In Silicon Valley, birth of an ecological conscience?

Current Economy and Sustainable Development-compatible? GDP growth (at all costs), economic development, inflation ... How concillier the current economy with the environment and sustainable development.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79364
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060

In Silicon Valley, birth of an ecological conscience?




by Christophe » 23/08/06, 21:24

The econothon (or almost) already exists in the USA ...

For those who feel concerned, Americans now have the opportunity to buy - cheaply? - an "eco" conscience. Thanks to the ingenuity of a start-up from Silicon Valley, Terrapass, which offers its citizens to buy a "green tag", which can cost up to 125 dollars a year. The start-up uses the money raised to invest in the production of clean energy: wind turbines, solar panels, etc ... Terrapass has already sold 3 000 labels, one-third to Californians. All the testimonies of the adepts agree: it is a kind of tax they voluntarily pay to mitigate the pollution they generate, mainly driving their car.

And the moment begins to become multiform. So another organization, not-for-profit that one, pushed the same logic even further. DriveNeutral offers a system that allows everyone to calculate the pollution of their vehicle. Thanks to clever equations detailed on its website, every motorist has the possibility to quantify in dollar the "cost" of his own pollution in greenhouse gases. The guilty motorist then sends the corresponding amount to DriveNeutral who uses it to buy, roughly, rights to pollute on the Chicago Climate Exchange. This private market has been opened voluntarily ("thanks" to George Bush, the United States is not a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol) to allow American companies to participate in this haggling, which in theory only concerns the signatory countries of the United States. famous protocol.

And indeed, the phenomenon concerns more and more American companies, listening to a public opinion that is changing. Thus, Starbucks, the famous American coffee brand that owns nearly 10 000 establishments worldwide, has chosen to now buy 20% of its energy from renewable sources of energy. A well-understood interest: these firms operate in a globalized world where many of their competitors must already take into account the ecological factor. They anticipate.


source: http://www.enviedentreprendre.com/2006/ ... licon.html
0 x
User avatar
nonoLeRobot
Master Kyot'Home
Master Kyot'Home
posts: 790
Registration: 19/01/05, 23:55
Location: Beaune 21 / Paris
x 13




by nonoLeRobot » 23/08/06, 23:19

If the calculations are complicated to see the pollution from their car, I do not see why they are not simply applying a coefficient to their fuel consumption or not paying a percentage of their fuel expenditure. I hope that the good conscience does not make them waste anything beside, at last a pseudo voluntary tax, it is already not bad.
0 x
freddau
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 641
Registration: 19/09/05, 20:08
x 1




by freddau » 24/08/06, 09:02

Yes,

it's a start but given the infrastructure they have put in place (roadway) etc ... it will be very hard to do without the car down.

As much as we do
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79364
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060




by Christophe » 24/08/06, 10:15

nonoLeRobot wrote:If the calculations are complicated to see the pollution from their car, I do not see why they are not simply applying a coefficient to their fuel consumption or not paying a percentage of their fuel expenditure. I hope that the good conscience does not make them waste anything beside, at last a pseudo voluntary tax, it is already not bad.


Well your comment would be good if everyone used the same catalyzed recent vehicle (assuming it does not reject anything else than the CO2 ... which is not necessarily true) ....

The fact is that there are other polluting gases directly (Nox, HC, CO, COv, PAH ...) or indirectly (CO, COv ...) contributing to pollution (so I guess it's them which are estimated according to the type and the age of the vehicle) which can contribute to the greenhouse effect ...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79364
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060




by Christophe » 24/08/06, 10:17

freddau wrote:Yes,

it's a start but given the infrastructure they have put in place (roadway) etc ... it will be very hard to do without the car down.

As much as we do


For many years now, California has been putting an "econological" policy in place. Thus, certain highways are forbidden at certain hours for "solitary" drivers .... which has the effect of favoring carpooling. ...
0 x
denis
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 944
Registration: 15/12/05, 17:26
Location: rhone alps
x 2




by denis » 31/08/06, 19:23

Christophe wrote:
freddau wrote:Yes,

it's a start but given the infrastructure they have put in place (roadway) etc ... it will be very hard to do without the car down.

As much as we do


For many years now, California has been putting an "econological" policy in place. Thus, certain highways are forbidden at certain hours for "solitary" drivers .... which has the effect of favoring carpooling. ...


that's when we see that on the French farsome ?? : Mrgreen:
draft laws?
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Economy and finance, sustainability, growth, GDP, ecological tax systems"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Forhorse and 334 guests