Parkinson's disease favored by pesticides, it's official

[izentrop]

Since you are looking for the little beast with arguments of authority.

Opinion of the National Academies of Agriculture, Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, Technologies, and Veterinary on the recent publication of GE Séralini et al. on the toxicity of a GMO
from the conclusion:

... the magazine that, we said, should never have accepted this article, which is serious
because the journal's expertise of the article is an initial peer review. The
second responsibility is that of GE Séralini to have orchestrated in advance an over-
mediatization from questionable results providing no proof.

This publication "Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize" by Séralini et al. was withdrawn from the journal Food and chemical toxicology on November 28, 2013, as reported by journal editor A. Wallace Hayes. The latter indicated that although there was "no fraud or misinterpretation of the data" and that "when the study was reviewed after publication by a panel of experts, the author agreed to provide all the data requested, and that he was very cooperative throughout the review process "," the results presented, if they are not incorrect, do not allow a conclusion ". The authors are criticized for the variety of rats used and the number of rats per group (10 of each sex for each product tested). To read the full announcement of the withdrawal of this publication, click here.

source cancer environment
For fans of all rotten, I certainly lost my time, but I hope that is not the case for everyone.
Otherwise, I have nothing to do here.

[Obamot]

1) Pure trollism, the arguments of authority are you who use and abuse in this forum for ages, and that's something I've been talking about since the beginning, you've even been moderate for that!

2) Moreover, you had no training in the medical field or in chemistry to do this.

3) Finally, you do not respond to the loyal arguments against you.

[izentrop]

Fair arguments

The High Council of Biotechnologies (HCB) is notoriously considered to be pro-GMO >>>

... by a commercial site pfff!

► View Text

no nothing

[Obamot]

It's not about that, but the central point where it was opposed to you the HCB which is your own source, contradicts your theory.

As usual, you only repeat the words you think are convenient to contradict, ignoring the background.

► View Text

It is a pity that soon after you want to give lessons about the "loyalty" of the words of others, when yours are generally null in the matter on both objectivity and substance. (when you go crazy or talk about subjects where you obviously don't know anything about it. As already said many times, instead of being "pro-establishment at all costs", take care of your business, there are many technical areas where you probably excel ...?)

[Janic]

cancer-environnement.fr We can also trust their competence and their rigor.

Editorial Board members declare no conflict of interest FINANCIAL with the pharmaceutical industry or laboratory or manufacturer of products or medical devices. the interests are not exclusively financial! There are those of career interest, notoriety, presence at other committees, etc ...

Janic wrote:
his work must be confirmed or reversed over a long experimental period

That was not the case.

according to the study: yes! Since done over two years that corresponds to the average life of experimental rats. Caution should be especially related to the fact that between lab animals and humans in their own environment and its diversification, the nuance can be large, but wait 70 years to know if this or that product is harmful and to what extent ? the past has shown that, until it can no longer be challenged by industrialists, hundreds, thousands of victims will have died early: reminder for DDT, asbestos, amaranth, etc ...

[izentrop]

That all the scientific community of the medical field refutes is not enough for you, stay with your certainties then. Everything was said.

[Obamot]

Just not because it's just the opposite

No offense to the chemical pro ...

The link between Parkinson's disease and officially recognized pesticides

http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2 ... _3244.html

Source Christophe:
Health-pollution-prevention / health de-Parkinson-favored-by-the-pesticide-c-is-official-t14835.html # p306587

[Obamot]

Tamagotchi continues
No more freedom of expression?
Soon the end of forum ?

► View Text

What revenge after being fired several times! Will he succeed in "blowing up" the forum after a hatred that he has been dragging for years?

Clearly a personal attack against the ideas and against the person who defends his ideas.
Pathetic.

[Janic]

That all the scientific community of the medical field refutes is not enough for you, stay with your certainties then. Everything was said.

once again, we should not confuse ONE PART of the medical community and ALL of the medical community. With the hindsight of history, many affirmative scientific "circles" have gone wrong.

[izentrop]

In this case, it is the majority of disciplines that write and sign it. It is indisputable.