And that's not enough for him, it's astonishing! In short...
Janic wrote:On the other hand, we will have more precise data on the individual effectiveness of vaccines on people vaccinated compared to those who are not.
Janic wrote:
as long as we find ourselves with a total and equivalent number of people vaccinated or not, which got off to a bad start with the anxiety-provoking policy that was made with the elderly populations and where there will be hardly any unvaccinated people left.
No matter what, with a few% of the population vaccinated it will be possible to measure the effectiveness or not of the vaccines on these people in relation to those of the same profile, mainly age, who are not.
Almost impossible to do precisely since, willingly or under constraint, there will be no more "old" unvaccinated available. The one and only check of real effectiveness is to put the vaccinated in physical contact with the patients. contaminants to verify the result as has happened historically for all infectious diseases.
And for that we need a real follow-up of the vaccinated, by pharmacovigilance, which is impossible when they are counted in the millions.
Monitoring impossible since the French will not be able to choose the vaccine they want. And that there is no global vaccine plan. Does this mean that they do not care and do not themselves believe in the dangerousness of the virus? At the very least a mess and monster incompetence in fact. And even that, the “facebook experts” do not criticize him.
When a collective of 60 caregivers including 000 doctors told us that:
- hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin especially, are very good, and heal you of this dirt sometimes in 48 hours
- vaccinating against SARS-cov-2 is not the moment, that there are not significantly enough cases to justify it ...
- that the measures taken at the political level under the pretext of health are liberticidal
- etc ...
I think it goes very far, but on the other hand, does the world have to stop because people have not taken care of their lifestyle and found themselves at the end of the race with comorbidities? ? And that their behavior makes future generations take significant biological risks (and sometimes immediately with anaphylactic shocks in vaccinated doctors, sometimes with death) and since we will not know the consequences of what they call “vaccinations” before 1 century...?
The answer is complicated, but alas yes, since governments have been co-responsible for the marketing authorization of adulterated food for decades on the shelves. This is one of the very obvious causes of the problem that you know very well Janic. It has now been 1 year lost in prevention, for having favored “vaccination”!
The dear little ones can read English, but for French, it would be worth a crash course.