Health: taxing junk food, foods too fat or sweet?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 09/03/12, 03:26

... and now THE big questions:
- how to make so that they become aware of their own sense of responsibility, and so that they take the fold BEFORE adolescence ...
- how to do it for us adults, so that this situation changes vis-à-vis the legislator to prohibit / limit / tax these products sometimes harmful ... sometimes in excess ... sometimes beneficial ... Because it is not a small matter, since the industrialists will not fail to point out that sugar is the first food of the brain, that the proteins of the meat are essential in a meat diet, ditto for the salt which has its useful properties in the organism. .

When (?) For example, the outright ban of soda dispensers in schools (it started, but it's still very shy ... If we tax sodas, wouldn't it also be better prohibit where they are the most devastating.) When (?) the integration of these questions of junk food in class lessons for toddlers, to deal with the parents' resignation. When will there be measures in well-crafted awareness campaigns on marketing that would make "Has been" consumption of sodas and chocolate bars and other excessive sources of "fast" sugar more in touch for young consumers ... When will (?) the ban of harmful counter-examples by the censorship commissions (to wonder what they are doing) such as the advertisement "Yop" (drink sweetened with Yoplait milk) who makes the mother look like a gourd vis-à-vis the teenager-prescriber "all powerful" It may be "Son Yop", but it is certain that later it will be his diabetes => and that are obviously corporations and decisions of adults who (aur) have allowed all that which is (er) responsible.
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 09/03/12, 12:51

Junk food eaten by grandparents statistically facilitates diabetes in small children !!
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79360
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060




by Christophe » 09/03/12, 12:52

Interesting ah: does genetic food memory exist?
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 09/03/12, 12:59

This is epigenetics, scientifically proven, and whose complex code remains to be discovered, the biggest difference between us and the monkeys !!!

Even if the grandparents suffered a famine too !!

See reports on Arte and A5, the BBC, and read the armada, on wikipedia, google and google scholar at the word epigenetic !!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 09/03/12, 15:05

We know, for example, that a single big stress - like someone who would have murdered one of his fellows (I'm talking about the aggressor ...) - would modify certain markers in himself and over three generations ... or could prove that someone would have committed such an act, laugh that by finding the marker! So junk food and epigenetics with "Experiences"repeated many times: very surely! Moreover, this is all the transmission of the observation made by this doctor-researcher: ...> which I sometimes talk about here. It is one of the precursors that determined the mechanism of metabolic degeneration for future generations.
But in this case, a human body attacked / stressed by poisons that are put into vaccines and injected directly into human blood should - logically - produce the same effects => either post-allergic or even post-pathogenic or iatrogenic reactions if the subject of the offspring is precociously in contact with said substances (the very principle of degenerative diseases, and we thus discover the boomerang effect of what initially is considered a beneficial preventive measure, or at least "sold" Such as).

This of course if the subjects do not take charge to fight against their "degenerative heritage". Because, nature being generous, it corrects itself (and rather it is, the better it is ...)
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 09/03/12, 17:50

obamot hello
This of course if the subjects do not take charge to fight against their "degenerative heritage". Because, nature being generous, it can be corrected (and the earlier it is, the better ...)
absolutely! a genetic predisposition can be corrected. It only lasts when the following generations adopt a lifestyle, a hygiene, a life close to their ancestors.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 339 guests