France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

[Janic]

Christophe could confirm or deny who owns the IP addresses. After that, if this is really the case, a ban for life would be necessary ...

yes, but how many PIs can a single individual have?

[ABC2019]

by GuyGadeboisLeRetour »11/03/21, 19:48

ABC2019 wrote:
at least that proves that we are not the same person

That's not really what it proves ...

It proves that if I answer two phones, every time I can pretend I'm not the other.
now, except absolute mimicry, the formulations, the lies, the quibbles of defense and accusation are, not similar, but absolutely identical. so pedro IS abc!

so if you're right, the "I prefer not" wouldn't mean anything other than I'm trying to confuse you ....

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Christophe could confirm or deny who owns the IP addresses. After that, if this is really the case, a ban for life would be necessary ...

yes, but how many PIs can a single individual have?

In general, with the "boxes" the IP is fixed.

[ABC2019]

so pedro IS abc!

Christophe could confirm or deny who owns the IP addresses. After that, if this is really the case, a ban for life would be necessary ...

and if they are not the same, a lifetime ban on those who peddled these defamations would not be bad either

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

so if you're right, the "I prefer not" would mean nothing other than I'm trying to confuse you ...

Your specialty.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

and if they are not the same, a lifetime ban on those who peddled these defamations would not be bad either

No. Everyone can make mistakes.

[ABC2019]

and if they are not the same, a lifetime ban on those who peddled these defamations would not be bad either

No. Everyone can make mistakes.

To assert things without proof is not to be mistaken, it is defamation. If you don't know, you don't assert.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

and if they are not the same, a lifetime ban on those who peddled these defamations would not be bad either

No. Everyone can make mistakes.

To assert things without proof is not to be mistaken, it is defamation. If you don't know, you don't assert.

Blah, blah ... an apology is enough. On the other hand, if it is true: You release.

[Janic]

a B C

To assert things without proof is not to be mistaken, it is defamation. If you don't know, you don't assert.

and paf, he does not miss any so rebelotte: when you say that the H are charlatans, it is: To assert things without proof is not to be mistaken, it is defamation. If you don't know, you don't assert.Ditto for crook!

[ABC2019]

a B C

To assert things without proof is not to be mistaken, it is defamation. If you don't know, you don't assert.

and paf, he does not miss any so rebelotte: when you say that the H are charlatans, it is: To assert things without proof is not to be mistaken, it is defamation. If you don't know, you don't assert.Ditto for crook!

Aren't you a little bit obsessive by any chance?