The word "lost" used by "the owl man" is pernicious and shows the desire to make data stick to its certainties.Christophe wrote:No on the basis of banana geodes ... whose public data is not the same as that of the report ... which nevertheless indicated to take its data on geodis ...
Do you sometimes read other people's ideas? I invite you to look urgently: society-and-philosophy / how-i-try-to-improve-my-judgment-thanks-to-julia-galef-et-a-flus-t16951.html
For the rest your answer is lousy ... we are used to it ...
In reality there is always data which is not retained in a serious study, there are still some which do their job correctly.
Now, that may not match today's reality, it is that "our" virus is capricious.
Note that most people fully vaccinated and yet died from Covid-19 were elderly (70 years or older).
The study also looks at the proportion of patients infected with the delta variant. On the other hand, "taking into account the very low numbers of hospitalized patients who were affected by the virus presenting the L452R mutation over the period, the analysis of their vaccination status does not allow to conclude to a protective effect of the vaccination against -vis the infection significantly different for this particular mutation, "says Drees. https://www.dna.fr/sante/2021/07/30/cov ... alisations
