Aid to companies and counterparties?

Current Economy and Sustainable Development-compatible? GDP growth (at all costs), economic development, inflation ... How concillier the current economy with the environment and sustainable development.
User avatar
chatelot16
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6960
Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
Location: Angouleme
x 264

Aid to companies and counterparties?




by chatelot16 » 03/03/14, 03:56

Hello

the nonsense continues! our dear president want to demand compensation to help business?

he did not find more complicated? is that the simplification shock?

the solution is nevertheless mathematically simple! it is necessary to move charges or taxes to favor the companies which hire and penalize those which are content to earn money with localized activity: automatic counterparty!

reduction of state expenditure to reduce charges, it is impossible in the short term! whatever the effort it will make the effect too late

shifting loads to push companies the right way can be done quickly with constant total charge

the disease being serious it takes a dose of horse: massive reduction of social charges levied on the wages ... also massive increase of other tax to keep the balance

business leaders know how to count: each time they study a project if there is a choice to make between manufacturing in France or buying everything done elsewhere the price of labor tilts in the wrong direction

an aid and counterpart gas factory will not serve any purpose: entrepreneurs will not believe it ... like the CICE tax credit job competitiveness, too complicated for small businesses to benefit from it

a real load shift will not revive overnight the television or computer manufacturer since these activities have disappeared: but the new activity to be built, such as wind, photovoltaic, methanization, cogeneration, biomass ... it takes a lot of work, and it's not progressing because the labor is too expensive

it takes a big change to unlock the situation!

a displacement of the loads would have an effect immediately calculable by any entrepreneur who has a project ... by any entrepreneur who studied a project and found an insufficient result to start with: a massive displacement of the loads would immediately restart any kind of project

oddly the unions have always opposed the shifting of social charges on a different base than wages, as if it would make them lose control of I don't know what: it's stupid and suicidal

sarko was a little on the way with his social VAT, but made the mistake of presenting the VAT increase first without clearly specifying what reduction in charge there would be

there must be a radical solution: completely suppress the social charges: that everyone sees the change in salary, that all the entrepreneurs see the reduction in charges ... and that everyone appreciates the less paperwork

there would no longer be a difference between moonlighting and normal work

and of course to balance there would be an increase in vat, income tax, business tax, but which do not depend on the number of employees

we currently do not have a lot of industry capable of exporting: a change in the price of labor will not overnight make it possible to sell to the 4 corner of the world, but will allow overnight to reduce what 'we buy abroad, preferring to repair what we have with the craftsmen we have whose prices will drop a big blow with this drop in load

this drop in load will lower the prices of all the study work, and relaunch all the projects

payroll taxes are a stupid brake

the new president has been there for 2 years and doesn't know what to do: it's the last moment to get an idea: it will soon be too late
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79136
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10975




by Christophe » 03/03/14, 21:23

Good subject.

To complete, I came across this good article: the funny recovery ...

Http://www.regards.fr/web/la-drole-de-reprise,7522
0 x
User avatar
chatelot16
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6960
Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
Location: Angouleme
x 264




by chatelot16 » 03/03/14, 22:56

there is another big criticism to make on the current idea, which nevertheless shows a solution

they all want to reduce public spending ... to reduce taxes ... and boost the economy ... process so slow that we will all be dead before

the state is there the civil servants are there, if we put them in unemployment it will not save much ... it will be necessary on the one hand to pay them as unemployed, and on the other hand to give the work he was doing to private companies

the solution is to put civil servants at the service of society with the objective of efficiency and general interest ... not the objective of compliance with regulations and stupid standards

the drire (or dreal or I don't know what, I can't keep up with their name change) must be at the service of companies to give them all the means to work better while avoiding danger and pollution, and not just be gendarme distributing punishment without knowing the solutions

the great shock of simplification must remove a multitude of administrative tasks, and to avoid the fear of putting unemployed civil servants who have become useless, they must be put at the service of companies for the sharing of available resources

afnor standards must be available free of charge to everyone: it is in the public interest!

we have researchers who seek, and even who find, but the volume of information is so huge and so poorly available that we forget faster than we find ...
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Economy and finance, sustainability, growth, GDP, ecological tax systems"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 137 guests