Ahmed wrote:Obamot, you write:
the current situation is a model "economic", or anti-economic in the long run (and even now), since we are in the process of eating our capital of natural resources at great speed "V"
I agree on the substance, but not on the form: the model is indeed "economic", in the sense that it functions in the direction of the interest of the system, but obviously not in ours. The limit of natural resources only represents the external contradiction of the system ...
My modest neologism "
æconomique"is taken from the idea of"
the oecumene"which seeks precisely to claim the denunciation of the confiscation of economic means which - part of tradition and their origin, had to serve humanity as a" tool "of development - rather than being to arrive at what some come"
to use it"as a new means of drawing profits from abstract values part pure lucre (another" original sin ", but that of the Protestant bankers this time undoubtedly?) the idea being to federate informally
opponents the current speculative model, in spite of their differences (particularly as they sometimes are relatively small ....) and their possible doctrinal abstention.
► View Text
Without this becoming - in a great delirium of mimicry and for the greatest happiness of our Grand Archbishop Ahmed - the "
æconomisme"as a new religion [humor mode" OFF "] (
)
and even I go out, there -> []
Ahmed wrote:Ahmed wrote:On the other hand, I find that your formula: "The future of humanity will be baba-cool or it will not be!", Responds admirably to the question of
Christophe!
[.] Failing to achieve this, which seems indeed improbable in the current context, it remains important to understand the evolution of a historically unprecedented situation.
Sen-no-sen had indeed discussed the idea (subtle) that economism was only the discrete vector of techno-science, and a new technological era arise purely from the rubble of the economy, except this hypothetical developments which could functionally conceived, fishing by the possibility of the transition. Indeed, consubstantiation of these two entities is proven and it is unclear how could operate empowerment of the second, when the collapse of the first would tend to lead to a deep chaos (I speak here of a end of the economy suffered and not chosen ...). This chaos would result from a functional breakdown coexisting with a mind set on the old software *.
* If we are unable to calmly consider this break today, why would it be easier at a time of acute crisis, rained conducive to stunning or violence that analysis?
Even the wave of "minimalism" has been taken to great profit by the world of "economics-finance": it was a betrayal of virtue!
PS: actually Christophe is playful, he asks questions that he has the answer!