Advances in the fight against the coronavirus

[ABC2019]

You have to have taken the metro during rush hour and spent a good hour there to understand

Above all, you have to look at the results of studies that study whether there is a significant difference in risk between those who take the metro and those who do not ...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

You have to have taken the metro during rush hour and spent a good hour there to understand

Above all, you have to look at the results of studies that study whether there is a significant difference in risk between those who take the metro and those who do not ...

And well you're going to give them to us, eh, moron clown?

[ABC2019]

You have to have taken the metro during rush hour and spent a good hour there to understand

Above all, you have to look at the results of studies that study whether there is a significant difference in risk between those who take the metro and those who do not ...

And well you're going to give them to us, eh * useless insult *

they are given a few pages before, + 20%, much less than in bars (+ 90%) and discotheques (+ 340%).

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

You have to have taken the metro during rush hour and spent a good hour there to understand

Above all, you have to look at the results of studies that study whether there is a significant difference in risk between those who take the metro and those who do not ...

That's what I'm saying it's propaganda because it has always been impossible to say that taking the metro at rush hour poses a health risk.

Like to say that 99% of the masks used promote the spread of the epidemic

We have always done everything in this crisis to make up the fact that we let the epidemic spread quietly to keep the country in a state of emergency.

[ABC2019]

We have always done everything in this crisis to make up the fact that we let the epidemic spread quietly to keep the country in a state of emergency.

the real reason for letting the epidemic spread "quietly" is not to keep the country in a state of emergency, moreover measures are relaxed when the number of contaminations stagnates or falls. The real reason is to let the virus immunize those for whom the vaccine is not sufficient, or who are not vaccinated, and unfortunately to let die those for whom we will not be able to do anything, in order to end up being able to find a normal life without emergency state. We have seen with the example of countries which have tried the "zero virus" that it does not work either, because it always leaves a large fraction of the population unprotected, so it is only to reduce the problem.

[Ahmed]

This is certainly true, but what a great opportunity, however, to show "his little muscular arms" and make yellow vests invisible, for example ...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

they are given a few pages before, + 20%, much less than in bars (+ 90%) and discotheques (+ 340%).

Propaganda: Are you going out to have fun? You risk big, very big! Do you take the metro or the bus to go to work? No worries. Sounds like a sinister joke.
It must be said that in large cities, stopping public transport would be a real disaster in all areas. So we lie and we leave it open.

[ABC2019]

they are given a few pages before, + 20%, much less than in bars (+ 90%) and discotheques (+ 340%).

Propaganda: Are you going out to have fun? You risk big, very big! Do you take the metro or the bus to go to work? No worries. Sounds like a sinister joke.
It must be said that in large cities, stopping public transport would be a real disaster in all areas. So we lie and we leave it open.

So basically when you don't like the results of a study, you say it's bogus and it's propaganda. That's what I had understood remark.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

It's not as if the bogus studies haven't been making flora for almost two years, to speak only of the pandemic, noooooon ... You don't have to have a brain bigger than a nut to understand that you can't stop public transport in a big city under penalty of screwing up everything (supplies, work, traffic, etc, etc). But you have to believe that yours is smaller ... a lens, maybe ..

[izentrop]

Hello,

We have always done everything in this crisis to make up the fact that we let the epidemic spread quietly to keep the country in a state of emergency.

the real reason for letting the epidemic spread "quietly" is not to keep the country in a state of emergency, moreover measures are relaxed when the number of contaminations stagnates or falls. The real reason is to let the virus immunize those for whom the vaccine is not sufficient, or who are not vaccinated, and unfortunately to let die those for whom we will not be able to do anything, in order to end up being able to find a normal life without emergency state. We have seen with the example of countries which have tried the "zero virus" that it does not work either, because it always leaves a large fraction of the population unprotected, so it is only to reduce the problem.

First of all, bravo for the answers, flawless.
I just wanted to add my two cents: Letting the epidemic spread "quietly" is also letting the economy restart, because it is very expensive to contain.

alas to let die those for whom we will not be able to do anything

On the contrary, as hospitals are no longer congested, we can better treat them.

One can notice a certain constancy among the "conspis", like the scouts: "conspi of a day, conspi always".