your approach consists in first selecting the people with whom you agree to form an opinion (in reality to select only those who confirm your opinion), and to eliminate that of those with whom you do not agree. 'agreement. Study the cognitive biases a little, it will do you good.
Once again you attribute to others what you do, but I answer anyway!
Si
je want to build a house, I am speaking to a mason, not a butcher; because I consider that the mason is more competent for this work, but I humbly admit that I did not try to ask a butcher. So actually I automatically eliminate (it confirms my opinion! Arf, arf!
) those who do not have the necessary skills on this subject (building a house, not making charcuterie!
)
But the JOE Methodists never talk about cognitive biases, they never watch videos of it, and the videos they watch never talk about it either.
Leave your method where it can finally be useful: in the toilet!
Your biased cognitive biases, that's your specialty with your bogus method, only recognized by you: the narcissism in question!
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biais_cognitiftaken from your usual reference:
Cognitive biases can be organized into four categories: biases that arise from too much information, not enough sense, the need to act quickly, and memory limitations.
Algorithmic Model: John Manoogian III (jm3)
Organizational Model: Buster Benson.So all you, indisputably! Except that not only do you not have too much information, but not at all, preferring to remain in the dark than in the knowledge! Except that you forget what you wrote and that you do not understand the meaning of what you read too hastily by necessity to answer without thinking.
Perfect model
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré