Adrien (ex-nico239) wrote:I have no idea if the measures worthy of a science fiction film to slow down the epidemic of coronavirus are good or not but we can be surprised that the .... tobacco remains open ???
Has tobacco become an essential trade?
If anyone knows the reason it is willingly.
In our village we have no tobacco but only a tobacco bar ...
Will it remain open?
Or only the tobacco activity (again saying this seems absurd) will remain "open"
For the elections I did not exchange with the slightest person who found it justified to maintain them
it doesn't shock me more than that because:
A) what is contaminating is to stay close to each other for a while while sticking to it. A shared meal at a restaurant face to face is much more risky than queuing while keeping your distance, without touching or talking.
B) the current sick rate is still very low. The problem is in the exponential extrapolation, which will peter us to the g ... in a few weeks: doubling in 4 days = multiplication by 4 in one week, by 256 in one month, and by 1000 in six weeks = 4 million sick in six weeks and 60% of the population at the end, with hundreds of thousands of deaths at stake.
But it is multiple chains of contamination that end up with this result. Add ONE unique event in this chain, we don't care. That's not the important thing. The important thing is to change everyday behaviors repeated many times.
For tobacco, I think they want to keep the sale of newspapers open for public access to information and directives.