Professor Séralini tackles pesticides ...

[Christophe]

After the GMO, Professor Séralini tackles pesticides ( https://www.econologie.com/forums/le-j-accus ... 12057.html )

Pesticides: Pr Séralini's alert

Professor Séralini and his team have just released a new study on pesticides. The tests they carried out would demonstrate the toxicity of pesticides sold and used in intensive agriculture on human health.

Professor Gilles Eric Séralini has just published in Biomed Reseach International a new study on pesticides. The purpose of the study was to compare substances registered by manufacturers with health authorities and products sold to individuals or farmers with reinforced active ingredients. Conclusion: the products on sale are up to 1000 times more toxic.
Pr Séralini is professor of Molecular Biology, co-Director of the Risk, Quality and Sustainable Environment - MRSH-CNRS Department, at the University of Caen, president of the scientific council of CRIIGen.

The interview of Pr Séralini by E.De Miniac in the 12-13 of Saturday 1.02.2014 on France 3 Basse Normandie

http://basse-normandie.france3.fr/2014/ ... 08009.html

[Ahmed]

Too bad (but not at all surprising) that the cancer plan Holland is content to distribute rents to the lab ... and does not attack the causes ...
Thanks to this plan, the already comfortable proportion of people living with cancer will increase compared to those who suffer from it and then die from it.

[Janic]

the majority of cancers are caused by tobacco and alcohol. But attacking the tobacco lobbies is one thing, attacking the alcohol lobbies in all its forms, it would be quite another. Same thing for the food lobbies. But there: not touched, it's too many potential voters!

[Ahmed]

Lobbying explains many things (you forgot the chemical sector), but it is more the ideology common to multinationals and the political oligarchy that is at stake.

[Janic]

ahmed hello

Lobbying explains a lot (you forgot the chemistry sector), but it is more the ideology common to the multinationals and the political oligarchy which is in question.

it is understood in the food industry. But an ideology is useless if it does not find its aficionados ... so we in general!
Whatever the power of these lobbies if they do not find their consumers (and not consumer actors) they only become a balloon that deflates.
If "we" no longer consumed any drug, legal or not, cancer (in question) would return to what it was at the beginning of the 20th century: extremely rare!
Even if, thanks to our vivid imagination, we found other ways to break our pipe very early!
See our sorcerer's apprentices who would like to "impose" the vaccine against uterine cancer in young girls, making mothers feel guilty, and ignoring the damage and suffering already caused.

[phil53]

Think again Janic, the cervical cancer vaccine works very well (on sale)
Even if it is useless since the smears are advised, vaccinated or not

[Janic]

Think again Janic, the cervical cancer vaccine works very well (on sale)

but not enough in the eyes of the labs and the medical profession under their orders;

Even if it is useless since the smears are advised, vaccinated or not

only a friottis is a means of detection, not of treatment or "protection". The vaccine myth is tough!