Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Izy, that's how it suits him. One blow is AFIS, one blow INSERM, one blow the FNSEA, one blow the Nazeticians, one blow the communication leaflets of the labs, one blow the Express, one blow the World and one blow ... Paracelsus (died 1541). Imagine the mental mush!

[Janic]

what do you want, for this kind of type, everything is good in the pig (the most parasitized animal as if by chance!)

[Exnihiloest]

 
Glyphosate authorization renewal file: the 4 reporting countries, including France, confirm what all the world health agencies tell us: glyphosate is NOT carcinogenic

https://leblogaa.blogspot.com/2021/06/p ... se-il.html

I do not despair of seeing him return to Casto ...

[izentrop]

Good news for the climate in agricultural use.
At Casto, not at all.

For biodiversity, I find all these wild plants that grow in the smallest crevices in the city. We did not see that from the time when glyphosate was used in excess by individuals and municipal teams.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

We can't wait to serve it in the canteens ...

[Obamot]

 
Glyphosate authorization renewal file: the 4 reporting countries, including France, confirm what all the world health agencies tell us: glyphosate is NOT carcinogenic

https://leblogaa.blogspot.com/2021/06/p ... se-il.html

I do not despair of seeing him return to Casto ...

If the only problem with glyphosate was its carcinogenesis - and it is established by Prof. Seralini - it would be known ... just as much as is established “How to do a study on glyphosate without it developing cancer in purebred female white mice”. This debate is definitively closed, because glyphosate poses other problems which are also known and mentioned many times. We are not going to repeat the story of “Agent Orange” and other filth ...

[Janic]

and those wankers who still believe with this sweet naivety, this freshness of mind, that this product is non-carcinogenic because it is supposed not to be alone. Cancers rarely develop from a single product (except at high doses and repeatedly as in the lab), but from the presence of other factors that are themselves not or only slightly carcinogenic.
So the nitrate alone is not very dangerous, the glycerin even less, but together it gives a powerful explosive.
However, no lab does cumulative tests with the multitude of other products spread on earth, thus accumulating substances, very explosive when they are assembled. This is why for more than 70 years, researchers have been breaking their teeth on such a complex problem that no means or product can solve ... obviously! And when, with announcement effects, they find a new miracle product (very, very expensive) which will work a little bit and on only a few individuals, it falls into oblivion shortly after.

[ABC2019]

So the nitrate alone is not very dangerous, the glycerin even less, but together it gives a powerful explosive.

no it gives nothing at all, it's not the nitrate (which one by the way?), it's nitric acid which produces nitroglycerin (and nitric acid is quite dangerous anyway !!)

However, no lab does cumulative tests with the multitude of other products spread on earth, thus accumulating substances, very explosive when they are assembled. This is why for more than 70 years, researchers have been breaking their teeth on such a complex problem that no means or product can solve ... obviously! And when, with announcement effects, they find a new miracle product (very, very expensive) which will work a little bit and on only a few individuals, it falls into oblivion shortly after.

at the same time, it's not a problem, since we have H. to cure everything.

[Janic]

no it gives nothing at all, it's not the nitrate (which one by the way?), it's nitric acid which produces nitroglycerin (and nitric acid is quite dangerous anyway !!)

as much for me! I stayed with Mac Gyver!
Nitric acid is a strong acid, found in nature as salts (nitrates) and chemical formula HNO3. Nitric acid is a strong oxidizer which attacks almost all metals. Because of its ability to separate gold from silver by dissolving the latter, it was previously called “etching”.

at the same time, it's not a problem, since we have H. to cure everything.

and patatra! After saying something sane, he breaks his mouth and immediately says a huge bullshit, but what else could we expect? Con one day, con always!

[Obamot]

No, what he said was not even “smart”, basically you were right

Explosion in Beirut: [...] stocks of ammonium nitrate
one of the main compounds of nitrogen fertilizers used in agriculture but also for the production of explosives.

https://www.heidi.news/sciences/ce-que- ... -en-suisse

In addition, glyphosate is completely obsolete when used on its own.

The chemical VRP sells prohibited ancillary products, and the unconscious but engaged peasants in a gear, concoct cocktails of pesticides on the edges of the fields, it is pure permanent experimentation in vivo, which has never been tested. . Therein lies the major risk (already because almost any synthetic chemical molecule among more than 40 potentially in contact with us is likely to cause inflammation) so these DEFOLIANTS WERE CREATED TO KILL LIFE and not to do anything beneficial for it...

Glyphosates have specific directions to follow when the average consumer uses them to kill common weeds in our gardens.

To be considered "safe", these instructions must be followed:
- Choose a day that is not rainy or windy;
- Wear long pants, a long-sleeved shirt, gloves, protective glasses and a mask;
- Cover any other plants you want to keep safe.

And what happens if we omit this?

I don't know what it is for others, but which housewife has a vegetable patch, reads the bottles and follows the instructions? Even the peasants expose themselves enormously to its products and overdose ...

Personally, having read the Séralini study (and having understood its content) I would strongly advise that pets stay away. Unfortunately there are dogs, cows, chickens on the farms, and there is therefore de facto contamination.

Because the manufacturer says keep animals and people away until the product is completely dry - who applies that (?) ... nobody) and the manufacturer doesn't explain Why you must take these precautions ... If it is not harmful, then why such precautions?

And of course, the experimentation does not take into account the “a little negligent” and a little naive (or lax) behavior which is characteristic of the human being in everyday life ... strict according to the manufacturer's data. This is why this type of product, which is ultra-dangerous for nature, should be banned. These defoliants taken from “Agent Orange” used in Vietnam as a military weapon against civilians and the Vietcong, are made to defoliate and / or create sequelae and kill.