31/03/23, 20:58
You wrote: "Our experience, confirming the American and Canadian study on VGs demonstrates the inaccuracy of official discourses on the subject."
No luck, the study says the opposite of what you say about the B12, which was the subject.....
if you can't read, go back to school.
Hence the importance of quoting your sources rather than having them tell nonsense, and even the opposite of what they say .... It forces (normally?) to reread them before quoting them. Except being a liar/manipulator.
rightly quotes, from this source in question, a single passage affirming that the VGs analyzed are lacking
[*]real of B12. You are confusing, as usual, a precautionary recommendation with tangible proof of a deficiency that has proven to be almost non-existent. So do a little biology before you get out your nonsense.
[*] the average rate accepted being that measured in "omnivores" consuming animals already supplemented like Pauling with his doses of synthetic vit C.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré