Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Moindreffor » 18/08/20, 13:21

Obamot wrote:
Moindreffor wrote:
Obamot wrote:It depends my little plug ... You are the great specialist ... (and I did not create anything, nor anything fell from the sky, believe me ...) :)

Do you want it in recovery from deficits after a bio-check or in UI? Image

well we would just like to see one that you call balanced, we let you choose the units ...

In WHO IU then (Môssieur the chemist who does not even know the basics, or has too short a memory).
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit%C3%A9_internationale

So it is not from me!
In UI = International Units, because I believe that for a “biocheck” you are definitely lost for science.

Moindreffor wrote: because he is like Arlésienne, you talk about it a lot, but we never see him ...


In fact "from Arlésienne are you still unaware that the WHO has long defined our vitamin and nutrient requirements : Shock:
https://www.burgerstein.ch/fr/quelle-es ... t-ui-ie-iu

and to see them, (if you understood something) you would have to go back to a time when you had not even started your studies, it is to say how much you walk us with your pseudo formation of chemist , who has by far never reached the most elementary threshold of knowledge to judge ... to the point of considering “non-dangerous” the fact of seasoning his salads with mineral oil (which we use by elsewhere to lubricate internal combustion engines)! : roll: : Shock:

And the funniest part of all this (not to say hilarious) is that you are going to praise the merits of the lazy man's vegetable garden ... : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy: you wonder how you can be sick like a dog !? You're making savings? You eat industrial croquettes, instead of your vegetable production, right? : Shock: : roll: Since you are so diligent in permaculture, you would have to obtain without delay the table of all the International Unit values ​​of the foods you eat, but I fear that at this stage you will treat the WHO of “ guru ”, and the values ​​for the croquettes are missing. : Mrgreen:

(still watch out for the perchlorethylene in the salad) post405410.html # p405410

why, come out of old stories that some have buried and that you would do well to bury yourself, because you can doubt my skills, but I have a university background, and I still have friends and not only in chemistry , so when I talk about a lawyer I'm talking about my friend from college and not the vegetable, so don't push the issue too far ..., computer harassment is also a crime, like incitement to take the life of others in danger ... and before filing a complaint there is the handrail, it allows to accumulate ...

otherwise your personal version of the balanced food bowl, still not?

otherwise, I already have all the tables of all the vegetables with their average composition in mg of each of the main minerals, and vitamins so worry you I know, when we have to be very careful about what we eat because that life depends on it we have to know what we eat, I just want to know your version of yours, because apart from insulting us, we never see anything concrete in your answers, so for once just try to answer the question we ask you, because if your science is just putting a link to us, I am not afraid of the comparison
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 18/08/20, 13:47

I will never tell you what “you should”Put in your food bowl (so that it is balanced) I do not do nursing, not even in your dreams. I don't even do it with my relatives who are enlightened enough to have understood it for themselves.

Moindreffor wrote: like incitement to endanger the life of others ...
What you do regularly with your amazing words.
And if you don't want your noses in it, avoid posting your turds. :)

Moindreffor wrote:otherwise your personal version of the balanced food bowl, still not?

Troll reflection, I just did better, I gave the keys to build it myself,
you just have to make the effort to check with the WHO to find out if your food intake corresponds to the prescriptions of the scientists who developed it.
Better yet, you have the tool to check if your own biology is in the nails, thanks to the biocheck. And contrary to your fears, I leave to everyone the choice to get information (from the WHO and elsewhere) and to put what they want in their food bowl (you still haven't understood that diets are useless .)

You really are a muffle for wanting to question that. There is only concert in my answers and your paintings are not enough. You should listen to Prof. Joyeux who knows how to describe exactly what would be “the mistakes to be made” to (alas) lead to the pathologies that are yours.

"Good continuation !
0 x
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Moindreffor » 18/08/20, 14:05

Obamot wrote:
Moindreffor wrote: like incitement to endanger the life of others ...
What you do regularly with your amazing words.
And if you don't want your noses in it, avoid posting your turds. :)

Moindreffor wrote:otherwise your personal version of the balanced food bowl, still not?

Troll reflection, I just did better, I gave the keys to build it myself,
you just have to make the effort to check with the WHO to find out if your food intake corresponds to the prescriptions of the scientists who developed it.
Better yet, you have the tool to check if your own biology is in the nails, thanks to the biocheck. And contrary to your fears, I leave to everyone the choice to get information (from the WHO and elsewhere) and to put what they want in their food bowl (you still haven't understood that diets are useless .)

You really are a muffle for wanting to question that. There is only concert in my answers and your paintings are not enough. You should listen to Prof. Joyeux who describes exactly “the mistakes to be made” to (alas) lead to the pathologies that are yours.

for the first part, from experience I am careful to talk about myself and my personal experience, and I am very careful with what I write, and therefore even if I post turds like you say, encourage the person to put his life in danger, or insulting him absolutely does not minimize your responsibility

the short skirt of the young lady, does not relieve the rapist of responsibility ... even if a simpleton boasts of being able to steal, inciting him to throw himself out of the tenth to prove it will make you responsible for his death ...

once again I don't question anything, you talk about a balanced food bowl, you are asked what it is for you, is it complicated to answer, me what interests me when I discuss with someone c is the opinion of this person, otherwise I will argue with those you quote and you are of no interest to me, since you have no personal opinion, I can type in google like you

I think that you do not live through the lives of others, so when I debate with Obamot, it is Obamot's opinion that interests me the opinion of Pierre, Paul or Jacques
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 18/08/20, 14:24

It's crazy how predictable and destructive you are, you flop. Mythos' remarks have no significance. It wasn't just the grotesque ones about “mineral oils and other healthy paraffins” : Cheesy: but your successive plants on the acid-base balance, and on fatty acids! Your ignorance of the subject is minimal, contrary to what you say.

If there were even the tiniest chance that your request is sincere, the tiniest chance that it could bear fruit, and if I knew you well enough, I would tell you (At one time I was doing very popular radio shows on this subject)

But I answer you anyway for the basis of the reasoning. I never said that the same food bowl should be suitable for everyone (that's ideal). A sedentary person does not have the same needs as a construction worker in winter.

Start by giving your urine pH immediately, then it would be well to suggest that you do a biocheck, no one can tell you in advance what specifically you need (or what to correct) unless you are a diviner.

Do not ask me more, before taking care of your body, you should also think of taking care of your mind and think of consulting.
0 x
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Moindreffor » 19/08/20, 18:53

Obamot wrote:If there was even the tiniest chance that your request was sincere, the tiniest chance that it could bear fruit, and if I knew you well enough, I would tell you

here you do not know me, but you are able to judge my sincerity and the scope of what you could say to me, so yes indeed, you said everything
when you are asked questions that bother you, you do a pirouette and you do not answer them, so I will leave you with your certainties to avoid the word belief
1 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 19/08/20, 19:17

Always so predictable and destructive ... I didn't judge you, you asked me about the “food bowl”, claiming that I knew an ideal composition of the latter ... (or what do I know ... from your fantasies ...).

However, I had proceeded by exclusion (instead of composition) by specifying to Exnihiloest that the foods it listed (among which: hot drinks, fries, crisps, grilled meat, red meat, bread white, white pasta, milk, cold cuts, peanuts, canned tomato, soft drinks, white flour, salted fish, alcohol, refined sugar ... and for you I would have added them mineral oils :) )


[were] foods that are NOT required AT ALL for a balanced bolus ...)
post407295.html # p407295


I never spoke of yours, nor of a bowl in particular, so I gave an appropriate answer, you should have rejoiced (but you made a fool of it, aaah the mythos ...) and then hey , if one day someone wants a braid in butter, to my knowledge it will not kill him, so you exaggerate, on the other hand, to put mineral oil in his salad ...

No question upsets you, it's only the answers we give you that bother you ... (apparently since you don't answer)

What about your urine pH value, still not? : Wink:

Hey hey ...
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by izentrop » 23/08/20, 03:17

Christophe wrote:Now pro glyphosates lobbyists become terrorists !! : Evil: : Evil: : Evil:
"Doctors diagnose organophosphate poisoning."
Glyphosate is not one of them and symptoms are more consistent with the substance, especially in a confined environment https://www.liberation.fr/terre/2020/08 ... te_1797161
http://www.ecosociosystemes.fr/organophosphores.html

It's "funny" this habit of accusing before the facts.
My mother always said to turn her tongue ten times in her mouth before speaking : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 15992
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5188

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Remundo » 23/08/20, 13:47

izentrop wrote:
organophosphates. "
Glyphosate is not one of them
My mother always said to turn her tongue ten times in her mouth before speaking : Mrgreen:

Ah yes the big ax agitator? below is the structural formula of glyphosate:

Image

on holiday homework, you will look for the symbol of phosphorus in the classification of elements and the notion of "organic" in chemistry.
1 x
Image
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Christophe » 23/08/20, 14:34

izentrop wrote:My mother always said to turn her tongue ten times in her mouth before speaking : Mrgreen:


Well, obviously you weren't listening to your mother ... because bullshit right now you're doing a ton : Mrgreen:
3 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting




by Obamot » 23/08/20, 14:50

: Mrgreen:

Izentrop, who was it again? It was not the friend ”scientific”To Pedrodelavega and Sicetaitsimple? What was defending tooth and nail ABC2019 “in the name of science”? To the point that this one had made of them a pseudo group “reference experts”(Self-proclaimed) !? ... pouf ... pouf ... pouf : Cheesy:

Will he tell us:

1) nothing, he will not answer?
2) sorry I was wrong?
3) I maintain what I said, “I am better off” than Raoult and Montagnier combined?
4) I was also a dunce in chemistry?
5) sorry i don't know anything, i'm like that, i'm a troll?
6) there I went too far, I do not know what to say, I am so ashamed that I will not come back?
Last edited by Obamot the 23 / 08 / 20, 15: 16, 1 edited once.
1 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 317 guests