France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Exnihiloest » 07/02/19, 19:52

pedrodelavega wrote:Nothing suprising: : Arrowd:
https://www.publicsenat.fr/article/soci ... lot-137727

It's scary:
"21% of French people adhere to at least five conspiracy theories"

Very interesting, by the way, the percentage by category.
Only 9% of those aged 65 and over (The old are smarter, "we can't teach the old monkey to make a face")

27% of people without diploma (studies, it helps)

27% of the voters of Marine Le Pen (we suspected it, not the smart ones).
But at Mélenchon it's worse: 33% to believe in the idea of ​​a Zionist conspiracy, against 22% in the whole population.

And where is the intelligence?
"they are only 10% among the voters of Emmanuel Macron" (and on the right in general, the number is low). : Lol:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 07/02/19, 20:44

Nothing suprising: : Arrowd:
https://www.publicsenat.fr/article/soci ... lot-137727
believe that "the Ministry of Health is in cahoots with the pharmaceutical industry to hide the reality of the harmful effects of vaccines on the general public. "
There are several ways to approach the subject: to make opinion polls that change constantly depending on who will influence the most. Another is to examine the international literature on a particular subject, for example vaccines.
So is the minister in cahoots? In the medical field, there is currently a commitment not to be in conflict of interest with any industry. But a minister is exempt even though he exists. This minister, it has been said (the evil languages ​​obviously, but verifiable) on some media, worked 14 years for these pharmaceutical industries and would have been part of the board of directors of two of them including the French, the world's leading manufacturer of vaccines (75% of the world market!?). Wick? Independent? everyone will judge!
Hide the real public the real harm of vaccines!

Vaccine manufacturers, as with any drug, have the obligation to describe all the side effects of vaccines, from the most innocuous to the most serious. The minister says before the Senate that there are no serious side effects, so the manufacturers are liars and the lawsuits in the US condemning the pharmacy industry to billions of compensation, are only a simple view of the mind (but that was before since since BP has managed to pass a law automatically exonerating all serious side effects,) the theory of conspiracy? From whom?

Very interesting, by the way, the percentage by category.
Only 9% of those aged 65 and over (The old are smarter, "we can't teach the old monkey to make a face")

27% of people without diploma (studies, it helps)
Obviously, except that it is nowhere indicated the level of study of these elderly people and to presuppose that they are necessarily part of those without diplomas, it is the beginning of a fake news, but it is not only a matter of habit. But we can also assume that it is this most educated category (statistically the intellectuals live longer than the working masses (obviously unqualified (sic)) who refuse these vaccines and that changes the situation . " because it is not the old monkeys that we learn to wince!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Exnihiloest » 07/02/19, 21:13

Janic wrote:Nothing suprising: : Arrowd:
https://www.publicsenat.fr/article/soci ... lot-137727

believe that "the Ministry of Health is in cahoots with the pharmaceutical industry to hide the reality of the harmful effects of vaccines on the general public. "
...

The stupidity in the population is indeed at a very advanced stage.
But we console ourselves as we can, 21%? I expected worse.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 08/02/19, 07:35

Janic quoted :
Nothing suprising: : Arrowd:
https://www.publicsenat.fr/article/soci ... lot-137727

believe that "the Ministry of Health is in cahoots with the pharmaceutical industry to hide the reality of the harmful effects of vaccines on the general public. "

...
The stupidity in the population is indeed at a very advanced stage.
for proof you are part of it : Cheesy: and the last straw is that even the "scientists" and the rulers are also part of it. But where are we going? : Cry:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Gébé
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 361
Registration: 08/08/09, 20:02
x 65

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Gébé » 08/02/19, 09:47

While you, like your physical abilities,
Janic wrote:I do not remember having been seized once [*] since these 50 last years ... without vaccines, that's fine! : Cheesy:

[*] nothing else for that matter.

you are endowed with an exceptional intelligence. This is an essential characteristic of conspiracy; finally ... at least, the opinion they have of themselves .....
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 08/02/19, 11:10

While you, like your physical abilities,
janic wrote: I do not remember having been seized once [*] since the last 50 years ... without vaccines, that's fine!

[*] nothing else for that matter.

you are endowed with an exceptional intelligence. This is an essential characteristic of conspiracy; finally ... at least, the opinion they have of themselves .....

In short, you would not be endowed with an exceptional intelligence,?! according to your criteria.

* Now if you want to read what I wrote, " for these last 50 years " clear not before ! Did you understand ?!
But even though you do not have exceptional intelligence, you must be able to understand this simple sentence. And since you're a fan of medicine and biology, you must have learned somewhere, the principle of entropy. So for the record: " Entropy, a measure of disorder
Statistical thermodynamics makes it possible to specify that entropy characterizes the microscopic disorder of a system, its degree of disorganization. The entropy of a system therefore accounts for the degree of dispersion of energy (thermal, chemical, etc.) within the system itself. And according to the second principle of thermodynamics, the energy of an isolated system tends to disperse as much as possible. Its entropy, therefore, tends to increase as well.
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sciences/definitions/physique-entropie-3895/

Clearly in biology, this is called aging and progressive degradation of vital functions ... which has nothing to do with exceptional intelligence, everyone can understand that, and so you too with a little effort.
This aging leads to the increase of various pathologies that everyone can see in ehpad for example.
So I only see that since these 50 last years I have not been seized once without vaccines, it's just a finding, not an index of IQ.

Come on, it's the flu that strikes, violently, people who do not have a sufficient IQ (sic)
"Two caregivers and four residents of an Loiret Ehpad died of the flu in January. Agnès Buzyn confirms on the two caregivers were not vaccinated. According to a first report of Public Health France, the flu has already done some 1100 victims this year. Of which six in a nursing home in Loiret last January, two caregivers and four residents. This Thursday, Agnès Buzyn indicated that the two deceased caregivers were not vaccinated against the virus. "On the other hand, some elderly people were, but we know that among people who are very ... » https://www.egora.fr/actus-pro/societe/ ... s-vaccines
Except that if two were not vaccinated 4 others were and statistically it represents 66% of victims vaccinated against only 33% unvaccinated and according to this logic better not to be vaccinated ... NO?
In addition, the term victim includes either people with flu-like symptoms only, or hospitalized people, or deaths. Where are these?
See the Epidemiological Bulletin Public Health Influenza France, precisely and, I repeat, how, (with only 10.000.000 of flu vaccine vaccines with a few vaccine viruses, very little protective), can we vaccinate 67.000.000 resident residents in France, plus the millions of visitors from all over the world?
A logical and coherent answer, even without exceptional IQ) would be welcome, of course!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 08/02/19, 12:47

How many people actually die of the flu?
By Journalist Figaro Cécile Thibert Updated 23 / 01 / 2017 to 15: 32 Posted on 17 / 01 / 2017 to 19: 20
Influenza: Why are hospitals energized?
Damien Mascret, a journalist at Figaro Santé, talks about the press conference given by Marisol Touraine on Wednesday morning when France as a whole is affected by an epidemic of influenza.

VIDEOS - Varied figures are circulating, but it is actually impossible to accurately estimate the number of virus victims.

The flu, which appears everywhere at the beginning of the year, may have no more secrets for you. But for epidemiologists, responsible for establishing the funeral accounts of the victims of the virus, it remains a real headache. "Each epidemic sees the most extravagant mortality figures that vary from 1 to 15, so much so that even our Minister of Health no longer dares to quote", Says on his blog the general practitioner Jean-Baptiste Blanc. He tries to understand why the media relentlessly repeat the figure of 18.300 additional deaths counted during winter 2014-2015, while the National Public Health Agency France estimates 9000 the number of annual deaths due to influenza identified between 2000 and 2010 and the Center for Epidemiology on Medical Causes of Death (CépiDc) brandished one of ... 431 flu deaths on average every year!

"In reality, these figures all make sense but they do not correspond to the same thing," says Daniel Lévy-Bruhl, head of respiratory infections and vaccination unit at Public Health France. The 18 300 figure corresponds to the excess mortality observed during winter 2014-2015, mainly related to influenza but also "to other winter factors" (increased cardiovascular risk, presence of other viruses ... ), states the balance sheet of May 2015. That of 9000 dead, him, is an average estimate of the excess excess mortality related to the flu. "These two data are not incompatible. One is an observation in a given year, the other is an average, says Daniel Lévy-Bruhl, co-author of the report of Public Health France from which these figures are derived. The difference of the double can be explained by the fact that there are years without excess mortality, as was the case in 2016. "


And then there are the 431 deaths recorded by CépiDc, a laboratory of Inserm responsible for drawing up each year the statistics of medical causes of death. To obtain this figure, researchers count death certificates completed by doctors mentioning influenza as the cause of death. How then to explain that, on the 9 000 additional annual deaths related to influenza estimated by Public Health France, only 431, ie 5%, have been identified as such by CépiDc?

Death indirectly related to the virus
«Influenza is hardly ever the immediate cause of death. Very often, doctors do not even know that the deceased was carrying the virus, which is why it is not written on the certificate ", explains Pierre-Yves Boëlle, biostatistician and professor in epidemiology at Pierre University and Marie-Curie (Paris). "In the elderly affected by influenza, the majority of deaths occur late compared to influenza infection, either because bacteria take advantage of the weakness of the patient to over-infect, or as a result of decompensations related to precarious general state. In this case, the flu is often not mentioned on the death certificate, "adds Daniel Lévy-Bruhl. This careful accounting can only result in a gross underestimation of the mortality due to influenza.

Conversely, the figure of 18 300 is the result of an overestimation. How was it calculated? "In the absence of an epidemic, the mortality curve follows a periodic movement, which includes a winter peak. Based on this model, all additional deaths that occur during an influenza epidemic are attributed to influenza, explains Boëlle. Certainly, there are methodological biases and significant differences between the data. But this is the best statistical estimate that we currently have. "An approach that has been adopted by all European countries.

The epidemiological fog surrounding the number of deaths attributable to the virus also asks the number of deaths averted by the vaccine, estimated at 2 500 per year, by Santé Publique France. "We do not have good evidence today that vaccination reduces mortality in the elderly, however it avoids infections, so beforehand deaths, "emphasizes Professor Boëlle.
http://sante.lefigaro.fr/article/combie ... a-grippe-/
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by izentrop » 12/02/19, 14:06

Here we are like Don Quixote fighting against windmills. http://www.slate.fr/story/173328/peur-v ... s-emotions Uh! no, a windmill here : Mrgreen:
In 2018, seventeen epidemics (defined by the presence of at least three cases) were reported across the United States. The situation is even worse in Europe: 41.000 cases have been reported during the first six months of 2018, with at least thirty-seven deaths.

And just as predictably, it is the frustration with these epidemics and the enormous costs they impose on communities that are growing, as none of this would have happened if more children had been vaccinated. Article after article, we are indignant at the problem by explaining the safety of measles vaccination and what collective immunity means. Calls to reason conspire "irrationality", "denial of science" and "madness" of anti-vaccines. At first glance they seem logical, but in their own way, these summons are as unreasonable as they deny the evidence of this eternal return, namely that the problem goes beyond reason and the factual.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 12/02/19, 15:59

Clearly, for you, the INSERM, the cepidc only tell bullshit. And of course the CDC also

MMR vaccine: recent expansion by the US CDC of contraindications to its administration

One of our medical readers - whom we thank - was kind enough to send us the following important information: the American CDC, whose troubled links with the pharmas and with the vaccine ideology are well known (see, in particular, the documentary Vaxxed) has therefore modified and expanded, in an update of 12 last February, the list of contraindications to measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which now also include: a history of immune problems in a parent or in the brothers.

This therefore includes a potentially very large number of diseases with immune or autoimmune components: multiple sclerosis, type I diabetes, lupus, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, celiac disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, autism , periarteritis nodosa (PAN), PANDAS, asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, vitiligo, psoriasis, .... in other words, a huge number of concerned people and children, the vaccine building really crumbling on all sides ....

Among the serious risks (other than autoimmune and immune) for vaccinees, the CDC page mentions "deafness, long-term seizures, coma, loss of consciousness, and brain damage" even though they believe that "receiving the MMR vaccine is much safer than catching measles, mumps or rubella" (which obviously remains all the more to prove after watching the documentary Vaxxed, which showed how much this body has already covered a glaring fraud about this same MMR vaccine, consisting in concealing an exorbitant excess risk of autism, especially for African-American children vaccinated ...)

http://initiativecitoyenne.be/2018/12/v ... ation.html
Nothing to do with these:
https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/vaccines/53-priorix
Contraindications
Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients or to neomycin. A history of neomycin contact dermatitis is not a contraindication. For hypersensitivity reactions related to egg proteins, see section "Warnings and precautions for use".

Severe deficiency of humoral or cellular immunity (primary or acquired), for example severe combined immunodeficiency, agammaglobulinemia and AIDS or symptomatic infection due to HIV or with age-dependent CD4 + T cell count in children under 12 months : CD4 + <25%; children from 12 to 35 months: CD4 + <20%; children from 36 to 59 months: CD4 + <15% (see section "Warnings and precautions for use").

Pregnancy. In addition, pregnancy should be avoided in the month following vaccination (see section "Pregnancy").

As with other vaccines, PRIORIX should be delayed in subjects with acute severe febrile illness. A mild infection, such as a cold, should not result in delayed immunization.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 15/02/19, 08:26

https://aimsib.org/2018/09/30/gardasil- ... -approche/
Gardasil ©, the catastrophe is approaching
by Dr. Vincent Reliquet, Dr. Michel deLorgeril | 30 Sep 2018 | 58 comments

Gardasil ©, the catastrophe is approaching
This anti-papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) is sold since 2006 in France with an indication that was dreaming, prevent the occurrence of 70% of female genital cancers (cervix, vagina, vulva) and some cancers of the anal canal. Some countries have invested a lot of money and all their epidemiological credibility in a wild vaccination, what will they soon get from 12 years of anti-HPV vaccine? That of an unprecedented scandal. Explanations in twelve points.

1- Pathogenicity of papillomavirus or HPV
These DNA viruses belong to the family Papillomaviridae. There would be about 200 genotypes, not all genetically yet decoded, unequal potential harmfulness but the most feared currently in Europe is represented by the 16 type, possibly causing cervical cancer in two. The other types of oncogenic viruses currently causing problems in Europe are represented by HPV18 (20% of cases) and much less often HPV31, HPV33 and HPV35, the latter not even being part of the strains included in the new vaccine called Gardasil © 9. (1)

It is known that vaccination against pathogens may give rise to an explosion of new serotypes not combated by this vaccine. This is a sadly common phenomenon called "replacement" or "substitution".

These viruses, before producing a true invasive adenocarcinoma cancer, can generate precancerous lesions of variable evolutionary potential. (2) It should be understood that regardless of the stage of cervical lesions, the probability of spontaneous cures remains high for a long time, as shown in the table below:


In: Epidemiological Data on Cervical Cancer, InVS




It should be noted that 1% of CIN1 only will evolve towards an invasive cancer.

2- Vaccination by Gardasil ©, what are the objectives?
To essentially reduce morbidity (number of cases) and mortality (number of fatal cases) by cervical cancer. A first assembly called Gardasil © containing the antigens of the four serotypes 6, II, 16 and 18 was put on the market in 2006 then a second vaccine was born in June 2015 called Gardasil © 9 (see below).

In fact, 95% of global cases of cervical cancer occur in women living in developing countries. (3) The use of both male and female condoms allows for a very clear reduction in HPV infections, as well as a reduction in the age of first sexual intercourse, a decrease in the number of partners, a correction various micronutritional deficiencies and an interruption of smoking. (4)

For French women, on the other hand, the incidence of cervical cancer has only been decreasing for over a hundred years. 3,6% for women born in 1910 it fell to ... 0,6% for those born in 1950. (3) No doubt it is due mainly to the practice of cervico-vaginal smear, nevertheless still insufficiently realized.



3- Gardasil ©, who makes it, who sells it?
The manufacturing is assumed by the American industrial Merck, after redemption of the license initially held by the National Institute of the American Health (NHI). Each sale of Gardasil © therefore includes a retrocession to the US State (5) Merck is at the origin of the Vioxx scandal in the early 2000 years. This firm camouflaged the existence of thousands of deaths using its anti-inflammatory to sustain the global benefits that ensued. Merck will prefer to compromise financially with US plaintiffs to avoid lawsuits in the US and elsewhere.

The final marketing of Gardasil © in France is delegated to a conglomerate associating Merck and Sanofi-Pasteur.

4- Gardasil © 9, what does it contain?
This vaccine is adjuvanted with 0,5mg of amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate per dose, a dose more than doubled compared to its predecessor Gardasil ©. As we will see, no pharmacokinetic study has been conducted for all the constituents of this vaccine, neither for this overdose salt, but for all the other components of this assembly.


Gardasil © 9, composition

The total amount of antigens is more than doubled compared to its predecessor, from 120mcg to 270mcg per dose.
Polysorbate 80 (or Tween 80 or E433) is regularly reported as a harmful and carcinogenic, reprotoxic and foetotoxic product. (6)
Sodium borate (Borax) is classified as toxic for reproduction (category 1B) by European Regulation No. 1272 / 2008 and, as such, is labeled with the following statement which must be clearly marked on the packaging: "H360: May affect fertility and the fetus. In addition the European regulation 1907 / 2006 says REACH prohibits the sale to the general public of chemicals classified 1A and 1B ". (7)
Gardasil © 9 has been approved by the FDA without further study, while dosages of aluminum salts and antigens have been doubled.
The Gardasil © 9, naturally more expensive than the previous "4" brings no additional prophylactic interest compared to Gardasil © since the ANSM has classified the replacement product at its lowest rank, ASMR5 either: Not present. (8)
5- Gardasil ©, what prior studies before placing on the market
Vaccines are exempt from all evaluations of their carcinogenic, genotoxic and mutagenic effects. The Gardasil © were no exception to this rule, while this genital tropism vaccine contains two molecules highly suspicious of being able to generate pathologies of this type.

The level of research done by Merck around the possible side effects of Gardasil © is therefore appalling, as evidenced by the monograph Merck Canada (9). The side effects would have been studied only on the 14 days following the injections:


Merck Canada, excerpt



Preliminary studies carried out before placing on the market seemed reassuring as wanted to testify a French working group in 2011, "The vaccine Gardasil® and the strategy of global prevention of cervical cancers" (10) and which announced between others this, full of naive confidence:


CTV-CSHPF 2007 review, excerpt

This is not the case, as usual Merck has misused its ethical obligation to test its vaccine against a perfectly inert placebo by substituting in at least two studies ... a product containing aluminum hydroxide while this molecule is also contained in Gardasil ©. If Merck were to consider aluminum salts as a product with no adverse health consequences, then why incorporate it into its placebo? (11)

Just as if we wanted to test the safety of a curare product by testing it against a placebo that also contains it, it will be shamefully easy then to announce that the product is not more toxic than placebo.

The joke lasted for years before the international scientific community became involved, which did not prevent the Gardasil ©'s career from continuing inexorably.

Recently, a member of the British Medical Journal obtained by judicial compulsion from the Canadian authorities the right to consult confidential clinical studies prior to the marketing of this vaccine, suspecting serious irregularities. Let's wait for more.

6- Gardasil ©, establishment of a global fast-track
Merck has managed to convince the highest authorities that a public health hazard around HPV should allow an accelerated procedure for placing on the market before all safety studies are completed (Fast Track). What will also happen to France in 2006 when the Minister of Health of the time will bypass all national assessment processes to impose the hasty exit of this vaccine. (12)

In fact, Merck will surely try to justify one day the sloppy level of their preliminary work by accusing states of having forced them to disseminate this vaccine before complete closure of toxicity studies.

It should be noted that Merck has not yet produced a single document attesting to the validity of the relevance of this fast-track. We understand that nothing justified it and that Merck has simply fooled all the government agencies in charge of health as well as WHO.

7- Gardasil, what long-term monitoring?
This vaccine is on the French list of drugs with enhanced surveillance since its launch and yet our agencies persist in noticing anything particular. (13)

Vaccine side effects are reported by physicians only in 1 at 10% of cases. (4) Despite this appalling under-reporting, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is criticized in 2017 by Pr P. Götzsche (Cochrane collaboration) for failing to investigate suspicions of concealment of adverse effects by the Merck Group. The story would repeat itself? Think about Vioxx ... (14)

To date and given the frequency of accidents that this vaccine seems to generate, some countries have already revised their vaccine recommendations for this product, including Japan and Austria, which do not recommend it anymore than still allowing it to sale.

8- Gardasil ©, side effects on reproduction
The official thesis advocated by Merck is clear, the vaccine does not affect the progress of pregnancy: (15)


mesvaccins.net, excerpt

The ANSM also persisted until recently in not wanting to detect anything on this point (16), yet from all parts of the world flocked for years testimonies of a real impact on reproduction, collected in a very complete article signed by Senta Depuyt. (5)

Early menopause, triple cases of miscarriages (17), testicular and ovarian degeneration, various fetopathies, oligospermia, the list is not exhaustive, the reports are numerous especially in the USA, and yet nothing seems to move inside. government agencies.

As expected, developing a genital tropism vaccine by combining two genotoxic products and choosing to never study genotoxic and reprotoxic potential could only lead to these complications.

9- Gardasil ©, general side effects
Merck has acknowledged the existence of very many adverse effects: (18) Injection site pain, headache, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, lymphadenopathy, hypersensitivity reactions, disseminated acute encephalomyelitis, vertigo, Guillain-Barré, syncope, nausea, vomiting, arthro-myalgia, bruising, pruritus, asthenia, chills, discomfort.

On the other hand most of the serious undesirable effects are rejected such as the appearance of multiple sclerosis, of severe encephalopathies, of various dysimmunitary syndromes and naturally of all the deaths.

When the French Agency for Sanitary Safety and Health Products (AFSSAPS) counted 351 French victims of serious adverse effects (SAEs) in 2011, it then calculated an incidence rate equal to 8,1 case for 100 000 vaccinations (19) Compared to the National Cancer Institute (Inca) cancer incidence rate of cervical cancer, which is 6,4 for 100 000 women (2010 figures) force is to note that Gardasil induces 30 % more EIG than the cancers it is supposed to prevent.

10- Gardasil ©, its medium-term therapeutic results
In a recent highly researched article (20), Dr. Gérard Delépine, a French cancer surgeon, has taken the epidemiological results of the countries that have used this vaccine extensively for about ten years. It is recalled that the natural evolution of cervical cancer occurs on 20 30 years and therefore no consequence should have emerged in 2018 ...

But in all the countries that have vaccinated their young girls significantly (Australia, Great Britain, Sweden, Norway, USA), the incidence rates of cervical cancer of vaccinated young women are increasing, while older women unvaccinated or poorly vaccinated-for example, French women-continue to show a steady decrease in the incidence of this disease.

Gardasil © therefore appears to be associated with increased cervical cancer in at least some of the vaccinated female populations.



11- Gardasil © a mandatory vaccine for both sexes
This idea is defended in France by many infectiologists generally very closely related to the pharmaceutical industry, first and foremost Professor Alain Fisher, an immuno-pediatrician who organized the citizen consultation on the eleven-valence immunization obligation, adopted despite the contrary opinion of the jury of health professionals who had advocated the exact opposite.

A group of eight MPs from our National Assembly tabled a bill on 27 June 2018 to add a Gardasil © 11 vaccines required. (21) One can only be dismayed ... Who are these Deputies, where do their skills in oncology and infectiology come from?

Laure de LA RAUDIÈRE, ex France Telecom, Agnès FIRMIN LE BODO, former pharmacist, Pierre MOREL-À-L'HUISSIER, lawyer, Vincent LEDOUX, historian, Antoine HERTH, farmer, Charles de COURSON, ex-magistrate, Christophe NAEGELEN, trader and Meyer HABIB, an engineer specializing in jewelery!


Bill of Rights, AN 27 / 06 / 2018



The answer is probably negative, hence these questions: Why did they sign this text, who actually wrote it?

12- Conclusions
Gardasil © vaccines have been extremely poorly evaluated from the start by the FDA. The initial fast-track process will allow Merck Sanofi-Pasteur to finally blame the government agencies when the adverse effects of these vaccines become evident. This vaccine has been prescribed too broadly without worrying about an already started sexual activity or even a near or already started pregnancy, which partly explains the consequences recorded in the countries which made it a priority of public health. Vaccine useless and very expensive (500 euro per child for three doses by counting the medical expenses) it became useless, very expensive and a harmfulness largely superior to the cancer which it was supposed to stop while generating serious side effects.

We therefore call on all our readers to seize all the possible solutions in order to alert political decision-makers, journalists, learned societies, the medical community, all national and supra-national health agencies, so that an immediate suspension of the use of Gardasil © intervenes concomitantly with the development of all the judicial and sanitary investigations necessary to the manifestation of the truth, whatever it costs.





Sources and references:
(1) J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Jun 7; 87 (11): 796-802.
(2) histological lesions, cervix
- ADC: invasive adenocarcinoma
- AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ
- EC: invasive squamous cell carcinoma
- CIN1 (Mild Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia): Cervical neoplasia
intraepithelial grade 1, also called low grade
- 2 CIN (Moderate Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia): neoplasia
intraepithelial cervical 2, also known as grade
Intermediate (often grouped with 3 CIN)
- 3 CIN (Severe Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia): Neoplasia
intraepithelial cervical 3, also called high grade;
this lesion can not be dissociated from squamous cell carcinoma in situ
- CIN 2-3: high-grade intraepithelial cervical lesions (group
CIN 2 and 3)
(3) Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, et al. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. IX. IARC Scientific publications
No.160. Lyon, 2007.
(4) "Vaccinations, Unwanted Truths", Georget M. Dangles Ed. 2018
(5) "Gardasil, how many virgins sacrificed on the altar of vaccination" Depuyt S., Nexus Sept-Oct 2018
(6) http://www.additifs-alimentaires.net/E433.php
(7) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bora
(8) http://base-donnees-publique.medicament ... d=65017887
(9) http://www.merck.ca/static/pdf/GARDASIL_9-PM_F.pdf
(10) https://aimsib.org/wp-content/uploads/2 ... rdasil.pdf
(11) http://docteurdu16.blogspot.com/search? ... -date=true
"This was the case in the clinical trials of the vaccine Gardasil, HPV vaccine. Following the FUTUR I and II clinical trials, the MSD laboratory (Merck, USA) proclaimed that the vaccine was "safe" because it did not cause more adverse effects than placebo. But it turned out that the laboratory had benefited from a loophole in the regulation and the fact that the composition of the placebo was not clearly defined by regulation. He had therefore used as a placebo in the control group a product containing aluminum hydroxide, which is the adjuvant of the vaccine. Used for its pro-inflammatory properties (generating inflammation), aluminum hydroxide is suspected to be at the root of some of the adverse effects observed with vaccines containing it. The placebo composition used for the control group was not clearly advertised in the few 400 report pages submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of the vaccine. This had not alerted the members of the commission to decide on it. For years the laboratory could claim with impunity that Gardasil was safe, since it had no more adverse effects than a placebo. It was not the regulatory agencies, but people who carried out independent research who discovered the pot to the roses.
(12) The service of Mr Xavier Bertrand has been contacted by us the 17 / 09 / 2018 in preparation for this article but no answer was made to us at 30 / 09 / 2018.
(13) https://ansm.sante.fr/Activites/Surveil ... s-risques/
(14) http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2 ... _3244.html
(15) https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/vaccines/7-gardasil
(16) https://ansm.sante.fr/Activites/Surveil ... s-risques/
(17) https://sanevax.org/fda-approved-gardas ... stupidity/
(18) https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/vaccines/7-gardasil
(19) http://www.lepoint.fr/sante/cancer-du-c ... tor=EPR-6-[Daily Newsletter] -20111025
(20) https://www.agoravox.fr/tribune-libre/a ... sil-206898
(21) http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/15/pr ... on1118.asp
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Google [Bot] and 204 guests