eclectron wrote:Jenna blossoms
Let's be serious, a minimum ...
https://www.editions-tredaniel.com/jenn ... -3983.html
eclectron wrote:Jenna blossoms
chase the natural and it comes back at a gallop!Not complicated, I too can play stupid.
Janic wrote:chase the natural and it comes back at a gallop!Not complicated, I too can play stupid.
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:...
No, but he doesn't play. He is. It is his nature AND a second nature. We are quiet until tomorrow (Maybe) he has to watch his little series on Netflix.
Not complicated, I too can play stupid. The difference is that at eclectron it is not a compositional role.
Exnihiloest wrote:You have become a stupid, callous being who violently rejects anything that passes above you.
Not complicated, I too can play stupid. The difference is that at eclectron it is not a compositional role.
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:eclectron wrote:Jenna blossoms
Let's be serious, a minimum ...
https://www.editions-tredaniel.com/jenn ... -3983.html
Exnihiloest wrote:GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:...
No, but he doesn't play. He is. It is his nature AND a second nature. We are quiet until tomorrow (Maybe) he has to watch his little series on Netflix.
Ahmed wrote:Eclectron, you write:Already, I am not sure of the "deliberately", because once the finger in the improvement of his living conditions, it is difficult not to continue.
Deliberately, because it was one of the ideological conditions that justified the process. The improvement in living conditions is only an observation relating to a recent condition; in reality, the starting point of the industrial revolution (which was industrial in name only) turned out to constitute a considerable degradation of these same conditions for the great majority of the population and the continuation of the process cannot be sustained. 'explain by a massive adhesion to the "project". Likewise, the current reversal should make things less "comfortable", in the usual sense of the term.
Further:In this the process would be natural, let us say rather, understandable.
Natural would be fair if one relates it to the conditions favorable to a greater energy dissipation, and understandable according to this criterion.
Again:knowing does not correct the problem.
Of course! This is insufficient, but nevertheless a necessary prerequisite. To act against it, we must first recognize the point of inflection and its insidious translation into language which is anything but innocent.
As for the sacred, it only moves towards the all-powerful market and the so-called "materialism" is only a mediocre spiritualization of the commodity.
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Users browsing this forum : Remundo and 388 guests