulse already? And this after big betrayal of the aunt of the mother of Jules who was finally born under “x” but who in fact was the brother of his wife's sister? Is that why she was drinking so much from episode 275, okay?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

SHE DRINKS GLYPHOSATE !!!

[Obamot]

Everything holds! Easy ...!

[izentrop]

In Canada, same problem as everywhere else, the media and politicians instrumentalize science, for fear of the reaction of environmentalists

The debate over glyphosate in Canada and around the world is populist, chaotic, political and downright disturbing. Many groups are instrumentalizing scientific research with one or more of the following objectives: either to support the use of the well-known chemical, popularized as Roundup, or to declare it carcinogenic and toxic. Some media and researchers unfortunately treat science as an all-you-can-eat buffet, carefully selecting research to fit a certain narrative. This distressing situation has persisted for years.

By known standards, a person should eat at least 32 bowls of Cheerios per day for over a year to approach the limit suggested by Health Canada. In addition, this threshold is at least 100 times lower than levels that can have a harmful impact on a person's health.

Many studies suggesting the harmfulness of glyphosate often set standards out of nowhere.

Unsurprisingly, there are many environmentalists and organic farming groups behind numerous reports condemning the use of glyphosate. For years these same groups waged war against genetically modified organisms, GMOs, only to realize that frankenfood fear campaigns were not working.

There is a certain consensus building around glyphosate, but this is rarely said publicly. In total, 17 regulatory agencies and thousands of studies have assessed the impact of glyphosate on human health and the environment.

A major European Union report, released in June, but shunned by most of the mainstream media in Canada, found glyphosate not to be carcinogenic. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2021 ... concludes/

Let's stop using science as if it were an all-you-can-eat buffet to pick the reports that support some of our preconceptions. https://plus.lapresse.ca/screens/c34cc3 ... C___0.html

Also valid for many thorny subjects dealt with in this forum.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Izy posts us once more SHIT, and the worst:
Copied / pasted on the EFSA website:

The national authorities of France, Hungary, the Netherlands and Sweden - known as the Glyphosate Assessment Panel (AGG) - have reviewed all the evidence submitted by companies who are applying for a renewal of the authorization to market the substance in the EU. The AGG draft report is approximately 11 pages long.

Looks like a macabre farce !!!!

[Janic]

Let us stop using science as if it were an all-you-can-eat buffet in order to choose the reports that strengthen some of our preconceived ideas. forum.

well done, take it as personally addressed to you. AFIS is not a scientific body but only pseudo-scientific accredited by no official authority.

So in the kennel you too, the red pug!

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

11000 pages of "evidence" provided by those who want to sell the product in Europe ... and Izy calls it "science". Pathetic buffoon!

[izentrop]

Huh like what

publi.jpg (51.11 KiB) Viewed 925 times

comments.jpg (52.32 KiB) Viewed 925 times

Details of the images showing the castings in shambles

[Obamot]

Yes and...

- “Oh miracle, glyphosate didn't kill everything

Oh joy! Um, wow and so, you talk about a victory! (Hey, that rhymes with '_onnard'

do you know that this toxic product is not eliminated as by a snap of the finger from the human body?